Skip to main content

Sound Advice: March 12, 2026

Why You Should Watch the Shiller CAPE Index 

The Shiller CAPE Index is a long‑term valuation metric for stocks that compares today’s prices to 10 years of inflation‑adjusted earnings, and you should care because extreme readings have historically lined up with meaningfully different long‑run returns.

What the Shiller CAPE Index is

  • CAPE stands for Cyclically Adjusted Price‑to‑Earnings ratio, also called the Shiller P/E or P/E 10.
  • It is calculated as: current index level divided by the average of the last 10 years of earnings per share, with those earnings adjusted for inflation.
  • Robert Shiller popularized it to smooth out the business cycle noise that distorts the usual one‑year P/E.

What it is trying to tell you

  • By averaging a decade of real earnings, CAPE aims to say, “How expensive is this market relative to a normal level of earnings through a full cycle?”
  • Higher‑than‑average CAPE has historically been associated with lower‑than‑average real equity returns over the next 10–20 years, and vice versa.
  • Many practitioners invert it into a “CAPE yield” (1 ÷ CAPE) as a rough estimate of long‑run real return for planning purposes.

Why you should be concerned (but not panicked)

  • When CAPE is far above its long‑term average, it suggests the market is richly valued and forward 10‑year real returns are likely to be subdued compared with history.
  • That matters for retirement planning, withdrawal rates, liability matching, and for how much risk premium you can reasonably assume from equities going forward.
  • Very high CAPE readings have often preceded extended periods of disappointing returns, even if they did not immediately precede a crash.

What it does not do well

  • CAPE is not a timing tool; it cannot tell you when a bull market will end or when to go to cash. High CAPE levels can persist for many years.
  • Structural shifts (sector mix, margins, accounting, interest‑rate regimes) can make “fair value” drift over time, so you should treat CAPE as a blunt, regime‑level indicator, not a precise trigger.

How to use it in practice

  • Use CAPE to set expectations: lower return assumptions, more conservative withdrawal rates, and more robust stress tests when it is very high.
  • Consider diversification (non‑US equities, other asset classes) and factor in that U.S. large‑cap valuations may embed optimistic assumptions.
  • Avoid all‑in/all‑out decisions; instead, adjust around the edges—savings rate, tilt size, bond duration or rebalancing bands—based on what CAPE is implying about long‑term reward for risk.

The Shiller CAPE is flashing “expensive,” which implies lower long‑term expected returns from U.S. equities but not a precise crash call or timing signal.

What the CAPE is saying now

  • Recent readings for the S&P 500 Shiller CAPE are around the high‑30s to about 39, near levels last seen around the dot‑com bubble.
  • That’s more than double its long‑run historical median (roughly mid‑teens), meaning U.S. large‑caps are richly valued versus their own history.

What that actually warns

  • Historically, very high CAPE levels have been followed by below‑average real returns over subsequent 10–20 years, not necessarily immediate crashes.
  • A CAPE near 40 essentially says: “Don’t expect the next couple of decades to look like the last one from this starting valuation.”

What it does not tell you

  • It does not pinpoint tops, corrections or recessions; CAPE was elevated for years in the 1990s before the market finally broke.
  • It is also a blunt tool: accounting changes, sector mix (more tech, fewer old‑economy stocks), and low interest rates can keep it structurally higher than in earlier eras.

Practical implications for you

  • Use it as a risk‑management and planning input, not a trading trigger: Assume lower forward real returns in financial plans and stress tests.
  • Consider: modestly higher savings rates, more conservative withdrawal rates, and being careful about concentration in U.S. mega‑caps, rather than wholesale market timing.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Sound Advice: July 16, 2025

Fixed annuities are poor investments Fixed annuities are often criticized as poor investments for several reasons, despite their reputation for providing stable, predictable income.  Here are the key drawbacks and concerns:   High Fees and Commissions Internal Fees:  Fixed annuities can carry a range of fees, including administrative charges, mortality expense risk fees, and rider fees. These can add up to 2%–4% per year, significantly eroding returns over time. Commissions:  Sales agents and financial advisors often receive high commissions for selling annuities—sometimes as much as 5%–8% of the invested amount. This creates a financial incentive for advisers to recommend them, even when they may not be the best fit for the client. Comparison to Other Investments:  Mutual funds and ETFs typically have much lower fees and commissions, making them more cost-effective for long-term growth. Limited Growth a...

Sound Advice: October 8, 2025

How many investors have outperformed the stock market over the last 20 years? Very few investors have outperformed the stock market over the past 20 years.   Data shows that only about 6% to 8% of actively managed equity funds in the U.S. beat the market over this period, with the vast majority—over 90%—underperforming the S&P 500 or equivalent broad indexes. Percentage of Investors Beating the Market Only 8% of equity funds investing in large companies managed to outperform the market over a recent 20-year span. About 94% of all domestic funds underperformed the S&P 1500 Composite Index from 2005-2024. Over shorter timeframes (5-10 years), typically fewer than 15-20% of fund managers beat the S&P 500, and performance persistence is rare. Why It Is Rare The S&P 500’s high returns have proven immensely difficult to beat, especially as indexing has become popular and markets have ...

Sound Advice: January 15, 2025

Why investors shouldn't pay attention to Wall Street forecasts   Investors shouldn't pay attention to Wall Street forecasts for several compelling reasons: Poor accuracy Wall Street forecasts have a terrible track record of accuracy. Studies show that their predictions are often no better than random chance, with accuracy rates as low as 47%   Some prominent analysts even perform worse, with accuracy ratings as low as 35% Consistent overestimation Analysts consistently overestimate earnings growth, predicting 10-12%                 annual growth when the reality is closer to 6%.   This overoptimism can                 lead investors to make overly aggressive bets in the market. Inability to predict unpredictable events The stock market is influenced by numerous unpredictable factors, including geopolitical events, technological changes, and company-specific news.   Anal...