Skip to main content

Sound Advice: September 9, 2026

Fixed annuities are usually among the worst investments.

Fixed annuities are not inherently bad, but they are often poor investments when compared with low-cost alternatives, especially for someone who already has adequate retirement income and doesn't need an insurance guarantee.

Here are the main reasons:

1. Low expected returns

A fixed annuity typically provides a guaranteed interest rate, but that rate may be substantially below what you could reasonably expect from a diversified portfolio of stocks and bonds over a long retirement.

The trade-off is intentional: You surrender some upside in exchange for guarantees.

2. Inflation can quietly eat away at your money

Suppose an annuity earns 4% while inflation averages 3%. Your nominal balance is growing, but your purchasing power is increasing by only about 1% before taxes.

For a retirement that could last 25–30 years, inflation risk matters enormously.

3. Your money can be difficult to access

Fixed annuities commonly have surrender periods lasting three to 10 years, during which early withdrawals beyond a free allowance incur declining surrender charges.

What Is a Surrender Period? The surrender period is the timeframe after purchasing a fixed annuity during which withdrawing more than the allowed free amount triggers a surrender charge, a percentage-based fee deducted from your withdrawal. This period protects the insurer’s long-term investment strategy and allows them to offer higher guaranteed rates and benefits.

4. Tax deferral isn't as valuable as it sounds

Annuities are tax-deferred, which sounds attractive. But if you are investing through a taxable account, there are often more flexible ways to manage taxes.

And when you eventually withdraw earnings from a nonqualified annuity, they are generally taxed as ordinary income, rather than potentially receiving the lower long-term capital-gains rate available for many investments.

5. You can lose a valuable tax benefit at death

Nonqualified annuities generally don't receive the same step-up in cost basis that appreciated stocks and many other capital assets can receive at death.

That can make annuities particularly unattractive as a legacy asset.

6. Complexity can obscure the economics

Annuity contracts can contain provisions concerning:

  • surrender charges
  • renewal rates
  • minimum guarantees
  • withdrawal provisions
  • riders
  • mortality/expense charges
  • commissions
  • insurer crediting methods

The product can look simple—"guaranteed 5%"—while the actual economics are considerably more complicated.

7. The insurance company is the guarantor

The guarantee isn't the same thing as a government guarantee. Your payments ultimately depend on the financial strength of the issuing insurance company, subject to the applicable state guarantee association protections and limits.

8. The salesperson's incentive can be substantial

This is one of the biggest issues.

Fixed annuities are frequently sold through commissioned insurance agents. The commission is embedded in the economics of the product rather than appearing as an obvious annual investment management fee. That doesn't automatically make the recommendation inappropriate—but it creates a potential conflict of interest.

9. You're locking in today's rates

If you buy a multi-year fixed annuity and interest rates subsequently rise, you may be stuck earning the lower contractual rate unless you pay a surrender charge to get out.

Conversely, if rates fall, the guarantee becomes more valuable.

10. A bond/CD portfolio can provide more flexibility

For someone primarily seeking safety, it's worth comparing a fixed annuity with:

Treasuries + CDs + high-quality bonds

You can construct a ladder with different maturities, retain substantially more liquidity, and generally have much greater transparency about what you own.

But here's the important distinction

The argument against fixed annuities is not that guarantees have no value.

They can make sense for someone who says:

"I don't care about maximizing my expected return. I want a predictable amount of money and I am willing to sacrifice liquidity and some potential return to get it."

That's a legitimate objective.

The problem arises when someone is sold an annuity as an investment when what they really need is a simple, diversified portfolio.

Rule of thumb:

If the objective is long-term growth and retirement flexibility, favor a low-cost diversified portfolio.

If the objective is guaranteed income for life, an annuity deserves consideration—but compare the specific annuity against alternatives and look very carefully at the fees, guarantees, surrender provisions, inflation protection, insurer, and salesperson compensation.

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Sound Advice: July 16, 2025

Fixed annuities are poor investments Fixed annuities are often criticized as poor investments for several reasons, despite their reputation for providing stable, predictable income.  Here are the key drawbacks and concerns:   High Fees and Commissions Internal Fees:  Fixed annuities can carry a range of fees, including administrative charges, mortality expense risk fees, and rider fees. These can add up to 2%–4% per year, significantly eroding returns over time. Commissions:  Sales agents and financial advisors often receive high commissions for selling annuities—sometimes as much as 5%–8% of the invested amount. This creates a financial incentive for advisers to recommend them, even when they may not be the best fit for the client. Comparison to Other Investments:  Mutual funds and ETFs typically have much lower fees and commissions, making them more cost-effective for long-term growth. Limited Growth a...
Post a Comment
Read more

Sound Advice: October 8, 2025

How many investors have outperformed the stock market over the last 20 years? Very few investors have outperformed the stock market over the past 20 years.   Data shows that only about 6% to 8% of actively managed equity funds in the U.S. beat the market over this period, with the vast majority—over 90%—underperforming the S&P 500 or equivalent broad indexes. Percentage of Investors Beating the Market Only 8% of equity funds investing in large companies managed to outperform the market over a recent 20-year span. About 94% of all domestic funds underperformed the S&P 1500 Composite Index from 2005-2024. Over shorter timeframes (5-10 years), typically fewer than 15-20% of fund managers beat the S&P 500, and performance persistence is rare. Why It Is Rare The S&P 500’s high returns have proven immensely difficult to beat, especially as indexing has become popular and markets have ...
Post a Comment
Read more

Sound Advice: January 15, 2025

Why investors shouldn't pay attention to Wall Street forecasts   Investors shouldn't pay attention to Wall Street forecasts for several compelling reasons: Poor accuracy Wall Street forecasts have a terrible track record of accuracy. Studies show that their predictions are often no better than random chance, with accuracy rates as low as 47%   Some prominent analysts even perform worse, with accuracy ratings as low as 35% Consistent overestimation Analysts consistently overestimate earnings growth, predicting 10-12%                 annual growth when the reality is closer to 6%.   This overoptimism can                 lead investors to make overly aggressive bets in the market. Inability to predict unpredictable events The stock market is influenced by numerous unpredictable factors, including geopolitical events, technological changes, and company-specific news.   Anal...
Post a Comment
Read more