Skip to main content

Sound Advice: March 12, 2026

Why You Should Watch the Shiller CAPE Index 

The Shiller CAPE Index is a long‑term valuation metric for stocks that compares today’s prices to 10 years of inflation‑adjusted earnings, and you should care because extreme readings have historically lined up with meaningfully different long‑run returns.

What the Shiller CAPE Index is

  • CAPE stands for Cyclically Adjusted Price‑to‑Earnings ratio, also called the Shiller P/E or P/E 10.
  • It is calculated as: current index level divided by the average of the last 10 years of earnings per share, with those earnings adjusted for inflation.
  • Robert Shiller popularized it to smooth out the business cycle noise that distorts the usual one‑year P/E.

What it is trying to tell you

  • By averaging a decade of real earnings, CAPE aims to say, “How expensive is this market relative to a normal level of earnings through a full cycle?”
  • Higher‑than‑average CAPE has historically been associated with lower‑than‑average real equity returns over the next 10–20 years, and vice versa.
  • Many practitioners invert it into a “CAPE yield” (1 ÷ CAPE) as a rough estimate of long‑run real return for planning purposes.

Why you should be concerned (but not panicked)

  • When CAPE is far above its long‑term average, it suggests the market is richly valued and forward 10‑year real returns are likely to be subdued compared with history.
  • That matters for retirement planning, withdrawal rates, liability matching, and for how much risk premium you can reasonably assume from equities going forward.
  • Very high CAPE readings have often preceded extended periods of disappointing returns, even if they did not immediately precede a crash.

What it does not do well

  • CAPE is not a timing tool; it cannot tell you when a bull market will end or when to go to cash. High CAPE levels can persist for many years.
  • Structural shifts (sector mix, margins, accounting, interest‑rate regimes) can make “fair value” drift over time, so you should treat CAPE as a blunt, regime‑level indicator, not a precise trigger.

How to use it in practice

  • Use CAPE to set expectations: lower return assumptions, more conservative withdrawal rates, and more robust stress tests when it is very high.
  • Consider diversification (non‑US equities, other asset classes) and factor in that U.S. large‑cap valuations may embed optimistic assumptions.
  • Avoid all‑in/all‑out decisions; instead, adjust around the edges—savings rate, tilt size, bond duration or rebalancing bands—based on what CAPE is implying about long‑term reward for risk.

The Shiller CAPE is flashing “expensive,” which implies lower long‑term expected returns from U.S. equities but not a precise crash call or timing signal.

What the CAPE is saying now

  • Recent readings for the S&P 500 Shiller CAPE are around the high‑30s to about 39, near levels last seen around the dot‑com bubble.
  • That’s more than double its long‑run historical median (roughly mid‑teens), meaning U.S. large‑caps are richly valued versus their own history.

What that actually warns

  • Historically, very high CAPE levels have been followed by below‑average real returns over subsequent 10–20 years, not necessarily immediate crashes.
  • A CAPE near 40 essentially says: “Don’t expect the next couple of decades to look like the last one from this starting valuation.”

What it does not tell you

  • It does not pinpoint tops, corrections or recessions; CAPE was elevated for years in the 1990s before the market finally broke.
  • It is also a blunt tool: accounting changes, sector mix (more tech, fewer old‑economy stocks), and low interest rates can keep it structurally higher than in earlier eras.

Practical implications for you

  • Use it as a risk‑management and planning input, not a trading trigger: Assume lower forward real returns in financial plans and stress tests.
  • Consider: modestly higher savings rates, more conservative withdrawal rates, and being careful about concentration in U.S. mega‑caps, rather than wholesale market timing.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Sound Advice: January 3, 2025

2025 Market Forecasts: Stupidity Taken To An Extreme   If you know anything about stock market performance, you can only gag at the nonsense “esteemed forecasters” are now putting forth about the prospective path of stocks in the year ahead.   Our cousins in the UK would call this rubbish.   I would not be as kind. Leading the Ship of Fools is the forecast from the Chief Investment Strategist at Oppenheimer who is looking for a year-end 2025 level for the Standard & Poor’s Index of 7,100, a whopping 21% increase from the most recent standing.   Indeed, most of these folks are looking for double-digit gains.   Only two expect stocks to weaken. In the last 30 years, the market has risen by more than 20% only 15 times.   The exceptional span during that time was 1996-1999, which accounted for four of those jumps.   What followed in 2000 through 2002 was the polar opposite: 2000:      -9.1% 2001:     -11.9% ...

Sound Advice: January 15, 2025

Why investors shouldn't pay attention to Wall Street forecasts   Investors shouldn't pay attention to Wall Street forecasts for several compelling reasons: Poor accuracy Wall Street forecasts have a terrible track record of accuracy. Studies show that their predictions are often no better than random chance, with accuracy rates as low as 47%   Some prominent analysts even perform worse, with accuracy ratings as low as 35% Consistent overestimation Analysts consistently overestimate earnings growth, predicting 10-12%                 annual growth when the reality is closer to 6%.   This overoptimism can                 lead investors to make overly aggressive bets in the market. Inability to predict unpredictable events The stock market is influenced by numerous unpredictable factors, including geopolitical events, technological changes, and company-specific news.   Anal...

Sound Advice: July 16, 2025

Fixed annuities are poor investments Fixed annuities are often criticized as poor investments for several reasons, despite their reputation for providing stable, predictable income.  Here are the key drawbacks and concerns:   High Fees and Commissions Internal Fees:  Fixed annuities can carry a range of fees, including administrative charges, mortality expense risk fees, and rider fees. These can add up to 2%–4% per year, significantly eroding returns over time. Commissions:  Sales agents and financial advisors often receive high commissions for selling annuities—sometimes as much as 5%–8% of the invested amount. This creates a financial incentive for advisers to recommend them, even when they may not be the best fit for the client. Comparison to Other Investments:  Mutual funds and ETFs typically have much lower fees and commissions, making them more cost-effective for long-term growth. Limited Growth a...