Skip to main content

Sound Advice: May 24, 2023

The Risk of High Dividend Yields

Over the last decade and a half, it’s been a challenge finding generous current returns on investments.  That’s especially true for the fixed-income market (primarily bonds), which most of the time has been a relatively safe haven for those seeking assured returns.  The reality is that recent years have not been a mirror for “most of the time.”

The problem is interest rates.  As interest rates rise, the values of fixed-income investments fall.  Why?  Because interest rates tend to move in relation to rates set by the Federal Reserve Board.  The Fed’s efforts are aimed at stimulating or cooling the economy.

For an extended period, interest rates have been bobbing along the lowest end of the yield spectrum.  At the start, the central bank opted for well above average stimulation to counter the impact of the 2008-9 financial crisis.  For bond investors, that continued the pattern that provided significant capital appreciation as well as interest on their holdings.

But as inflation ballooned over the latest three years, the Fed did a marked about-face, boosting interest rates at an unprecedented pace to bring things under control.  That was bad news for bonds, which lost considerable principal value.

That may change as the economy and inflation weaken.  In the interim, those seeking substantial yields have turned their attention to high dividend yielding stocks, often via exchange-traded funds.  On the surface, that seems to be a comfortable approach.  But there are risks.

Consistent and reasonably assured high dividend yields are often available from mature, industry-leading companies that are largely insulated from major economic shifts.  But there are others where the surrounding moat is shallow. 

One group consists of companies in cyclical industries, which follow boom-and-bust cycles.  Another group would be companies that have not kept up with changing technology, placing them in the awkward position of having increasing difficulty maintaining dividend payouts to shareholders. 

These companies are identified by viewing what’s known as the dividend payout ratio.  That’s dividends paid as a percentage of the company’s net income.  It’s a check on whether there’s enough money to make regular quarterly payments.

In rare cases, there may be lean periods when more is going out than coming in, but typically it’s a process that just gets worse.  When this happens, dividend rates get cut and then they are eliminated.

It doesn’t stop there.  When dividends are gone, asset managers holding dividend stocks have to sell their holdings, which may lead to a further loss in value.

 

N. Russell Wayne, CFPÒ

Any questions?  Please contact me at nrwayne@soundasset.com

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Sound Advice: January 3, 2025

2025 Market Forecasts: Stupidity Taken To An Extreme   If you know anything about stock market performance, you can only gag at the nonsense “esteemed forecasters” are now putting forth about the prospective path of stocks in the year ahead.   Our cousins in the UK would call this rubbish.   I would not be as kind. Leading the Ship of Fools is the forecast from the Chief Investment Strategist at Oppenheimer who is looking for a year-end 2025 level for the Standard & Poor’s Index of 7,100, a whopping 21% increase from the most recent standing.   Indeed, most of these folks are looking for double-digit gains.   Only two expect stocks to weaken. In the last 30 years, the market has risen by more than 20% only 15 times.   The exceptional span during that time was 1996-1999, which accounted for four of those jumps.   What followed in 2000 through 2002 was the polar opposite: 2000:      -9.1% 2001:     -11.9% ...
Post a Comment
Read more

Sound Advice: January 15, 2025

Why investors shouldn't pay attention to Wall Street forecasts   Investors shouldn't pay attention to Wall Street forecasts for several compelling reasons: Poor accuracy Wall Street forecasts have a terrible track record of accuracy. Studies show that their predictions are often no better than random chance, with accuracy rates as low as 47%   Some prominent analysts even perform worse, with accuracy ratings as low as 35% Consistent overestimation Analysts consistently overestimate earnings growth, predicting 10-12%                 annual growth when the reality is closer to 6%.   This overoptimism can                 lead investors to make overly aggressive bets in the market. Inability to predict unpredictable events The stock market is influenced by numerous unpredictable factors, including geopolitical events, technological changes, and company-specific news.   Anal...
Post a Comment
Read more

Sound Advice: October 12, 2022

More Pain Ahead? It’s been a difficult year for the investment markets, but tough times have happened before and they will certainly happen again.   Sometimes recoveries are relatively quick and sometimes a hefty dose of patience is required.   No two downdrafts are alike, but the net result is always a rebound to even higher levels than seen before. One of the most uncomfortable stretches over the last half century took place during the oil embargo days of the early and mid-1970s.   Market valuations fell to the high single digits, a level that was about half the historic average.   For investors, this was one of the great sales of all time.   Those who had the courage to get aboard reaped huge rewards. More recent pullbacks of note took place during the dot.com days of the turn of the millennium and the banking crisis of 2008-9.   The former period was marked by what appeared to be investors’ absolute indifference to longstanding measures of reasona...
Post a Comment
Read more