Skip to main content

Sound Advice: May 24, 2023

The Risk of High Dividend Yields

Over the last decade and a half, it’s been a challenge finding generous current returns on investments.  That’s especially true for the fixed-income market (primarily bonds), which most of the time has been a relatively safe haven for those seeking assured returns.  The reality is that recent years have not been a mirror for “most of the time.”

The problem is interest rates.  As interest rates rise, the values of fixed-income investments fall.  Why?  Because interest rates tend to move in relation to rates set by the Federal Reserve Board.  The Fed’s efforts are aimed at stimulating or cooling the economy.

For an extended period, interest rates have been bobbing along the lowest end of the yield spectrum.  At the start, the central bank opted for well above average stimulation to counter the impact of the 2008-9 financial crisis.  For bond investors, that continued the pattern that provided significant capital appreciation as well as interest on their holdings.

But as inflation ballooned over the latest three years, the Fed did a marked about-face, boosting interest rates at an unprecedented pace to bring things under control.  That was bad news for bonds, which lost considerable principal value.

That may change as the economy and inflation weaken.  In the interim, those seeking substantial yields have turned their attention to high dividend yielding stocks, often via exchange-traded funds.  On the surface, that seems to be a comfortable approach.  But there are risks.

Consistent and reasonably assured high dividend yields are often available from mature, industry-leading companies that are largely insulated from major economic shifts.  But there are others where the surrounding moat is shallow. 

One group consists of companies in cyclical industries, which follow boom-and-bust cycles.  Another group would be companies that have not kept up with changing technology, placing them in the awkward position of having increasing difficulty maintaining dividend payouts to shareholders. 

These companies are identified by viewing what’s known as the dividend payout ratio.  That’s dividends paid as a percentage of the company’s net income.  It’s a check on whether there’s enough money to make regular quarterly payments.

In rare cases, there may be lean periods when more is going out than coming in, but typically it’s a process that just gets worse.  When this happens, dividend rates get cut and then they are eliminated.

It doesn’t stop there.  When dividends are gone, asset managers holding dividend stocks have to sell their holdings, which may lead to a further loss in value.

 

N. Russell Wayne, CFPÒ

Any questions?  Please contact me at nrwayne@soundasset.com

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Sound Advice: July 16, 2025

Fixed annuities are poor investments Fixed annuities are often criticized as poor investments for several reasons, despite their reputation for providing stable, predictable income.  Here are the key drawbacks and concerns:   High Fees and Commissions Internal Fees:  Fixed annuities can carry a range of fees, including administrative charges, mortality expense risk fees, and rider fees. These can add up to 2%–4% per year, significantly eroding returns over time. Commissions:  Sales agents and financial advisors often receive high commissions for selling annuities—sometimes as much as 5%–8% of the invested amount. This creates a financial incentive for advisers to recommend them, even when they may not be the best fit for the client. Comparison to Other Investments:  Mutual funds and ETFs typically have much lower fees and commissions, making them more cost-effective for long-term growth. Limited Growth a...
Post a Comment
Read more

Sound Advice: October 8, 2025

How many investors have outperformed the stock market over the last 20 years? Very few investors have outperformed the stock market over the past 20 years.   Data shows that only about 6% to 8% of actively managed equity funds in the U.S. beat the market over this period, with the vast majority—over 90%—underperforming the S&P 500 or equivalent broad indexes. Percentage of Investors Beating the Market Only 8% of equity funds investing in large companies managed to outperform the market over a recent 20-year span. About 94% of all domestic funds underperformed the S&P 1500 Composite Index from 2005-2024. Over shorter timeframes (5-10 years), typically fewer than 15-20% of fund managers beat the S&P 500, and performance persistence is rare. Why It Is Rare The S&P 500’s high returns have proven immensely difficult to beat, especially as indexing has become popular and markets have ...
Post a Comment
Read more

Sound Advice: January 15, 2025

Why investors shouldn't pay attention to Wall Street forecasts   Investors shouldn't pay attention to Wall Street forecasts for several compelling reasons: Poor accuracy Wall Street forecasts have a terrible track record of accuracy. Studies show that their predictions are often no better than random chance, with accuracy rates as low as 47%   Some prominent analysts even perform worse, with accuracy ratings as low as 35% Consistent overestimation Analysts consistently overestimate earnings growth, predicting 10-12%                 annual growth when the reality is closer to 6%.   This overoptimism can                 lead investors to make overly aggressive bets in the market. Inability to predict unpredictable events The stock market is influenced by numerous unpredictable factors, including geopolitical events, technological changes, and company-specific news.   Anal...
Post a Comment
Read more