Am I better off with a local cost total market index fund or a costly wealth manager? For many investors, a low-cost total market index fund is the better choice . A costly wealth manager can be worthwhile, but only if they provide value beyond investment selection—things like tax planning, estate planning coordination, retirement-income strategy, behavioral coaching, and complex financial decision-making. The key question is not "Can a wealth manager pick better stocks?" Most cannot consistently beat a low-cost index approach after fees. The question is: "Will the advice and discipline they provide be worth the fee?" The cost difference is enormous Suppose you invest $1 million for 20 years and earn a hypothetical 7% annual return before fees: Approach Annual cost Approx. ending value Total market index fund 0.05% ~$3.84 million Wealth manager 1.00% ...
Make sure to read the small print in drug commercials The "small print" in prescription drug commercials isn't actually hidden—it's usually spoken quickly or displayed briefly during what's called the major statement of risks. The scariest parts are often rare, but they're included because the risks can be serious. Some of the most alarming warnings commonly heard include: Death: Some medications carry warnings about an increased risk of death in certain patients. For example, some antipsychotics have a boxed warning about increased mortality in elderly patients with dementia-related psychosis. Suicidal thoughts and behavior: Many antidepressants, seizure medications, and other drugs warn about an increased risk of suicidal thinking, especially in children, adolescents, and young adults. Life-threatening infections: Drugs that suppress the immune system (such as those for rheumatoid arthritis, psoria...