Skip to main content

Sound Advice: August 7, 2024

Don’t Depend on the Better Business Bureau

The dependability of Better Business Bureau (BBB) ratings can be questioned for several reasons:

1.     Subjectivity in Ratings: BBB ratings are not purely objective and can be influenced by various factors such as the volume of complaints received, the speed of complaint resolution, and whether the business responds to complaints. These factors may not always reflect the overall quality or reliability of a business.

2.     Not Based on Reviews or Complaints: That’s odd since comments, both positive and negative, from parties who had actually interacted should have been considered.  Perhaps a Ouija Board played a role in the grades assigned.

3.     Limited Criteria: The criteria used by the BBB to assign ratings may not cover all aspects of a business's operations or customer satisfaction. Some businesses may receive lower ratings due to factors that are not indicative of their overall performance.

4.     Pay-to-Play Allegations: There have been criticisms that BBB accreditation and higher ratings can sometimes be influenced by businesses paying membership fees or becoming accredited members. BBB accreditation costs $650 a year and gives the business owner the opportunity to present what appears to be a more impressive image, but in fact there is no difference.

5.     Varied Local Chapters: BBB ratings can vary between different local chapters, as each chapter operates independently. This inconsistency can lead to different ratings for the same business depending on its location.

6.     Alternative Sources of Information: In addition to BBB ratings, consumers can access reviews on other platforms such as Google, Yelp or industry-specific review sites. These sources may provide a broader range of opinions and experiences from customers.

7.     Not Mandatory or Comprehensive: Businesses are not required to be accredited by the BBB, and not all businesses choose to participate. This can limit the availability of BBB ratings for certain businesses.

Given these factors, although BBB ratings can provide some insight into a business's reputation and handling of consumer complaints, they should be considered alongside other sources of information to form a balanced assessment. Relying solely on BBB ratings may not provide a complete picture of a business's reliability or quality.

N. Russell Wayne

Weston, CT

Any questions: please contact me at nrwayne@soundasset.com

203-895-8877

www.soundasset.blogspot.com

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Sound Advice: July 16, 2025

Fixed annuities are poor investments Fixed annuities are often criticized as poor investments for several reasons, despite their reputation for providing stable, predictable income.  Here are the key drawbacks and concerns:   High Fees and Commissions Internal Fees:  Fixed annuities can carry a range of fees, including administrative charges, mortality expense risk fees, and rider fees. These can add up to 2%–4% per year, significantly eroding returns over time. Commissions:  Sales agents and financial advisors often receive high commissions for selling annuities—sometimes as much as 5%–8% of the invested amount. This creates a financial incentive for advisers to recommend them, even when they may not be the best fit for the client. Comparison to Other Investments:  Mutual funds and ETFs typically have much lower fees and commissions, making them more cost-effective for long-term growth. Limited Growth a...
Post a Comment
Read more

Sound Advice: October 8, 2025

How many investors have outperformed the stock market over the last 20 years? Very few investors have outperformed the stock market over the past 20 years.   Data shows that only about 6% to 8% of actively managed equity funds in the U.S. beat the market over this period, with the vast majority—over 90%—underperforming the S&P 500 or equivalent broad indexes. Percentage of Investors Beating the Market Only 8% of equity funds investing in large companies managed to outperform the market over a recent 20-year span. About 94% of all domestic funds underperformed the S&P 1500 Composite Index from 2005-2024. Over shorter timeframes (5-10 years), typically fewer than 15-20% of fund managers beat the S&P 500, and performance persistence is rare. Why It Is Rare The S&P 500’s high returns have proven immensely difficult to beat, especially as indexing has become popular and markets have ...
Post a Comment
Read more

Sound Advice: January 15, 2025

Why investors shouldn't pay attention to Wall Street forecasts   Investors shouldn't pay attention to Wall Street forecasts for several compelling reasons: Poor accuracy Wall Street forecasts have a terrible track record of accuracy. Studies show that their predictions are often no better than random chance, with accuracy rates as low as 47%   Some prominent analysts even perform worse, with accuracy ratings as low as 35% Consistent overestimation Analysts consistently overestimate earnings growth, predicting 10-12%                 annual growth when the reality is closer to 6%.   This overoptimism can                 lead investors to make overly aggressive bets in the market. Inability to predict unpredictable events The stock market is influenced by numerous unpredictable factors, including geopolitical events, technological changes, and company-specific news.   Anal...
Post a Comment
Read more