Skip to main content

Sound Advice: September 19, 2025

How does the resemblance of the current situation in the U.S. to the events of 1933 in Germany affect the financial markets?

The resemblance of the current situation in the U.S. the events of 1933 in Germany raises significant concerns for financial markets, primarily through heightened uncertainty, increased polarization, and risk of institutional instability -- factors that historically have led to market volatility and reduced investor confidence.

Historical Market Reactions

  • In 1933 Germany, the collapse of confidence in government and institutions led to drastic declines in stock prices, widespread business failures, and soaring unemployment.

  • Political outsiders exploiting institutional weakness intensified market disruption; major corporations suffered, but some firms closely connected to the new regime profited temporarily as their share prices rose.

Contemporary Parallels

  • Today’s U.S. situation features similar political polarization and a loss of public trust in leadership, which can mirror the sort of instability witnessed in Weimar Germany's final years.

  • Calls for stronger executive power and ongoing institutional challenges echo concerns that, if left unchecked, may result in market distress, default fears, and economic strain much like Germany’s sovereign default in 1933.

Financial Market Impact Today

  • Investors typically respond to such uncertainty by selling off risk assets, leading to stock market declines, higher volatility, and increased premiums on government debt as default or institutional crisis fears grow.

  • The rise of corporatism and erosion of democratic norms may disrupt established market rules and investor protections, further fueling uncertainty and the likelihood of severe market corrections.

  • There is cautious optimism among some observers due to differences in institutional resilience and economic structure, but the risk of economic polarization and dislocation remains significant for markets.

Key Differences and Risks

  • Unlike Germany in 1933, the U.S. has stronger, more diversified institutions, but increasing political division and the potential for executive overreach have led some analysts to warn of a “neo-feudal” or “warlord capitalist” environment, which could destabilize financial markets over time.

Overall, the financial markets tend to react very negatively to apparent resemblance between the U.S. political situation today and the events of 1933 in Germany, both due to historical precedent for economic collapse and investor anxieties about institutional breakdown and radical political change.

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Sound Advice: January 3, 2025

2025 Market Forecasts: Stupidity Taken To An Extreme   If you know anything about stock market performance, you can only gag at the nonsense “esteemed forecasters” are now putting forth about the prospective path of stocks in the year ahead.   Our cousins in the UK would call this rubbish.   I would not be as kind. Leading the Ship of Fools is the forecast from the Chief Investment Strategist at Oppenheimer who is looking for a year-end 2025 level for the Standard & Poor’s Index of 7,100, a whopping 21% increase from the most recent standing.   Indeed, most of these folks are looking for double-digit gains.   Only two expect stocks to weaken. In the last 30 years, the market has risen by more than 20% only 15 times.   The exceptional span during that time was 1996-1999, which accounted for four of those jumps.   What followed in 2000 through 2002 was the polar opposite: 2000:      -9.1% 2001:     -11.9% ...
Post a Comment
Read more

Sound Advice: January 15, 2025

Why investors shouldn't pay attention to Wall Street forecasts   Investors shouldn't pay attention to Wall Street forecasts for several compelling reasons: Poor accuracy Wall Street forecasts have a terrible track record of accuracy. Studies show that their predictions are often no better than random chance, with accuracy rates as low as 47%   Some prominent analysts even perform worse, with accuracy ratings as low as 35% Consistent overestimation Analysts consistently overestimate earnings growth, predicting 10-12%                 annual growth when the reality is closer to 6%.   This overoptimism can                 lead investors to make overly aggressive bets in the market. Inability to predict unpredictable events The stock market is influenced by numerous unpredictable factors, including geopolitical events, technological changes, and company-specific news.   Anal...
Post a Comment
Read more

Sound Advice: October 12, 2022

More Pain Ahead? It’s been a difficult year for the investment markets, but tough times have happened before and they will certainly happen again.   Sometimes recoveries are relatively quick and sometimes a hefty dose of patience is required.   No two downdrafts are alike, but the net result is always a rebound to even higher levels than seen before. One of the most uncomfortable stretches over the last half century took place during the oil embargo days of the early and mid-1970s.   Market valuations fell to the high single digits, a level that was about half the historic average.   For investors, this was one of the great sales of all time.   Those who had the courage to get aboard reaped huge rewards. More recent pullbacks of note took place during the dot.com days of the turn of the millennium and the banking crisis of 2008-9.   The former period was marked by what appeared to be investors’ absolute indifference to longstanding measures of reasona...
Post a Comment
Read more