Skip to main content

Sound Advice: July30, 2026

How is the stock market doing?

As of late July 2026, the answer depends on exactly how you measure it, but the numbers show a striking difference.

  • S&P 500 (cap-weighted): about +8.5% year to date.
  • S&P 500 Ex-Magnificent 7 Index: about +12.2% year to date (price return as of July 24, 2026).

That means the S&P 500 excluding the Magnificent Seven has actually outperformed the traditional S&P 500 by roughly 3.7 percentage points so far this year.

This is a notable reversal from 2023–2025, when the Magnificent Seven (Apple, Microsoft, Nvidia, Amazon, Alphabet, Meta, and Tesla) were responsible for a disproportionate share of the index's gains. In 2026:

  • Several Magnificent Seven stocks have stumbled or corrected.
  • Healthcare, financials, industrials, and many smaller technology and semiconductor companies have taken over market leadership.
  • The equal-weighted S&P 500 has also outperformed the traditional cap-weighted index, another sign that gains have become much broader across the market.

For investors, this is an important reminder that headlines about "the S&P 500" don't always tell the full story. A capitalization-weighted index can be heavily influenced by a handful of mega-cap stocks, while measures such as the equal-weighted S&P 500 or the S&P 500 Ex-Magnificent 7 Index can provide a better sense of how the average large U.S. company is performing.

What is the return of the equal-weighted S&P 500 Index excluding the Magnificent Seven stocks?

There is not a widely published index that is both:

  1. Equal-weighted, and
  2. Excludes the Magnificent Seven

So there isn't an official S&P Dow Jones benchmark that reports this combination the way it does for:

  • S&P 500 Equal Weight Index (YTD +11.44% as of July 24, 2026), and
  • S&P 500 Ex-Magnificent 7 Index (YTD +12.22% as of July 24, 2026).

Even so, because the Magnificent Seven each represent only about 0.2% of an equal-weight index (roughly 1.4% combined), removing them has only a modest impact on performance. Based on their collective performance this year, the equal-weight S&P 500 excluding the Magnificent Seven would likely be approximately +11.5% to +12.0% year to date—very close to the published equal-weight index.

This illustrates an important point:

Index

Approx. YTD Return

S&P 500 (cap-weighted)

~8.5%

S&P 500 Ex-Magnificent 7

12.2%

S&P 500 Equal Weight

11.4%

Equal Weight Ex-Magnificent 7

≈11.5–12.0% (estimated)

The takeaway is that 2026 has been a year of broad market participation. Once you either (1) remove the Magnificent Seven from a cap-weighted index or (2) greatly reduce their influence through equal weighting, the rest of the market has delivered returns in roughly the low-double-digit range.

And what is the likelihood of a major market pullback in the next 12 to 18 months?

No one can reliably assign a precise probability to a major market pullback over the next 12–18 months. If they could, they'd have an enormous investing edge. But we can look at history and today's conditions to frame the risk.

Historically:

  • A 10% correction occurs about once every 1–2 years.
  • A 20% or greater bear market has occurred about once every 5–7 years, though the timing is highly irregular.

Given today's backdrop, I would characterize the risk like this:

Pullback

My assessment

5–10%

Very likely

10–20%

More likely than not

More than 20%

Plausible, but not the base case

 Several factors argue for increased volatility:

  • Equity valuations remain elevated by historical standards.
  • Interest rates are still relatively high, and investors are uncertain about the Federal Reserve's next moves.
  • Geopolitical risks, including energy markets, remain elevated.
  • Corporate earnings expectations are high, leaving less room for disappointment.

On the other hand, there are also constructive factors:

  • Earnings growth has broadened beyond just the largest technology companies.
  • Market participation has improved this year, with more sectors contributing to gains.
  • Many institutional forecasts still expect positive equity returns over the next year rather than an imminent recession.

The statistic I find most useful isn't the probability of a correction—it's this:

If you're invested long enough, you should expect a 10–15% decline from time to time. It's normal, not exceptional.

The bigger question is whether a pullback would be driven by a weakening economy or simply by investors paying lower prices for the same earnings. Those are very different environments.

Based on the market breadth, one encouraging sign is that 2026's gains have been much broader than in prior years. Bull markets supported by a wide range of companies are generally viewed as healthier than those led by only a handful of mega-cap stocks. That doesn't eliminate correction risk, but it may reduce the market's dependence on a small group of companies.

So if I had to summarize the next 12–18 months in one sentence, it would be:

  • A normal correction (10–15%) would not surprise me at all.
  • A deep bear market (30%+) is possible but does not appear to be the most likely outcome based on the information currently available.

 

 

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Sound Advice: January 3, 2025

2025 Market Forecasts: Stupidity Taken To An Extreme   If you know anything about stock market performance, you can only gag at the nonsense “esteemed forecasters” are now putting forth about the prospective path of stocks in the year ahead.   Our cousins in the UK would call this rubbish.   I would not be as kind. Leading the Ship of Fools is the forecast from the Chief Investment Strategist at Oppenheimer who is looking for a year-end 2025 level for the Standard & Poor’s Index of 7,100, a whopping 21% increase from the most recent standing.   Indeed, most of these folks are looking for double-digit gains.   Only two expect stocks to weaken. In the last 30 years, the market has risen by more than 20% only 15 times.   The exceptional span during that time was 1996-1999, which accounted for four of those jumps.   What followed in 2000 through 2002 was the polar opposite: 2000:      -9.1% 2001:     -11.9% ...

Sound Advice: January 15, 2025

Why investors shouldn't pay attention to Wall Street forecasts   Investors shouldn't pay attention to Wall Street forecasts for several compelling reasons: Poor accuracy Wall Street forecasts have a terrible track record of accuracy. Studies show that their predictions are often no better than random chance, with accuracy rates as low as 47%   Some prominent analysts even perform worse, with accuracy ratings as low as 35% Consistent overestimation Analysts consistently overestimate earnings growth, predicting 10-12%                 annual growth when the reality is closer to 6%.   This overoptimism can                 lead investors to make overly aggressive bets in the market. Inability to predict unpredictable events The stock market is influenced by numerous unpredictable factors, including geopolitical events, technological changes, and company-specific news.   Anal...

Sound Advice: July 16, 2025

Fixed annuities are poor investments Fixed annuities are often criticized as poor investments for several reasons, despite their reputation for providing stable, predictable income.  Here are the key drawbacks and concerns:   High Fees and Commissions Internal Fees:  Fixed annuities can carry a range of fees, including administrative charges, mortality expense risk fees, and rider fees. These can add up to 2%–4% per year, significantly eroding returns over time. Commissions:  Sales agents and financial advisors often receive high commissions for selling annuities—sometimes as much as 5%–8% of the invested amount. This creates a financial incentive for advisers to recommend them, even when they may not be the best fit for the client. Comparison to Other Investments:  Mutual funds and ETFs typically have much lower fees and commissions, making them more cost-effective for long-term growth. Limited Growth a...