Skip to main content

Sound Advice: March 6, 2024

Sell Stocks in May and Buy Back in October?

The phrase "Sell in May and go away, come back in October" is a well-known adage in the stock market. Although it is well-known and may be supported by the market’s tendency to register two-thirds of its annual gains in the first and last quarters of the calendar year, that pattern doesn’t happen every year and may indeed be disrupted for several years at a time.

Following this advice blindly may not be the best strategy since the stock market is influenced by a wide range of factors, and historical patterns do not guarantee future performance.  Another key concern is the tax impact of selling and buying on this schedule, which may lead to higher tax costs, which could offset whatever gains may have been registered.

The idea behind the saying is that the stock market tends to underperform or be more volatile during the summer months, and investors might be better off selling their stocks in May and re-entering the market in October when conditions are presumed to be more favorable.  That’s an idea.  There may be others.  Whatever the reason, there is no such thing as a quick-and-dirty method of improving your investment results.

Although there may well be a historical basis for this pattern, it's crucial to remain aware that market conditions can vary from year to year, and the global economic landscape is constantly changing. Making investment decisions based solely on historical trends without considering current economic indicators, geopolitical events, and other relevant factors can be risky.

Investors are generally encouraged to adopt a more holistic and well-researched approach to investment decisions. Consider your financial goals, risk tolerance, and the overall economic environment when making decisions about buying or selling stocks. It's often a good idea to consult with a financial adviser who can provide personalized advice based on your specific situation.

The "Sell in May and go away" strategy is a historical pattern that has been useful over extended periods, but it is not a one-size-fits-all solution.  Better to base investment decisions on a comprehensive analysis of current market conditions and individual financial circumstances rather than what appears to be a straightforward, no-brain solution.

N. Russell Wayne

Sound Asset Management

Weston, CT

Any questions: please contact me at nrwayne@soundasset.com

203-895-8877

www.soundasset.blogspot.com

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Sound Advice: July 16, 2025

Fixed annuities are poor investments Fixed annuities are often criticized as poor investments for several reasons, despite their reputation for providing stable, predictable income.  Here are the key drawbacks and concerns:   High Fees and Commissions Internal Fees:  Fixed annuities can carry a range of fees, including administrative charges, mortality expense risk fees, and rider fees. These can add up to 2%–4% per year, significantly eroding returns over time. Commissions:  Sales agents and financial advisors often receive high commissions for selling annuities—sometimes as much as 5%–8% of the invested amount. This creates a financial incentive for advisers to recommend them, even when they may not be the best fit for the client. Comparison to Other Investments:  Mutual funds and ETFs typically have much lower fees and commissions, making them more cost-effective for long-term growth. Limited Growth a...
Post a Comment
Read more

Sound Advice: October 8, 2025

How many investors have outperformed the stock market over the last 20 years? Very few investors have outperformed the stock market over the past 20 years.   Data shows that only about 6% to 8% of actively managed equity funds in the U.S. beat the market over this period, with the vast majority—over 90%—underperforming the S&P 500 or equivalent broad indexes. Percentage of Investors Beating the Market Only 8% of equity funds investing in large companies managed to outperform the market over a recent 20-year span. About 94% of all domestic funds underperformed the S&P 1500 Composite Index from 2005-2024. Over shorter timeframes (5-10 years), typically fewer than 15-20% of fund managers beat the S&P 500, and performance persistence is rare. Why It Is Rare The S&P 500’s high returns have proven immensely difficult to beat, especially as indexing has become popular and markets have ...
Post a Comment
Read more

Sound Advice: January 15, 2025

Why investors shouldn't pay attention to Wall Street forecasts   Investors shouldn't pay attention to Wall Street forecasts for several compelling reasons: Poor accuracy Wall Street forecasts have a terrible track record of accuracy. Studies show that their predictions are often no better than random chance, with accuracy rates as low as 47%   Some prominent analysts even perform worse, with accuracy ratings as low as 35% Consistent overestimation Analysts consistently overestimate earnings growth, predicting 10-12%                 annual growth when the reality is closer to 6%.   This overoptimism can                 lead investors to make overly aggressive bets in the market. Inability to predict unpredictable events The stock market is influenced by numerous unpredictable factors, including geopolitical events, technological changes, and company-specific news.   Anal...
Post a Comment
Read more