Skip to main content

Sound Advice: September 13, 2023

What’s a Market Strategist?

Funny you should ask.  In plain English, it’s typically a grossly overpaid, pompous man or woman working at a financial institution who pretends he or she has the extraordinary gift of being able to see the future.  These people periodically give forecasts of where the market is going, provide lengthy lists of reasons for these forecasts, and have the enviable record of continuing to spout utterly ridiculous nonsense.

Market strategists love to embrace data over extended periods (sometimes from the beginning of time), which they would have you believe has a direct impact on the path they see ahead.  In the interest of appearing to cover all the ground in their presentations, they pay homage to the bizarre “field” of technical analysis, the value of which approximates the lowest of negative numbers.  Speculation based on price patterns of stocks is voodoo, nothing more.

Rather than swallowing these periodic regurgitations of rubbish, one would be far better off appreciating the reality that the long-term trend of the market is up, but typically one out of three years, on average, registers weak results or slips.  Yet in spite of this, market strategists always forecast gains.

Over time, stock prices are driven by the underlying results of the companies involved.  But in relatively short spans, the operative force is changing investor psychology.  Also of note is the influence of interest rates.  Rising rates tend to weaken stock prices.  Easing rates tend to strengthen stock prices. 

As we all know, important news of the day, whether economic or geopolitical, can trigger sizable moves in either direction.  None of this is predictable.

Other considerations include seasonality and tendencies during the four years of each presidential term.  It should be noted that stock price gains tend to be greatest during the first and fourth calendar quarters of each year as well as in the third year of presidential terms.

With that said, however, there are always deviations from the norm.  In all cases, it will be helpful to maintain a focus on the longer term, at least three to five years, and disregard interim developments.

Don’t even think of paying any attention to the shamans of Wall Street, whose value is nothing more than imaginary.  I recall a presentation by one of these esteemed gentlemen whose early-2020 comment about Covid was that there was nothing to be concerned about.  Yup!

N. Russell Wayne, CFPÒ

Any questions?  Please contact me at nrwayne@soundasset.com


Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Sound Advice: January 3, 2025

2025 Market Forecasts: Stupidity Taken To An Extreme   If you know anything about stock market performance, you can only gag at the nonsense “esteemed forecasters” are now putting forth about the prospective path of stocks in the year ahead.   Our cousins in the UK would call this rubbish.   I would not be as kind. Leading the Ship of Fools is the forecast from the Chief Investment Strategist at Oppenheimer who is looking for a year-end 2025 level for the Standard & Poor’s Index of 7,100, a whopping 21% increase from the most recent standing.   Indeed, most of these folks are looking for double-digit gains.   Only two expect stocks to weaken. In the last 30 years, the market has risen by more than 20% only 15 times.   The exceptional span during that time was 1996-1999, which accounted for four of those jumps.   What followed in 2000 through 2002 was the polar opposite: 2000:      -9.1% 2001:     -11.9% ...
Post a Comment
Read more

Sound Advice: January 15, 2025

Why investors shouldn't pay attention to Wall Street forecasts   Investors shouldn't pay attention to Wall Street forecasts for several compelling reasons: Poor accuracy Wall Street forecasts have a terrible track record of accuracy. Studies show that their predictions are often no better than random chance, with accuracy rates as low as 47%   Some prominent analysts even perform worse, with accuracy ratings as low as 35% Consistent overestimation Analysts consistently overestimate earnings growth, predicting 10-12%                 annual growth when the reality is closer to 6%.   This overoptimism can                 lead investors to make overly aggressive bets in the market. Inability to predict unpredictable events The stock market is influenced by numerous unpredictable factors, including geopolitical events, technological changes, and company-specific news.   Anal...
Post a Comment
Read more

Sound Advice: July 16, 2025

Fixed annuities are poor investments Fixed annuities are often criticized as poor investments for several reasons, despite their reputation for providing stable, predictable income.  Here are the key drawbacks and concerns:   High Fees and Commissions Internal Fees:  Fixed annuities can carry a range of fees, including administrative charges, mortality expense risk fees, and rider fees. These can add up to 2%–4% per year, significantly eroding returns over time. Commissions:  Sales agents and financial advisors often receive high commissions for selling annuities—sometimes as much as 5%–8% of the invested amount. This creates a financial incentive for advisers to recommend them, even when they may not be the best fit for the client. Comparison to Other Investments:  Mutual funds and ETFs typically have much lower fees and commissions, making them more cost-effective for long-term growth. Limited Growth a...
Post a Comment
Read more