Skip to main content

Sound Advice: September 19, 2025

How does the resemblance of the current situation in the U.S. to the events of 1933 in Germany affect the financial markets?

The resemblance of the current situation in the U.S. the events of 1933 in Germany raises significant concerns for financial markets, primarily through heightened uncertainty, increased polarization, and risk of institutional instability -- factors that historically have led to market volatility and reduced investor confidence.

Historical Market Reactions

  • In 1933 Germany, the collapse of confidence in government and institutions led to drastic declines in stock prices, widespread business failures, and soaring unemployment.

  • Political outsiders exploiting institutional weakness intensified market disruption; major corporations suffered, but some firms closely connected to the new regime profited temporarily as their share prices rose.

Contemporary Parallels

  • Today’s U.S. situation features similar political polarization and a loss of public trust in leadership, which can mirror the sort of instability witnessed in Weimar Germany's final years.

  • Calls for stronger executive power and ongoing institutional challenges echo concerns that, if left unchecked, may result in market distress, default fears, and economic strain much like Germany’s sovereign default in 1933.

Financial Market Impact Today

  • Investors typically respond to such uncertainty by selling off risk assets, leading to stock market declines, higher volatility, and increased premiums on government debt as default or institutional crisis fears grow.

  • The rise of corporatism and erosion of democratic norms may disrupt established market rules and investor protections, further fueling uncertainty and the likelihood of severe market corrections.

  • There is cautious optimism among some observers due to differences in institutional resilience and economic structure, but the risk of economic polarization and dislocation remains significant for markets.

Key Differences and Risks

  • Unlike Germany in 1933, the U.S. has stronger, more diversified institutions, but increasing political division and the potential for executive overreach have led some analysts to warn of a “neo-feudal” or “warlord capitalist” environment, which could destabilize financial markets over time.

Overall, the financial markets tend to react very negatively to apparent resemblance between the U.S. political situation today and the events of 1933 in Germany, both due to historical precedent for economic collapse and investor anxieties about institutional breakdown and radical political change.

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Sound Advice: January 3, 2025

2025 Market Forecasts: Stupidity Taken To An Extreme   If you know anything about stock market performance, you can only gag at the nonsense “esteemed forecasters” are now putting forth about the prospective path of stocks in the year ahead.   Our cousins in the UK would call this rubbish.   I would not be as kind. Leading the Ship of Fools is the forecast from the Chief Investment Strategist at Oppenheimer who is looking for a year-end 2025 level for the Standard & Poor’s Index of 7,100, a whopping 21% increase from the most recent standing.   Indeed, most of these folks are looking for double-digit gains.   Only two expect stocks to weaken. In the last 30 years, the market has risen by more than 20% only 15 times.   The exceptional span during that time was 1996-1999, which accounted for four of those jumps.   What followed in 2000 through 2002 was the polar opposite: 2000:      -9.1% 2001:     -11.9% ...
Post a Comment
Read more

Sound Advice: March 10, 2021

The ABCs of Stock Picking After decades of analyzing stocks (and funds) and investing for clients, I'm happy to share in plain English what's involved, what works, and what doesn't.  Keep in mind the reality that successful stock picking is an effort to maintain a good batting average. In baseball, a batting average of .300 or better is considered quite good.  With stock picking, you need to do better than .600, which means you have many more winners than losers. No one gets it right all of the time.  It's not even close.  Wall Street shops all have their recommended lists and the financial media regularly hawk 10 stocks to buy now. Following that road usually is a direct route to disaster.  Don't be tempted. Let's begin with the big picture: The stock market goes up and down over time, but the long-term trend is up.  When there's a rally under way, everyone feels like a genius.  When the market hits an air pocket, though, with few exception...
Post a Comment
Read more

Sound Advice: January 15, 2025

Why investors shouldn't pay attention to Wall Street forecasts   Investors shouldn't pay attention to Wall Street forecasts for several compelling reasons: Poor accuracy Wall Street forecasts have a terrible track record of accuracy. Studies show that their predictions are often no better than random chance, with accuracy rates as low as 47%   Some prominent analysts even perform worse, with accuracy ratings as low as 35% Consistent overestimation Analysts consistently overestimate earnings growth, predicting 10-12%                 annual growth when the reality is closer to 6%.   This overoptimism can                 lead investors to make overly aggressive bets in the market. Inability to predict unpredictable events The stock market is influenced by numerous unpredictable factors, including geopolitical events, technological changes, and company-specific news.   Anal...
Post a Comment
Read more