Skip to main content

Sound Advice: September 20, 2023

Target Prices? Really?

For some investors, the temptation to build portfolios by selecting stocks with the highest target prices, compared to current prices, is up there with believing in the tooth fairy. Yet Investopedia, one of the more competent websites, states the following:

“When it comes to evaluating stocks, target prices can be even more useful than the ratings of equity analysts. Strictly defined, a target price is an estimate of a stock's future price, based on earnings forecasts and assumed valuation multiples.”

That may be accurate, though neither should be taken seriously.  Let’s consider the merit of each.

Current prices for stocks are the products of the following equation: earnings per share (i.e., company net income divided by the number of common shares outstanding) times the price-earnings multiple, which is a numeric valuation of the earnings per share (EPS).  If EPS are $2.00 and the stock sells for 40, the price-earnings multiple is 20.

Target prices are forward-looking extrapolations.  In other words, projected future EPS times an assumed price-earnings multiple.  If the EPS for Company X may grow to $3.00 in five years and the price-earnings multiple remains at 20, one might conclude that the price will rise to 60.

That’s interesting, but deeply flawed since it’s largely a function of the annual rate of earnings growth.  If the rate slows, the price-earnings multiple may narrow.  If it accelerates, the multiple may expand.  Either way, it’s essential to be aware that stocks (and the overall stock market) rarely sell at what might be considered normal valuations.  So target prices are nothing more than crap shoots.

If target prices are essentially meaningless, buy, hold or sell recommendations are total nonsense.  It’s well known that the majority of recommendations are buys pushed by Wall Street houses looking to move large blocks of stock or to satisfy the gullibility of retail investors. Despite this preposterous proposition, there have never been any studies demonstrating that these recommendations are of any value.

Indeed, during my extended tenure at a prestigious investment advisory company, which published stock ratings based solely on quantitative information, a short-term deviation in the ratings method that included the subjective view of the company’s analysts was quickly scotched after it became obvious that those views hurt, not helped, the ratings.

Although target prices and ratings may appear to be of merit, they’re running neck and neck with Casper the Friendly Ghost. 

N. Russell Wayne, CFP

Any questions?  Please contact me at nrwayne@soundasset.com

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Sound Advice: January 3, 2025

2025 Market Forecasts: Stupidity Taken To An Extreme   If you know anything about stock market performance, you can only gag at the nonsense “esteemed forecasters” are now putting forth about the prospective path of stocks in the year ahead.   Our cousins in the UK would call this rubbish.   I would not be as kind. Leading the Ship of Fools is the forecast from the Chief Investment Strategist at Oppenheimer who is looking for a year-end 2025 level for the Standard & Poor’s Index of 7,100, a whopping 21% increase from the most recent standing.   Indeed, most of these folks are looking for double-digit gains.   Only two expect stocks to weaken. In the last 30 years, the market has risen by more than 20% only 15 times.   The exceptional span during that time was 1996-1999, which accounted for four of those jumps.   What followed in 2000 through 2002 was the polar opposite: 2000:      -9.1% 2001:     -11.9% ...
Post a Comment
Read more

Sound Advice: March 10, 2021

The ABCs of Stock Picking After decades of analyzing stocks (and funds) and investing for clients, I'm happy to share in plain English what's involved, what works, and what doesn't.  Keep in mind the reality that successful stock picking is an effort to maintain a good batting average. In baseball, a batting average of .300 or better is considered quite good.  With stock picking, you need to do better than .600, which means you have many more winners than losers. No one gets it right all of the time.  It's not even close.  Wall Street shops all have their recommended lists and the financial media regularly hawk 10 stocks to buy now. Following that road usually is a direct route to disaster.  Don't be tempted. Let's begin with the big picture: The stock market goes up and down over time, but the long-term trend is up.  When there's a rally under way, everyone feels like a genius.  When the market hits an air pocket, though, with few exception...
Post a Comment
Read more

Sound Advice: June 17, 2020

Rock and a Hard Place Regardless of your age, impressions from childhood linger.  As the first days of summer approach, we all remember the feeling that accompanied the end of a school year.  Yet as much as many of us would like to believe we again have the summertime freedom to do as we wish, the reality is quite the opposite. Although months of confinement and limitations on social interaction have increased our personal discomfort and severely impacted the business community, our current situation is not analogous to the end of any school year.  It’s quite the opposite. There is every reason to continue wearing face masks, social distancing, and avoiding close contact with others.  Nothing suggests that we can modify our behavior significantly or resume patterns of daily living we enjoyed only a few months ago. There are no meaningful advances in medical treatments.  At best, there are attempts to combine different approaches...
Post a Comment
Read more