Skip to main content

Sound Advice: August 7, 2024

Don’t Depend on the Better Business Bureau

The dependability of Better Business Bureau (BBB) ratings can be questioned for several reasons:

1.     Subjectivity in Ratings: BBB ratings are not purely objective and can be influenced by various factors such as the volume of complaints received, the speed of complaint resolution, and whether the business responds to complaints. These factors may not always reflect the overall quality or reliability of a business.

2.     Not Based on Reviews or Complaints: That’s odd since comments, both positive and negative, from parties who had actually interacted should have been considered.  Perhaps a Ouija Board played a role in the grades assigned.

3.     Limited Criteria: The criteria used by the BBB to assign ratings may not cover all aspects of a business's operations or customer satisfaction. Some businesses may receive lower ratings due to factors that are not indicative of their overall performance.

4.     Pay-to-Play Allegations: There have been criticisms that BBB accreditation and higher ratings can sometimes be influenced by businesses paying membership fees or becoming accredited members. BBB accreditation costs $650 a year and gives the business owner the opportunity to present what appears to be a more impressive image, but in fact there is no difference.

5.     Varied Local Chapters: BBB ratings can vary between different local chapters, as each chapter operates independently. This inconsistency can lead to different ratings for the same business depending on its location.

6.     Alternative Sources of Information: In addition to BBB ratings, consumers can access reviews on other platforms such as Google, Yelp or industry-specific review sites. These sources may provide a broader range of opinions and experiences from customers.

7.     Not Mandatory or Comprehensive: Businesses are not required to be accredited by the BBB, and not all businesses choose to participate. This can limit the availability of BBB ratings for certain businesses.

Given these factors, although BBB ratings can provide some insight into a business's reputation and handling of consumer complaints, they should be considered alongside other sources of information to form a balanced assessment. Relying solely on BBB ratings may not provide a complete picture of a business's reliability or quality.

N. Russell Wayne

Weston, CT

Any questions: please contact me at nrwayne@soundasset.com

203-895-8877

www.soundasset.blogspot.com

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Sound Advice: March 10, 2021

The ABCs of Stock Picking After decades of analyzing stocks (and funds) and investing for clients, I'm happy to share in plain English what's involved, what works, and what doesn't.  Keep in mind the reality that successful stock picking is an effort to maintain a good batting average. In baseball, a batting average of .300 or better is considered quite good.  With stock picking, you need to do better than .600, which means you have many more winners than losers. No one gets it right all of the time.  It's not even close.  Wall Street shops all have their recommended lists and the financial media regularly hawk 10 stocks to buy now. Following that road usually is a direct route to disaster.  Don't be tempted. Let's begin with the big picture: The stock market goes up and down over time, but the long-term trend is up.  When there's a rally under way, everyone feels like a genius.  When the market hits an air pocket, though, with few exception...

Sound Advice: January 3, 2025

2025 Market Forecasts: Stupidity Taken To An Extreme   If you know anything about stock market performance, you can only gag at the nonsense “esteemed forecasters” are now putting forth about the prospective path of stocks in the year ahead.   Our cousins in the UK would call this rubbish.   I would not be as kind. Leading the Ship of Fools is the forecast from the Chief Investment Strategist at Oppenheimer who is looking for a year-end 2025 level for the Standard & Poor’s Index of 7,100, a whopping 21% increase from the most recent standing.   Indeed, most of these folks are looking for double-digit gains.   Only two expect stocks to weaken. In the last 30 years, the market has risen by more than 20% only 15 times.   The exceptional span during that time was 1996-1999, which accounted for four of those jumps.   What followed in 2000 through 2002 was the polar opposite: 2000:      -9.1% 2001:     -11.9% ...

Sound Advice: January 15, 2025

Why investors shouldn't pay attention to Wall Street forecasts   Investors shouldn't pay attention to Wall Street forecasts for several compelling reasons: Poor accuracy Wall Street forecasts have a terrible track record of accuracy. Studies show that their predictions are often no better than random chance, with accuracy rates as low as 47%   Some prominent analysts even perform worse, with accuracy ratings as low as 35% Consistent overestimation Analysts consistently overestimate earnings growth, predicting 10-12%                 annual growth when the reality is closer to 6%.   This overoptimism can                 lead investors to make overly aggressive bets in the market. Inability to predict unpredictable events The stock market is influenced by numerous unpredictable factors, including geopolitical events, technological changes, and company-specific news.   Anal...