Skip to main content

Sound Advice: June 19, 2024

Think You’re Diversified?  Think Again

Far too often folks think that buying a bunch of mutual funds will give them the diversification they need, but the reality is that most mutual funds are first cousins of lemmings.  As mutual funds gain popularity, their assets increase.  As their assets increase, the universe of stocks they can buy shrinks. Why is that?  Because the size they need to buy increases.

When a fund has only $100 million in assets, it typically will have individual commitments of $1-3 million.  At that level, the choice is either a sizable commitment in a smaller company or a relatively small piece of a larger company. 

But when a fund has $10 billion in assets, each of its commitments will be on the order of $100 million or more.  That will eliminate many smaller companies simply because the fund would end up being a major shareholder of those companies.

As funds grow, the choices of stocks are fewer and the likelihood of duplication of holdings from fund to fund increases dramatically.  So even if you own 10 funds, it’s likely that many of the holdings will be duplicated across the board.

To get a better handle on this, we took a closer look at 10 of the more widely held funds.

The result: Nvidia was held by all funds.  Microsoft and Alphabet (Google) were held by nine funds.  Meta (Facebook) was held by eight funds.  Amazon and Apple were held by seven funds.

 

 

 

 

 

Fidelity Blue Chip

Growth Fund of Amer.

Fidelity Mega Cap

Payson Total Return

Fidelity Controfund

Nvidia

Microsoft

Microsoft

Apple

Meta

Microsoft

Meta

Exxon Mobil

Broadcom

Berkshire Hathaway

Amazon

Alphabet

Wells Fargo

Nvidia

Nvidia

Apple

Amazon

Nvidia

WEX, Inc.

Microsoft

Alphabet

Broadcom

GE

Meta

Amazon

Meta

Nvidia

Apple

Microsoft

Lilly

Marvell

Lilly

Bank of America

CDW

Apple

Liffy

GE

Meta

Visa

Alphabet A

Netflix

Netflix

Boeing

Lam Research

Alphabet B

Snap

Mastercard

Alphabet

Wells Fargo

Amphenol

Wellington Fund

T. Rowe Price Blue Chip

Oakmark Fund

T. Rowe Cap. Apprec.

State St. Core Equity

Microsoft

Microsoft

Alphabet

Microsoft

Nvidia

Alphabet

Amazon

Citi

Alphabet

Microsoft

Amazon

Apple

Wells Fargo

United Health

Apple

Apple

Alphabet

Schwab

Amazon

Alphabet

Meta

Meta

GM

Revvity

Amazon

JP Morgan

Lilly

Deere

Cdn Nat. Resources

Meta

Merck

Visa

AIG

Becton Dickinson

Broadcom

Progressive

United Health

Conoco Phillip

Waste Connections

Merck

Nvidia

Mastercard

Nvidia

Nvidia

United Health

United Health

Nvidia

Fivserv

Fortive

S&P Global

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Forget about diversifying by buying multiple actively managed mutual funds.  Better to buy one low-cost index fund.  You’ll save money and get the same equity diversification from that one fund.

 

N. Russell Wayne

Weston, CT

Any questions: please contact me at nrwayne@soundasset.com

203-895-8877

www.soundasset.blogspot.com

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Sound Advice: January 3, 2025

2025 Market Forecasts: Stupidity Taken To An Extreme   If you know anything about stock market performance, you can only gag at the nonsense “esteemed forecasters” are now putting forth about the prospective path of stocks in the year ahead.   Our cousins in the UK would call this rubbish.   I would not be as kind. Leading the Ship of Fools is the forecast from the Chief Investment Strategist at Oppenheimer who is looking for a year-end 2025 level for the Standard & Poor’s Index of 7,100, a whopping 21% increase from the most recent standing.   Indeed, most of these folks are looking for double-digit gains.   Only two expect stocks to weaken. In the last 30 years, the market has risen by more than 20% only 15 times.   The exceptional span during that time was 1996-1999, which accounted for four of those jumps.   What followed in 2000 through 2002 was the polar opposite: 2000:      -9.1% 2001:     -11.9% ...

Sound Advice: January 15, 2025

Why investors shouldn't pay attention to Wall Street forecasts   Investors shouldn't pay attention to Wall Street forecasts for several compelling reasons: Poor accuracy Wall Street forecasts have a terrible track record of accuracy. Studies show that their predictions are often no better than random chance, with accuracy rates as low as 47%   Some prominent analysts even perform worse, with accuracy ratings as low as 35% Consistent overestimation Analysts consistently overestimate earnings growth, predicting 10-12%                 annual growth when the reality is closer to 6%.   This overoptimism can                 lead investors to make overly aggressive bets in the market. Inability to predict unpredictable events The stock market is influenced by numerous unpredictable factors, including geopolitical events, technological changes, and company-specific news.   Anal...

Sound Advice: October 12, 2022

More Pain Ahead? It’s been a difficult year for the investment markets, but tough times have happened before and they will certainly happen again.   Sometimes recoveries are relatively quick and sometimes a hefty dose of patience is required.   No two downdrafts are alike, but the net result is always a rebound to even higher levels than seen before. One of the most uncomfortable stretches over the last half century took place during the oil embargo days of the early and mid-1970s.   Market valuations fell to the high single digits, a level that was about half the historic average.   For investors, this was one of the great sales of all time.   Those who had the courage to get aboard reaped huge rewards. More recent pullbacks of note took place during the dot.com days of the turn of the millennium and the banking crisis of 2008-9.   The former period was marked by what appeared to be investors’ absolute indifference to longstanding measures of reasona...