Skip to main content

Sound Advice: April 22, 2026

Do the recent five-year returns from market index funds vary widely?

They can vary, but not as wildly as it might seem from headlines—most broad, low‑cost market index funds with similar mandates cluster fairly tightly over five‑year periods, with bigger gaps only when the underlying exposures differ meaningfully.​

When returns are similar

Among funds that track the same index (e.g., multiple S&P 500 index funds), five‑year differences are usually small, often within roughly 0.2–1% per year, driven mainly by expense ratios, tracking error, and tiny implementation differences. Over a full five‑year span that might add up to a couple of percentage points in cumulative performance, but not tens of percentage points.​

When returns diverge more

Five‑year returns do spread out once you compare funds tracking different parts of the market:

  • U.S. large‑cap vs U.S. small‑cap.
  • U.S. vs developed ex‑U.S. vs emerging markets.
  • Equity vs bond index funds.

Because those segments have had very different annual results (e.g., big swings in equities vs more muted bond returns in the same years), the compounded five‑year numbers can diverge quite a bit, sometimes by double‑digit percentage points cumulatively.​

How to think about it as an investor

  • Within a given asset class and index, focus on costs and tracking quality, not performance differences, because the underlying index drives almost all of the return.
  • Across different index types, expect five‑year returns to be meaningfully different and make sure the mix you look at matches your actual allocation, not just one headline index.

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Sound Advice: January 3, 2025

2025 Market Forecasts: Stupidity Taken To An Extreme   If you know anything about stock market performance, you can only gag at the nonsense “esteemed forecasters” are now putting forth about the prospective path of stocks in the year ahead.   Our cousins in the UK would call this rubbish.   I would not be as kind. Leading the Ship of Fools is the forecast from the Chief Investment Strategist at Oppenheimer who is looking for a year-end 2025 level for the Standard & Poor’s Index of 7,100, a whopping 21% increase from the most recent standing.   Indeed, most of these folks are looking for double-digit gains.   Only two expect stocks to weaken. In the last 30 years, the market has risen by more than 20% only 15 times.   The exceptional span during that time was 1996-1999, which accounted for four of those jumps.   What followed in 2000 through 2002 was the polar opposite: 2000:      -9.1% 2001:     -11.9% ...
Post a Comment
Read more

Sound Advice: January 15, 2025

Why investors shouldn't pay attention to Wall Street forecasts   Investors shouldn't pay attention to Wall Street forecasts for several compelling reasons: Poor accuracy Wall Street forecasts have a terrible track record of accuracy. Studies show that their predictions are often no better than random chance, with accuracy rates as low as 47%   Some prominent analysts even perform worse, with accuracy ratings as low as 35% Consistent overestimation Analysts consistently overestimate earnings growth, predicting 10-12%                 annual growth when the reality is closer to 6%.   This overoptimism can                 lead investors to make overly aggressive bets in the market. Inability to predict unpredictable events The stock market is influenced by numerous unpredictable factors, including geopolitical events, technological changes, and company-specific news.   Anal...
Post a Comment
Read more

Sound Advice: July 16, 2025

Fixed annuities are poor investments Fixed annuities are often criticized as poor investments for several reasons, despite their reputation for providing stable, predictable income.  Here are the key drawbacks and concerns:   High Fees and Commissions Internal Fees:  Fixed annuities can carry a range of fees, including administrative charges, mortality expense risk fees, and rider fees. These can add up to 2%–4% per year, significantly eroding returns over time. Commissions:  Sales agents and financial advisors often receive high commissions for selling annuities—sometimes as much as 5%–8% of the invested amount. This creates a financial incentive for advisers to recommend them, even when they may not be the best fit for the client. Comparison to Other Investments:  Mutual funds and ETFs typically have much lower fees and commissions, making them more cost-effective for long-term growth. Limited Growth a...
Post a Comment
Read more