Skip to main content

Sound Advice: March 20, 2024

Here’s Why No One Beats The Market Index

In Las Vegas, the house always wins.  And on Wall Street, the market always wins. Let me explain.

Although the media tends to focus on the Dow Jones Industrial Average, which includes only 30 of the largest companies, professional investors compare their results with the Standard & Poor’s 500 Index, a far broader contingent.

But there’s a hitch.  The hitch is that the impact of the company shares included in the index is determined by their overall value.  So it turns out that the top five companies (Apple, Alphabet, Google, Microsoft, and Nvidia) represent more than 21% of the value of the S&P 500.  The movements of these five stocks largely determine the overall movement of the index.

Over time, other mega cap stocks with strong performances may become increasingly important as their market capitalization (number of shares times the stock price) grows.  That provides an ongoing infusion of new market strength.  The only way professional money managers can keep up with the S&P is to follow the same replacement cycle.  With the S&P, it’s automatic.

Let’s not forget that actively managed funds have higher fees and trading costs compared to passively managed indexed funds.  Over time, these costs can eat into returns and make it harder for actively managed funds to outperform their benchmark.

Some managers may outperform the market for short periods, but maintaining that level of outperformance over the long term is challenging.  Strategies that have worked well in the past rarely have staying power.

And then there’s the matter of herd behavior, where fund managers may be reluctant to deviate significantly from the benchmark, limiting their ability to make contrarian or unconventional investment decisions.

It gets worse.  Professionals may face pressure to deliver short-term results, which can lead to a focus on quarterly or annual performance rather than a long-term investment horizon.  This short-term focus may hinder their ability to make patient, value-driven investment decisions.

Some active managers do outperform the market over certain periods, but consistently beating the market over the long term is a formidable challenge, one that invariably proves fruitless.

Why try to beat the house when you can be the house by choosing low-cost index funds that passively track the market index.  By doing so, you get broad exposure, minimal fees, and a portfolio that always wins.

 

N. Russell Wayne

Sound Asset Management

Weston, CT

Any questions: please contact me at nrwayne@soundasset.com

203-895-8877

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Sound Advice: January 3, 2025

2025 Market Forecasts: Stupidity Taken To An Extreme   If you know anything about stock market performance, you can only gag at the nonsense “esteemed forecasters” are now putting forth about the prospective path of stocks in the year ahead.   Our cousins in the UK would call this rubbish.   I would not be as kind. Leading the Ship of Fools is the forecast from the Chief Investment Strategist at Oppenheimer who is looking for a year-end 2025 level for the Standard & Poor’s Index of 7,100, a whopping 21% increase from the most recent standing.   Indeed, most of these folks are looking for double-digit gains.   Only two expect stocks to weaken. In the last 30 years, the market has risen by more than 20% only 15 times.   The exceptional span during that time was 1996-1999, which accounted for four of those jumps.   What followed in 2000 through 2002 was the polar opposite: 2000:      -9.1% 2001:     -11.9% ...
Post a Comment
Read more

Sound Advice: January 15, 2025

Why investors shouldn't pay attention to Wall Street forecasts   Investors shouldn't pay attention to Wall Street forecasts for several compelling reasons: Poor accuracy Wall Street forecasts have a terrible track record of accuracy. Studies show that their predictions are often no better than random chance, with accuracy rates as low as 47%   Some prominent analysts even perform worse, with accuracy ratings as low as 35% Consistent overestimation Analysts consistently overestimate earnings growth, predicting 10-12%                 annual growth when the reality is closer to 6%.   This overoptimism can                 lead investors to make overly aggressive bets in the market. Inability to predict unpredictable events The stock market is influenced by numerous unpredictable factors, including geopolitical events, technological changes, and company-specific news.   Anal...
Post a Comment
Read more

Sound Advice: October 12, 2022

More Pain Ahead? It’s been a difficult year for the investment markets, but tough times have happened before and they will certainly happen again.   Sometimes recoveries are relatively quick and sometimes a hefty dose of patience is required.   No two downdrafts are alike, but the net result is always a rebound to even higher levels than seen before. One of the most uncomfortable stretches over the last half century took place during the oil embargo days of the early and mid-1970s.   Market valuations fell to the high single digits, a level that was about half the historic average.   For investors, this was one of the great sales of all time.   Those who had the courage to get aboard reaped huge rewards. More recent pullbacks of note took place during the dot.com days of the turn of the millennium and the banking crisis of 2008-9.   The former period was marked by what appeared to be investors’ absolute indifference to longstanding measures of reasona...
Post a Comment
Read more