Skip to main content

Sound Advice: September 20, 2023

Target Prices? Really?

For some investors, the temptation to build portfolios by selecting stocks with the highest target prices, compared to current prices, is up there with believing in the tooth fairy. Yet Investopedia, one of the more competent websites, states the following:

“When it comes to evaluating stocks, target prices can be even more useful than the ratings of equity analysts. Strictly defined, a target price is an estimate of a stock's future price, based on earnings forecasts and assumed valuation multiples.”

That may be accurate, though neither should be taken seriously.  Let’s consider the merit of each.

Current prices for stocks are the products of the following equation: earnings per share (i.e., company net income divided by the number of common shares outstanding) times the price-earnings multiple, which is a numeric valuation of the earnings per share (EPS).  If EPS are $2.00 and the stock sells for 40, the price-earnings multiple is 20.

Target prices are forward-looking extrapolations.  In other words, projected future EPS times an assumed price-earnings multiple.  If the EPS for Company X may grow to $3.00 in five years and the price-earnings multiple remains at 20, one might conclude that the price will rise to 60.

That’s interesting, but deeply flawed since it’s largely a function of the annual rate of earnings growth.  If the rate slows, the price-earnings multiple may narrow.  If it accelerates, the multiple may expand.  Either way, it’s essential to be aware that stocks (and the overall stock market) rarely sell at what might be considered normal valuations.  So target prices are nothing more than crap shoots.

If target prices are essentially meaningless, buy, hold or sell recommendations are total nonsense.  It’s well known that the majority of recommendations are buys pushed by Wall Street houses looking to move large blocks of stock or to satisfy the gullibility of retail investors. Despite this preposterous proposition, there have never been any studies demonstrating that these recommendations are of any value.

Indeed, during my extended tenure at a prestigious investment advisory company, which published stock ratings based solely on quantitative information, a short-term deviation in the ratings method that included the subjective view of the company’s analysts was quickly scotched after it became obvious that those views hurt, not helped, the ratings.

Although target prices and ratings may appear to be of merit, they’re running neck and neck with Casper the Friendly Ghost. 

N. Russell Wayne, CFP

Any questions?  Please contact me at nrwayne@soundasset.com

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Sound Advice: September 19, 2026

Is AI good news or bad news for investments? AI is potentially very good news for investors—but not automatically good news for every investment . The key distinction is between AI as an economic technology and AI stocks at today's prices . As of September 2026, there are compelling reasons for both optimism and caution: The bullish case: AI spending remains enormous. Gartner estimates global AI spending at $2.7 trillion in 2026 , up 49.5% year over year. If AI produces sustained productivity gains, corporate profits could expand well beyond the companies currently selling AI hardware. The valuation case: Investors have already priced in a lot of success. Valuations of major AI companies are elevated and expected long-term earnings growth is well above historical norms. The spending-risk case: The five largest hyperscalers are expected to spend more than $1 trillion on AI-related capital expendit...
Post a Comment
Read more

Sound Advice: September 30, 2026

Now what? For many women, there comes a time when financial confusion reigns.   It may come after a spouse passes or a marriage goes off the rails.   It’s the same situation for women who never married. The questions are many.   The answers may be few.   Toward the top of the list of concerns is the issue of understanding.   Although there are always complex matters, it’s essential that all of the elements are clearly presented in a straightforward fashion.   There’s more.   Presentation is one thing, but comprehension is another. If there’s a question, it must be asked.   Clarity is the key.   Don’t just say I get it when you don’t.   And, it’s essential to grasp how each of the items fits in the overall situation. In the absence of understanding, no decisions will be made. Here are some of the most pressing questions? What’s the smart way to handle my investments? Where should I go for advice? A bank, stockbroker, attor...
Post a Comment
Read more

Sound Advice: July 16, 2025

Fixed annuities are poor investments Fixed annuities are often criticized as poor investments for several reasons, despite their reputation for providing stable, predictable income.  Here are the key drawbacks and concerns:   High Fees and Commissions Internal Fees:  Fixed annuities can carry a range of fees, including administrative charges, mortality expense risk fees, and rider fees. These can add up to 2%–4% per year, significantly eroding returns over time. Commissions:  Sales agents and financial advisors often receive high commissions for selling annuities—sometimes as much as 5%–8% of the invested amount. This creates a financial incentive for advisers to recommend them, even when they may not be the best fit for the client. Comparison to Other Investments:  Mutual funds and ETFs typically have much lower fees and commissions, making them more cost-effective for long-term growth. Limited Growth a...
Post a Comment
Read more