Skip to main content

Sound Advice: August 20, 2025

Why you should ignore commercials about investing 

Ignoring commercials about investing is often a wise move, and here’s why:

1. They’re Sales Pitches, Not Financial Advice

Commercials are designed to sell — not educate.  Whether it's a brokerage, crypto app or a “miracle” stock-picking service, their primary goal is to get your money, not help you build long-term wealth.  They're advertising, not advising.

2. They Oversimplify Complex Decisions

Investing is deeply personal and depends on your goals, risk tolerance, time horizon, and financial situation.  A 30-second ad can’t possibly account for that.  They make it seem easy, but real investing requires thoughtful planning and understanding.

3. They Prey on Emotion

Commercials often use fear of missing out (FOMO), urgency (“limited time offer”), or dreams of quick riches.  This emotional manipulation pushes impulsive decisions — which is the opposite of sound investing.

4. They Often Push Risky or Overhyped Products

If a commercial is promoting something like:

  • Day trading platforms
  • Penny stocks
  • "Guaranteed" returns

Hot crypto tokens
…it’s usually a red flag.  Solid investments (like index funds, retirement accounts or long-term diversified portfolios) don’t need flashy advertising.

5. True Experts Don’t Advertise Like That

Respected financial advisors don’t rely on infomercials or YouTube ads promising “10x returns.”  Instead, they build reputations through qualifications, referrals, and transparency.

6. Hidden Fees and Conflicts of Interest

Many advertised investment services downplay or hide their fees.  High commissions, management fees, or conflicts of interest can eat away at your returns — and you might not find out until it’s too late.

In Short:

Good investing is boring.  It’s about discipline, not hype.  The best investment advice comes from trusted sources, not flashy commercials.


N. Russell Wayne

Weston, CT  06883

203-895-8877

www.soundasset.blogspot.com

 

 

 

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Sound Advice: July 16, 2025

Fixed annuities are poor investments Fixed annuities are often criticized as poor investments for several reasons, despite their reputation for providing stable, predictable income.  Here are the key drawbacks and concerns:   High Fees and Commissions Internal Fees:  Fixed annuities can carry a range of fees, including administrative charges, mortality expense risk fees, and rider fees. These can add up to 2%–4% per year, significantly eroding returns over time. Commissions:  Sales agents and financial advisors often receive high commissions for selling annuities—sometimes as much as 5%–8% of the invested amount. This creates a financial incentive for advisers to recommend them, even when they may not be the best fit for the client. Comparison to Other Investments:  Mutual funds and ETFs typically have much lower fees and commissions, making them more cost-effective for long-term growth. Limited Growth a...

Sound Advice: October 8, 2025

How many investors have outperformed the stock market over the last 20 years? Very few investors have outperformed the stock market over the past 20 years.   Data shows that only about 6% to 8% of actively managed equity funds in the U.S. beat the market over this period, with the vast majority—over 90%—underperforming the S&P 500 or equivalent broad indexes. Percentage of Investors Beating the Market Only 8% of equity funds investing in large companies managed to outperform the market over a recent 20-year span. About 94% of all domestic funds underperformed the S&P 1500 Composite Index from 2005-2024. Over shorter timeframes (5-10 years), typically fewer than 15-20% of fund managers beat the S&P 500, and performance persistence is rare. Why It Is Rare The S&P 500’s high returns have proven immensely difficult to beat, especially as indexing has become popular and markets have ...

Sound Advice: January 3, 2025

2025 Market Forecasts: Stupidity Taken To An Extreme   If you know anything about stock market performance, you can only gag at the nonsense “esteemed forecasters” are now putting forth about the prospective path of stocks in the year ahead.   Our cousins in the UK would call this rubbish.   I would not be as kind. Leading the Ship of Fools is the forecast from the Chief Investment Strategist at Oppenheimer who is looking for a year-end 2025 level for the Standard & Poor’s Index of 7,100, a whopping 21% increase from the most recent standing.   Indeed, most of these folks are looking for double-digit gains.   Only two expect stocks to weaken. In the last 30 years, the market has risen by more than 20% only 15 times.   The exceptional span during that time was 1996-1999, which accounted for four of those jumps.   What followed in 2000 through 2002 was the polar opposite: 2000:      -9.1% 2001:     -11.9% ...