Skip to main content

Sound Advice: September 11, 2024

Why Economists are usually wrong about future prospects

Economists often face challenges in predicting future economic conditions accurately for several reasons: 

  1. Complexity of the Economy: The economy is a complex system with countless interacting variables, including consumer behavior, government policies, global events, and technological changes. This complexity makes it difficult to model and predict outcomes precisely.
  2. Uncertainty and Randomness: Economic events are influenced by many unpredictable factors, such as natural disasters, geopolitical events or sudden shifts in consumer sentiment. These elements introduce a high degree of uncertainty and randomness into forecasts.
  3. Assumptions and Models: Economic predictions are based on models that rely on certain assumptions. If these assumptions don't hold true or if the model's structure is flawed, predictions can be off. Economic models are simplifications of reality and may not capture all nuances.
  4. Changing Dynamics: The economy is constantly evolving. New technologies, regulations, and market trends can quickly alter economic conditions in ways that models and forecasts might not anticipate.
  5. Behavioral Factors: Human behavior can be unpredictable. Economic models often assume rational behavior, but real-world decisions are influenced by emotions, biases, and social factors, which can lead to unexpected outcomes.
  6. Policy Responses: Governments and central banks often change policies in response to economic conditions. These policy shifts can have significant effects on the economy, sometimes in ways that are difficult to predict.
  7. Data Limitations: Economists rely on historical data to make predictions. The problem is that historical data may not always be a reliable guide to the future, especially in times of significant change or when new data is limited.
  8. Overconfidence: There is sometimes a tendency among economists to be overconfident in their predictions, leading to an underestimation of uncertainty and potential for error.

Despite these challenges, economists provide some (not many) valuable insights and frameworks for understanding economic trends and guiding policy. Although forecasts are rarely accurate, they may provide limited help in planning and decision-making by highlighting potential risks and opportunities.

 N. Russell Wayne

Weston, CT  06883

203-895-8877

www.soundasset.blogspot.com

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Sound Advice: January 3, 2025

2025 Market Forecasts: Stupidity Taken To An Extreme   If you know anything about stock market performance, you can only gag at the nonsense “esteemed forecasters” are now putting forth about the prospective path of stocks in the year ahead.   Our cousins in the UK would call this rubbish.   I would not be as kind. Leading the Ship of Fools is the forecast from the Chief Investment Strategist at Oppenheimer who is looking for a year-end 2025 level for the Standard & Poor’s Index of 7,100, a whopping 21% increase from the most recent standing.   Indeed, most of these folks are looking for double-digit gains.   Only two expect stocks to weaken. In the last 30 years, the market has risen by more than 20% only 15 times.   The exceptional span during that time was 1996-1999, which accounted for four of those jumps.   What followed in 2000 through 2002 was the polar opposite: 2000:      -9.1% 2001:     -11.9% ...

Sound Advice: January 15, 2025

Why investors shouldn't pay attention to Wall Street forecasts   Investors shouldn't pay attention to Wall Street forecasts for several compelling reasons: Poor accuracy Wall Street forecasts have a terrible track record of accuracy. Studies show that their predictions are often no better than random chance, with accuracy rates as low as 47%   Some prominent analysts even perform worse, with accuracy ratings as low as 35% Consistent overestimation Analysts consistently overestimate earnings growth, predicting 10-12%                 annual growth when the reality is closer to 6%.   This overoptimism can                 lead investors to make overly aggressive bets in the market. Inability to predict unpredictable events The stock market is influenced by numerous unpredictable factors, including geopolitical events, technological changes, and company-specific news.   Anal...

Sound Advice: July 16, 2025

Fixed annuities are poor investments Fixed annuities are often criticized as poor investments for several reasons, despite their reputation for providing stable, predictable income.  Here are the key drawbacks and concerns:   High Fees and Commissions Internal Fees:  Fixed annuities can carry a range of fees, including administrative charges, mortality expense risk fees, and rider fees. These can add up to 2%–4% per year, significantly eroding returns over time. Commissions:  Sales agents and financial advisors often receive high commissions for selling annuities—sometimes as much as 5%–8% of the invested amount. This creates a financial incentive for advisers to recommend them, even when they may not be the best fit for the client. Comparison to Other Investments:  Mutual funds and ETFs typically have much lower fees and commissions, making them more cost-effective for long-term growth. Limited Growth a...