Skip to main content

Sound Advice: September 10 , 2025

What are the advantages and disadvantages of robo advisers? 

Advantages of Robo-Advisers

  • Lower Fees: Robo-advisers typically charge much less than traditional human advisers, with management fees often ranging from 0.25% to 0.50% per year, compared to 1% or more for traditional advisers.
  • Low Minimums & Easy Onboarding: Many robo-advisers offer low or no account minimums, making them accessible to beginners and those with modest investment amounts. The sign-up process is usually straightforward and fully online.
  • Automated, Hands-Off Management: Portfolios are automatically rebalanced, and asset allocations are adjusted based on your goals and risk tolerance. This "set-and-forget" aspect is ideal for investors who want minimal involvement.
  • Evidence-Based Algorithms: Many use investment models inspired by accepted financial theories, aiming to maximize returns for a given level of risk.
  • Tax-Loss Harvesting: Some offer automatic tax-loss harvesting, selling investments at a loss to offset gains elsewhere, which can reduce your tax bill.
  • Removes Human Bias: Automated decisions aren’t influenced by human emotions or biases, resulting in potentially more logical investment choices.
  • 24/7 Monitoring: Robo-advisers continually monitor portfolios and make adjustments as needed, regardless of time or market changes.
  • Broad Accessibility: They expand access to professional investment management, especially for those who wouldn't otherwise afford a human adviser. 

Disadvantages of Robo-Advisors

  • Limited Personalization: Robo-advisors can’t fully tailor strategies to unique circumstances, complex financial situations, or mixed investment portfolios the way human advisors can.
  • THERE IS NO ONE TO CALL WHEN THE GOING GETS ROUGH.
  • Limited Flexibility & Investment Options: Choices may be constrained to predefined portfolios or funds, limiting customization and the ability to, for example, pick individual stocks or advanced securities.
  • May Miss Nuances: Algorithms process based on data inputs and may not fully comprehend sudden life changes, unique goals or factors outside preset questionnaires.
  • Can Overlook Complete Financial Picture: Robo-advisers usually manage just the investments on their own platform and may not take into account all your wealth, liabilities or tax situation unless you manually aggregate everything.
  • Potential for Higher Total Costs: Although management fees are lower, you may still incur fund expenses (like ETF fees) and, in some cases, additional monthly or transaction fees.
  • Performance in Market Crashes: During severe volatility, automated algorithms might not respond with the nuance and flexibility of an experienced human.
  • Regulatory Gaps: The rapid evolution of AI-based advisors has sometimes outpaced legal oversight, potentially exposing investors to risks or gaps in consumer protection.

Summary Table

Advantage

Disadvantage

Low fees and easy access

Limits on personalization

Automated management

Lack of human guidance

Tax-loss harvesting

Fewer investment choices

Removes human bias

May miss life nuances

24/7 monitoring

Can overlook full financial picture

In summary: Robo-advisors may offer cost-effective, convenient, and hands-off investment management suited to many beginners or hands-off investors. Even so, the lack of personalization, limited investment choices, and absence of personal advice may not fit everyone, especially those with complex or evolving financial needs. For those willing to spend limited time learning the basics, constructing portfolios, and monitoring ongoing  developments, the Do It Yourself approach will be less costly and quite likely more productive.

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Sound Advice: January 3, 2025

2025 Market Forecasts: Stupidity Taken To An Extreme   If you know anything about stock market performance, you can only gag at the nonsense “esteemed forecasters” are now putting forth about the prospective path of stocks in the year ahead.   Our cousins in the UK would call this rubbish.   I would not be as kind. Leading the Ship of Fools is the forecast from the Chief Investment Strategist at Oppenheimer who is looking for a year-end 2025 level for the Standard & Poor’s Index of 7,100, a whopping 21% increase from the most recent standing.   Indeed, most of these folks are looking for double-digit gains.   Only two expect stocks to weaken. In the last 30 years, the market has risen by more than 20% only 15 times.   The exceptional span during that time was 1996-1999, which accounted for four of those jumps.   What followed in 2000 through 2002 was the polar opposite: 2000:      -9.1% 2001:     -11.9% ...
Post a Comment
Read more

Sound Advice: March 10, 2021

The ABCs of Stock Picking After decades of analyzing stocks (and funds) and investing for clients, I'm happy to share in plain English what's involved, what works, and what doesn't.  Keep in mind the reality that successful stock picking is an effort to maintain a good batting average. In baseball, a batting average of .300 or better is considered quite good.  With stock picking, you need to do better than .600, which means you have many more winners than losers. No one gets it right all of the time.  It's not even close.  Wall Street shops all have their recommended lists and the financial media regularly hawk 10 stocks to buy now. Following that road usually is a direct route to disaster.  Don't be tempted. Let's begin with the big picture: The stock market goes up and down over time, but the long-term trend is up.  When there's a rally under way, everyone feels like a genius.  When the market hits an air pocket, though, with few exception...
Post a Comment
Read more

Sound Advice: January 15, 2025

Why investors shouldn't pay attention to Wall Street forecasts   Investors shouldn't pay attention to Wall Street forecasts for several compelling reasons: Poor accuracy Wall Street forecasts have a terrible track record of accuracy. Studies show that their predictions are often no better than random chance, with accuracy rates as low as 47%   Some prominent analysts even perform worse, with accuracy ratings as low as 35% Consistent overestimation Analysts consistently overestimate earnings growth, predicting 10-12%                 annual growth when the reality is closer to 6%.   This overoptimism can                 lead investors to make overly aggressive bets in the market. Inability to predict unpredictable events The stock market is influenced by numerous unpredictable factors, including geopolitical events, technological changes, and company-specific news.   Anal...
Post a Comment
Read more