Skip to main content

Sound Advice: April 29, 2026

Why You Should Avoid Carnivore Style “Investing”

You should avoid “carnivore”‑style stock investing because it’s essentially high‑turnover, short‑term stock picking with marketing‑driven promises, which conflicts with evidence‑based, long‑term investing.

What “carnivore” investing is

  • It’s usually a subscription alert service that tells you what to buy and sell, often multiple times per day.
  • The focus is short‑term momentum trades, including concentrated positions and sometimes margin/shorting, not broad long‑term ownership of businesses.
  • Marketing often highlights huge historical outperformance and “veteran Wall Street traders” using proprietary methods, with limited transparent, verifiable track records.​

Key reasons to avoid it

  • High turnover and costs: Frequent trading means spreads, commissions (where applicable), and tax drag in taxable accounts, all of which compound against you over time.
  • Concentration risk: Alerts often cluster in a small set of high‑beta names; a few bad trades can damage capital much more than in a diversified index fund.
  • Strategy opacity: Methodology is proprietary and only loosely described, so you can’t rigorously evaluate edge, risk or whether results are cherry‑picked.
  • Behavior risk: Rapid alerts encourage reactive trading; users on forums report whipsawing in and out of positions with quick 5–6% losses, which is the opposite of a disciplined IPS‑driven process.
  • Misaligned with your likely goals: Most long‑term investors are better served by diversified, low‑cost total‑market exposure rather than trying to front‑run short‑term moves.

Red flags in the marketing

  • Implied or explicit “100% per year” type return targets and big “we crush the S&P 500” claims without institution‑grade, audited performance reporting.
  • Reliance on personality and mystique (anonymous or semi‑anonymous traders, “Lions of Wall Street” branding) instead of robust, testable process and risk disclosures.​
  • Targeting beginners by saying “we tell you exactly what to trade,” which encourages outsourcing judgment without teaching proper risk management.

Better way to think about it

  • Use broad, low‑cost index funds or systematic strategies as your core; they give diversified exposure, low fees, and strong odds of beating most active traders over time.
  • If you’re curious, limit any “carnivore”‑style experiments to a small, explicitly capped “fun money” sleeve that you can lose without affecting retirement or core goals.

  

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Sound Advice: January 3, 2025

2025 Market Forecasts: Stupidity Taken To An Extreme   If you know anything about stock market performance, you can only gag at the nonsense “esteemed forecasters” are now putting forth about the prospective path of stocks in the year ahead.   Our cousins in the UK would call this rubbish.   I would not be as kind. Leading the Ship of Fools is the forecast from the Chief Investment Strategist at Oppenheimer who is looking for a year-end 2025 level for the Standard & Poor’s Index of 7,100, a whopping 21% increase from the most recent standing.   Indeed, most of these folks are looking for double-digit gains.   Only two expect stocks to weaken. In the last 30 years, the market has risen by more than 20% only 15 times.   The exceptional span during that time was 1996-1999, which accounted for four of those jumps.   What followed in 2000 through 2002 was the polar opposite: 2000:      -9.1% 2001:     -11.9% ...
Post a Comment
Read more

Sound Advice: January 15, 2025

Why investors shouldn't pay attention to Wall Street forecasts   Investors shouldn't pay attention to Wall Street forecasts for several compelling reasons: Poor accuracy Wall Street forecasts have a terrible track record of accuracy. Studies show that their predictions are often no better than random chance, with accuracy rates as low as 47%   Some prominent analysts even perform worse, with accuracy ratings as low as 35% Consistent overestimation Analysts consistently overestimate earnings growth, predicting 10-12%                 annual growth when the reality is closer to 6%.   This overoptimism can                 lead investors to make overly aggressive bets in the market. Inability to predict unpredictable events The stock market is influenced by numerous unpredictable factors, including geopolitical events, technological changes, and company-specific news.   Anal...
Post a Comment
Read more

Sound Advice: July 16, 2025

Fixed annuities are poor investments Fixed annuities are often criticized as poor investments for several reasons, despite their reputation for providing stable, predictable income.  Here are the key drawbacks and concerns:   High Fees and Commissions Internal Fees:  Fixed annuities can carry a range of fees, including administrative charges, mortality expense risk fees, and rider fees. These can add up to 2%–4% per year, significantly eroding returns over time. Commissions:  Sales agents and financial advisors often receive high commissions for selling annuities—sometimes as much as 5%–8% of the invested amount. This creates a financial incentive for advisers to recommend them, even when they may not be the best fit for the client. Comparison to Other Investments:  Mutual funds and ETFs typically have much lower fees and commissions, making them more cost-effective for long-term growth. Limited Growth a...
Post a Comment
Read more