Skip to main content

Sound Advice: January 3, 2025

2025 Market Forecasts: Stupidity Taken To An Extreme 

If you know anything about stock market performance, you can only gag at the nonsense “esteemed forecasters” are now putting forth about the prospective path of stocks in the year ahead.  Our cousins in the UK would call this rubbish.  I would not be as kind.

Leading the Ship of Fools is the forecast from the Chief Investment Strategist at Oppenheimer who is looking for a year-end 2025 level for the Standard & Poor’s Index of 7,100, a whopping 21% increase from the most recent standing.  Indeed, most of these folks are looking for double-digit gains.  Only two expect stocks to weaken.

In the last 30 years, the market has risen by more than 20% only 15 times.  The exceptional span during that time was 1996-1999, which accounted for four of those jumps.  What followed in 2000 through 2002 was the polar opposite:

2000:     -9.1%

2001:    -11.9%

2002:    -22.1%

For 2023 and 2024, the annual S&P returns were 26.3% and 25.0%, respectively.  Were we to have similar numbers this year, my best advice would be to head to the life rafts.  Yet there are more than a few people who will blindly follow these silly people over the cliff.

Here’s the problem:

Stock market forecasts are notoriously inaccurate. Studies have shown that experts are often no better at predicting market movements than chance would dictate. Despite this poor track record, there's little accountability for wrong predictions. Forecasters rarely face consequences for inaccurate projections, allowing them to continue making predictions without repercussion.

These forecasts can lead investors to make ill-advised decisions based on fear or unfounded optimism. Rather than adhering to a sound, long-term investment strategy, investors might be tempted to react to market predictions, potentially harming their financial well-being.

Anyone can make stock market forecasts, regardless of their qualifications or expertise. This ease of production leads to a proliferation of predictions, many of which are baseless or poorly researched. 

Wall Street forecasts tend to exhibit a persistent optimistic bias. Analysis of past predictions shows that strategists consistently anticipate annual gains, even in years when the market experiences significant downturns.

Historical data reveals the futility of market predictions. One analysis found that Wall Street consensus forecasts had an average error of 14.2 percentage points when compared to actual market performance.  Such a large discrepancy makes these forecasts useless for making informed investment decisions.

Use a Ouija board if you must, but don’t say I didn’t tell you.


N. Russell Wayne

Weston, CT  06883

 

203-895-8877

www.soundasset.blogspot.com

 

 

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Sound Advice: September 19, 2026

Is AI good news or bad news for investments? AI is potentially very good news for investors—but not automatically good news for every investment . The key distinction is between AI as an economic technology and AI stocks at today's prices . As of September 2026, there are compelling reasons for both optimism and caution: The bullish case: AI spending remains enormous. Gartner estimates global AI spending at $2.7 trillion in 2026 , up 49.5% year over year. If AI produces sustained productivity gains, corporate profits could expand well beyond the companies currently selling AI hardware. The valuation case: Investors have already priced in a lot of success. Valuations of major AI companies are elevated and expected long-term earnings growth is well above historical norms. The spending-risk case: The five largest hyperscalers are expected to spend more than $1 trillion on AI-related capital expendit...
Post a Comment
Read more

Sound Advice: September 30, 2026

Now what? For many women, there comes a time when financial confusion reigns.   It may come after a spouse passes or a marriage goes off the rails.   It’s the same situation for women who never married. The questions are many.   The answers may be few.   Toward the top of the list of concerns is the issue of understanding.   Although there are always complex matters, it’s essential that all of the elements are clearly presented in a straightforward fashion.   There’s more.   Presentation is one thing, but comprehension is another. If there’s a question, it must be asked.   Clarity is the key.   Don’t just say I get it when you don’t.   And, it’s essential to grasp how each of the items fits in the overall situation. In the absence of understanding, no decisions will be made. Here are some of the most pressing questions? What’s the smart way to handle my investments? Where should I go for advice? A bank, stockbroker, attor...
Post a Comment
Read more

Sound Advice: October 14, 2026

Why your adviser must be a fiduciary   You should insist that your financial adviser be a fiduciary because a fiduciary is legally obligated, when acting in a fiduciary capacity, to put your interests ahead of their own and manage conflicts of interest appropriately. Key reasons: Your interests come first. A fiduciary duty requires the adviser to act in your best interest rather than simply recommending something that is suitable or profitable for them. Fewer conflicts of interest. Some advisers can receive commissions, bonuses, or other compensation for recommending particular investments or insurance products. A fiduciary must address material conflicts rather than allowing them to drive the recommendation. Greater transparency. Fiduciary advisers generally have obligations concerning disclosure, fees, conflicts, and how they are compensated. That makes it easier for you to understand what you're actually paying. Better alignment over the long term. A good adviser sh...
Post a Comment
Read more