Skip to main content

Sound Advice: February 11, 2026

Are there financial advisors who are really different?

There are advisors who operate very differently from the stereotypical product-pusher, but you have to know what to look for and how to verify it.​

What “different” really means

For an advisor who is genuinely different, look for:

  • Acts as a fiduciary all the time, not just “when providing advice”.​
  • Is paid only by you (fee-only: flat, hourly, or % of assets) with no commissions or kickbacks from products.​
  • Provides comprehensive planning (tax, retirement, estate, risk, cash flow), not just portfolio sales.​

Key structural signs

  • Fee-only vs. commission/fee-based
    • Fee-only: compensated solely by client fees; no product commissions or revenue sharing.​
    • Fee-based/commission: may earn both fees and product commissions, creating conflicts of interest.​
  • Fiduciary commitment
    • Registered investment advisors and many CFP professionals must put client interests first and disclose conflicts.​
    • Ask for a written affirmation that they are fiduciaries at all times for your relationship.​

Behavior and mindset differences

Research on top advisors points to traits that truly set them apart:

  • Purposeful mission to serve clients and help them reach goals, not just gather assets.​
  • Empathy, authenticity, and strong listening skills so the plan is built around your real life and behavior.​
  • Discipline and coaching to keep you from performance-chasing or panic-selling during market swings.​
  • Lifelong learning and continuous improvement so their advice stays current and evidence-based.​

How to test if someone is “that” advisor

When you interview advisors, you can quickly separate the marketing from the reality by asking:

  • “Exactly how are you compensated? Any commissions, referral fees, or revenue sharing?”​
  • “Will you sign in writing that you act as a fiduciary at all times?”​
  • “What services are included beyond investment management?” (tax planning, retirement income, estate, insurance review, behavior coaching).​
  • “How do you measure whether our relationship is successful?” (look for goals-based, planning-based answers over pure performance).​
  • Then cross-check them on FINRA BrokerCheck and the SEC site for disclosures or disciplinary history.​

 At-a-glance: typical vs. truly client-centric

Dimension

Typical advisor

Truly client-centric advisor

Compensation

Commissions or fee-based with conflicts.​

Fee-only, paid only by client.​

Duty

Suitability standard in many interactions.​

Fiduciary duty at all times.​

Primary focus

Products and assets gathered.​

Goals-based, comprehensive planning.​

Relationship style

Sales-oriented, limited listening.​

Empathetic, high-touch, strong listening.​

Market behavior

May react to headlines and performance.​

Emphasizes discipline and long-term process.​

 So yes—there really are advisors who operate in a structurally and behaviorally different way; the key is looking for fee-only, always-fiduciary, planning-centric professionals and verifying that their incentives and track record actually line up with the story.

 

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Sound Advice: January 3, 2025

2025 Market Forecasts: Stupidity Taken To An Extreme   If you know anything about stock market performance, you can only gag at the nonsense “esteemed forecasters” are now putting forth about the prospective path of stocks in the year ahead.   Our cousins in the UK would call this rubbish.   I would not be as kind. Leading the Ship of Fools is the forecast from the Chief Investment Strategist at Oppenheimer who is looking for a year-end 2025 level for the Standard & Poor’s Index of 7,100, a whopping 21% increase from the most recent standing.   Indeed, most of these folks are looking for double-digit gains.   Only two expect stocks to weaken. In the last 30 years, the market has risen by more than 20% only 15 times.   The exceptional span during that time was 1996-1999, which accounted for four of those jumps.   What followed in 2000 through 2002 was the polar opposite: 2000:      -9.1% 2001:     -11.9% ...
Post a Comment
Read more

Sound Advice: January 15, 2025

Why investors shouldn't pay attention to Wall Street forecasts   Investors shouldn't pay attention to Wall Street forecasts for several compelling reasons: Poor accuracy Wall Street forecasts have a terrible track record of accuracy. Studies show that their predictions are often no better than random chance, with accuracy rates as low as 47%   Some prominent analysts even perform worse, with accuracy ratings as low as 35% Consistent overestimation Analysts consistently overestimate earnings growth, predicting 10-12%                 annual growth when the reality is closer to 6%.   This overoptimism can                 lead investors to make overly aggressive bets in the market. Inability to predict unpredictable events The stock market is influenced by numerous unpredictable factors, including geopolitical events, technological changes, and company-specific news.   Anal...
Post a Comment
Read more

Sound Advice: March 10, 2021

The ABCs of Stock Picking After decades of analyzing stocks (and funds) and investing for clients, I'm happy to share in plain English what's involved, what works, and what doesn't.  Keep in mind the reality that successful stock picking is an effort to maintain a good batting average. In baseball, a batting average of .300 or better is considered quite good.  With stock picking, you need to do better than .600, which means you have many more winners than losers. No one gets it right all of the time.  It's not even close.  Wall Street shops all have their recommended lists and the financial media regularly hawk 10 stocks to buy now. Following that road usually is a direct route to disaster.  Don't be tempted. Let's begin with the big picture: The stock market goes up and down over time, but the long-term trend is up.  When there's a rally under way, everyone feels like a genius.  When the market hits an air pocket, though, with few exception...
Post a Comment
Read more