Skip to main content

Sound Advice: April 17, 2024

HOW TO SELECT A FINANCIAL ADVISER

Financial advisers usually come under the following headings: stockbrokers, Registered Investment Advisers, and individuals with the following designations: CFP®, CFA, CLU, ChFC.  Most other lettered designations are misleading.  Some, in fact, are available online for only a small fee and a 10-question test.

The most common financial adviser is a stockbroker.  Years ago, a stockbroker was known as a customer’s man.  That was in the good old days when trading commissions were fixed and the cost of individual trades was $100 to $200 or more.  These days, commissions are rarely over $10 and often free, regardless of the size of the order.

The key hurdle for prospective stockbrokers is the Series 7 exam.  It’s a 3 hour and 45 minute test that is little more than a check on one’s memory.  The material covered includes such areas as industry regulations, basic economics, security types, and simple investment concepts.  It does not in any way confirm an individual’s ability to evaluate securities or put together well-conceived portfolios.  Without years of experience combined with extensive focused study, a stockbroker is only a salesman.

Stockbrokers are required to offer securities that are suitable for investors. When there is a choice between similar securities where one offers a greater benefit to the stockbroker, you can guess which one will get the stronger sales pitch.  Often, there’s an incentive to the stockbroker, whether or not it’s in the best interest of the investor.

Far better to offer what is in the best interest of the investor.  That is the essence of the fiduciary standard, which is what is required of Registered Investment Advisers. 

In contrast, stockbrokers follow the suitability standard, which does not put the investor’s interest first.  It just means that the securities offered should be reasonably suitable for the investor, even though they may not be the best choice.

A few stockbrokers rise above the crowd, but most are little more than glorified salespeople hawking whatever their firms are recommending.

There are financial advisers with either CLU or ChFC designations. CLU is a Chartered Life Underwriter, basically an insurance salesperson who will suggest insurance products to solve financial problems even if they are not the best ways to do so.  ChFC is a Chartered Financial Consultant, a designation for which no comprehensive board exam is required.  Someone with a ChFC designation is not a mainstream financial adviser.

Far more prestigious is a CFA, Chartered Financial Analyst.  CFAs are primarily analysts working with large money management companies.

Among financial advisers for individuals, the highest designation is Certified Financial Planner or CFP®.  CFP® training is far more rigorous and focused specifically on critical issues such as investments, insurance, income taxes, education planning, retirement planning, and estate planning.  The CFP® exam consists of 170 questions to be answered over two three-hour sessions.  The pass rate is generally between 50% and 60%.  As a group, CFP®s are the most qualified financial advisers for individuals.

CFP® certification demands a deep knowledge and commitment to personal financial planning.  More and more consumers seeking financial planning help are looking for planners of exceptional quality who adhere to the highest standard.  Nearly 9 in 10 consumers say they would feel more confident working with an adviser who is certified in financial planning.

A CFP® is uniquely qualified to help individuals pull all their finances together, solve financial problems, and make a plan to achieve their financial goals.  Individuals certified by the CFP® Board have taken the extra step to demonstrate their professionalism by voluntarily submitting to the rigorous CFP® certification, a process that includes education, examination, experience, and ethical requirements.  These standards are called the “the four Es” and they are four important reasons why those with the CFP® designation are the most appropriate providers of personal financial advice.

N. Russell Wayne

Weston, CT

Any questions: please contact me at nrwayne@soundasset.com

203-895-8877 

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Sound Advice: July 16, 2025

Fixed annuities are poor investments Fixed annuities are often criticized as poor investments for several reasons, despite their reputation for providing stable, predictable income.  Here are the key drawbacks and concerns:   High Fees and Commissions Internal Fees:  Fixed annuities can carry a range of fees, including administrative charges, mortality expense risk fees, and rider fees. These can add up to 2%–4% per year, significantly eroding returns over time. Commissions:  Sales agents and financial advisors often receive high commissions for selling annuities—sometimes as much as 5%–8% of the invested amount. This creates a financial incentive for advisers to recommend them, even when they may not be the best fit for the client. Comparison to Other Investments:  Mutual funds and ETFs typically have much lower fees and commissions, making them more cost-effective for long-term growth. Limited Growth a...
Post a Comment
Read more

Sound Advice: October 8, 2025

How many investors have outperformed the stock market over the last 20 years? Very few investors have outperformed the stock market over the past 20 years.   Data shows that only about 6% to 8% of actively managed equity funds in the U.S. beat the market over this period, with the vast majority—over 90%—underperforming the S&P 500 or equivalent broad indexes. Percentage of Investors Beating the Market Only 8% of equity funds investing in large companies managed to outperform the market over a recent 20-year span. About 94% of all domestic funds underperformed the S&P 1500 Composite Index from 2005-2024. Over shorter timeframes (5-10 years), typically fewer than 15-20% of fund managers beat the S&P 500, and performance persistence is rare. Why It Is Rare The S&P 500’s high returns have proven immensely difficult to beat, especially as indexing has become popular and markets have ...
Post a Comment
Read more

Sound Advice: January 15, 2025

Why investors shouldn't pay attention to Wall Street forecasts   Investors shouldn't pay attention to Wall Street forecasts for several compelling reasons: Poor accuracy Wall Street forecasts have a terrible track record of accuracy. Studies show that their predictions are often no better than random chance, with accuracy rates as low as 47%   Some prominent analysts even perform worse, with accuracy ratings as low as 35% Consistent overestimation Analysts consistently overestimate earnings growth, predicting 10-12%                 annual growth when the reality is closer to 6%.   This overoptimism can                 lead investors to make overly aggressive bets in the market. Inability to predict unpredictable events The stock market is influenced by numerous unpredictable factors, including geopolitical events, technological changes, and company-specific news.   Anal...
Post a Comment
Read more