Skip to main content

Sound Advice: July 9, 2025

What changes are likely in Social Security as available funding runs out?

As Social Security’s available funding runs out—most notably, with the Old-Age and Survivors Insurance (OASI) Trust Fund projected to be depleted in 2033 and the combined retirement and disability (OASDI) funds likely exhausted by 2035—several significant changes are expected if current laws remain unchanged:

  • Benefit Reductions: When trust fund reserves are depleted, Social Security will only be able to pay benefits from current payroll tax revenues. According to the 2024 trustees’ report, this would mean that only about 79% of scheduled benefits could be paid for OASI recipients starting in 2033, or about 83% for the combined OASDI program if reserves are exhausted in 2035. This translates to a roughly 17–21% cut in monthly benefits for recipients.
  • Pressure for Legislative Action: Lawmakers will face increasing pressure to reform Social Security before the trust funds are exhausted. Options might include raising payroll taxes, increasing the retirement age, adjusting benefit formulas, or some combination of these measures.
  • Potential for General Fund Transfers: Although current law prohibits the use of general government funds to cover Social Security shortfalls, there could be political pressure to allow such transfers or borrowing, but this would require legislative changes.
  • Impact on Beneficiaries: Millions of Americans, especially those who rely heavily on Social Security for retirement income, would face direct financial hardship if benefits are reduced. The program currently supports about 67 million beneficiaries, mostly retirees.

Unless Congress acts to address the funding shortfall, the most likely immediate change will be a reduction in benefit payments once the trust funds are depleted. The size of the cut depends on which fund is considered, but it could be as high as a 21% reduction in monthly checks for retirees and survivors.

N. Russell Wayne

Weston, CT  06883

203-895-8877

www.soundasset.blogspot.com

 

 

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Sound Advice: July 16, 2025

Fixed annuities are poor investments Fixed annuities are often criticized as poor investments for several reasons, despite their reputation for providing stable, predictable income.  Here are the key drawbacks and concerns:   High Fees and Commissions Internal Fees:  Fixed annuities can carry a range of fees, including administrative charges, mortality expense risk fees, and rider fees. These can add up to 2%–4% per year, significantly eroding returns over time. Commissions:  Sales agents and financial advisors often receive high commissions for selling annuities—sometimes as much as 5%–8% of the invested amount. This creates a financial incentive for advisers to recommend them, even when they may not be the best fit for the client. Comparison to Other Investments:  Mutual funds and ETFs typically have much lower fees and commissions, making them more cost-effective for long-term growth. Limited Growth a...

Sound Advice: October 8, 2025

How many investors have outperformed the stock market over the last 20 years? Very few investors have outperformed the stock market over the past 20 years.   Data shows that only about 6% to 8% of actively managed equity funds in the U.S. beat the market over this period, with the vast majority—over 90%—underperforming the S&P 500 or equivalent broad indexes. Percentage of Investors Beating the Market Only 8% of equity funds investing in large companies managed to outperform the market over a recent 20-year span. About 94% of all domestic funds underperformed the S&P 1500 Composite Index from 2005-2024. Over shorter timeframes (5-10 years), typically fewer than 15-20% of fund managers beat the S&P 500, and performance persistence is rare. Why It Is Rare The S&P 500’s high returns have proven immensely difficult to beat, especially as indexing has become popular and markets have ...

Sound Advice: January 15, 2025

Why investors shouldn't pay attention to Wall Street forecasts   Investors shouldn't pay attention to Wall Street forecasts for several compelling reasons: Poor accuracy Wall Street forecasts have a terrible track record of accuracy. Studies show that their predictions are often no better than random chance, with accuracy rates as low as 47%   Some prominent analysts even perform worse, with accuracy ratings as low as 35% Consistent overestimation Analysts consistently overestimate earnings growth, predicting 10-12%                 annual growth when the reality is closer to 6%.   This overoptimism can                 lead investors to make overly aggressive bets in the market. Inability to predict unpredictable events The stock market is influenced by numerous unpredictable factors, including geopolitical events, technological changes, and company-specific news.   Anal...