Skip to main content

Sound Advice: April 5, 2023

The Anatomy of a Financial Plan

However essential it is to have a proper plan for one’s financial future, the truth is that most people don’t.  In many cases, they start giving serious thought to what lies ahead as they move into their 50s and 60s, yet by that time it may be too late to make needed adjustments to ensure the ability to continue in their hoped-for lifestyle.

The basic elements of planning are simple: what you own, what you owe, what you are earning, and what you are spending.  Very straightforward.  Three of the four are relatively easy to pinpoint.  The tricky part is getting a handle on expenses.  Not only is it essential to zero in on current expenses, but spending needs to be viewed in three other contexts: retirement, one survivor, and that survivor in retirement.  Viewed from these different angles, the numbers change substantially.

The current expense budget will probably include a couple of dozen categories, from essential (mortgage, utilities, etc.) to discretionary (furnishings, clothing, vacations, etc.)  It may be helpful to average monthly costs over the latest six to 12 months to help focus on each of these.

Retirement and survivorship will have a marked impact.  Many items will be lower; a few will be higher.

Then there’s the matter of Social Security benefits, which are available as early as age 62, but far better to wait at least until Full Retirement Age (FRA) (now about 67) or even better until 70, when the maximum level will be available.  Also, for folks who are considering starting before FRA, there will be tax liability if you continue to work.  After FRA, you can make as much as you want without any reduction in benefits.

In addition to what might be considered regular income and expenses, there may be nonrecurring items, such as inheritances and downsizing.  A much bigger deal will be health issues.  Two-thirds of people over 65 will be faced with the likelihood of needing some kind of long-term care.  If that includes a transfer to a good-quality assisted care facility, the annual cost could easily be in the area of $150,000 or more per year.  Recent statistics suggest that, depending on one’s status, that care will be needed for two to four years, on average.

If one’s resources are sufficient, the cost may be self-funded.  If not and a long-term care insurance policy is bought soon enough, that may be adequate preparation.  But fewer companies are writing this coverage and it has gotten more costly.

The bottom line is where things will stand as one moves along through retirement.  When the numbers fall short, the options will include working longer, spending less, saving more, and getting better returns on one’s investments.

When the process is begun early enough, there will be sufficient time to do what’s needed to keep one’s ship afloat.  Waiting too long, however, may lead to a problem that cannot be fixed.   

N. Russell Wayne, CFPÒ

Any questions?  Please contact me at nrwayne@soundasset.com

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Sound Advice: January 3, 2025

2025 Market Forecasts: Stupidity Taken To An Extreme   If you know anything about stock market performance, you can only gag at the nonsense “esteemed forecasters” are now putting forth about the prospective path of stocks in the year ahead.   Our cousins in the UK would call this rubbish.   I would not be as kind. Leading the Ship of Fools is the forecast from the Chief Investment Strategist at Oppenheimer who is looking for a year-end 2025 level for the Standard & Poor’s Index of 7,100, a whopping 21% increase from the most recent standing.   Indeed, most of these folks are looking for double-digit gains.   Only two expect stocks to weaken. In the last 30 years, the market has risen by more than 20% only 15 times.   The exceptional span during that time was 1996-1999, which accounted for four of those jumps.   What followed in 2000 through 2002 was the polar opposite: 2000:      -9.1% 2001:     -11.9% ...

Sound Advice: January 15, 2025

Why investors shouldn't pay attention to Wall Street forecasts   Investors shouldn't pay attention to Wall Street forecasts for several compelling reasons: Poor accuracy Wall Street forecasts have a terrible track record of accuracy. Studies show that their predictions are often no better than random chance, with accuracy rates as low as 47%   Some prominent analysts even perform worse, with accuracy ratings as low as 35% Consistent overestimation Analysts consistently overestimate earnings growth, predicting 10-12%                 annual growth when the reality is closer to 6%.   This overoptimism can                 lead investors to make overly aggressive bets in the market. Inability to predict unpredictable events The stock market is influenced by numerous unpredictable factors, including geopolitical events, technological changes, and company-specific news.   Anal...

Sound Advice: October 12, 2022

More Pain Ahead? It’s been a difficult year for the investment markets, but tough times have happened before and they will certainly happen again.   Sometimes recoveries are relatively quick and sometimes a hefty dose of patience is required.   No two downdrafts are alike, but the net result is always a rebound to even higher levels than seen before. One of the most uncomfortable stretches over the last half century took place during the oil embargo days of the early and mid-1970s.   Market valuations fell to the high single digits, a level that was about half the historic average.   For investors, this was one of the great sales of all time.   Those who had the courage to get aboard reaped huge rewards. More recent pullbacks of note took place during the dot.com days of the turn of the millennium and the banking crisis of 2008-9.   The former period was marked by what appeared to be investors’ absolute indifference to longstanding measures of reasona...