Skip to main content

Sound Advice: April 19, 2023

More Advisor Alphabet Soup

One can only be amazed at the creativity of those who would be too happy to sell advisors even more letters to follow their names.  Those who are naïve probably figure that the more letters there are, the stronger the credentials of the advisor.  My sympathies to those who actually believe that.  Indeed, an easy rule of thumb to follow is that once the string gets past two sets of letters it’s probably an indication of someone to be avoided.  Yet, there are always those who will be happy to sell you a small part of the alphabet for a fee.

Just recently, I received an email from the International Association of Registered Financial Consultants (IARFC), which claims to support “. . . the financial professional with a distinct Mission (capital M), a strong ethical code, and a recognition of your experience, education, and licensing through designations and an accredited credential.”  Wow, what a mouthful.

For fees ranging between $200 and $600 (plus annual renewals), the IARFC offers several membership levels.  No experience, no problem.  Just send in $200.  Less than three years’ experience, that’ll cost you $250, which gets you the letters RFA: Registered Financial Associate.  I have no idea where the person will be registered.  One thing’s for sure, this is not to be confused with Registered Investment Advisor, which requires filing with state or federal regulators.

At the top of this heap is Master Registered Financial Consultant, which requires experience of four years or more, not exactly a heck of a lot of time.  Even so, you can bet that there are ostensible financial advisors who buy in to this nonsense and most assuredly some consumers who still believe in the man behind the green curtain.

There are loads of others to be avoided.  Some are certifications specifically for selling particular types of financial products.  Others target religious groups and seniors. And then there are certifications that use letters to mirror high-quality credentials.  For example, don’t confuse CFPN (Christian Financial Professionals Network) with CFP, the legitimate certification for Certified Financial Planners.

As you might suspect, efforts by the wrongdoers get even worse.  Just remember that CFP (Certified Financial Planner), CFA (Chartered Financial Analyst), CPA (Certified Public Accountant), and CIMA (Certified Investment Management Analyst) are those that are legitimate and meaningful.

For any of the others, it’s odds on that they’re garbage.

N. Russell Wayne, CFPÒ

Any questions?  Please contact me at nrwayne@soundasset.com


Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Sound Advice: July 16, 2025

Fixed annuities are poor investments Fixed annuities are often criticized as poor investments for several reasons, despite their reputation for providing stable, predictable income.  Here are the key drawbacks and concerns:   High Fees and Commissions Internal Fees:  Fixed annuities can carry a range of fees, including administrative charges, mortality expense risk fees, and rider fees. These can add up to 2%–4% per year, significantly eroding returns over time. Commissions:  Sales agents and financial advisors often receive high commissions for selling annuities—sometimes as much as 5%–8% of the invested amount. This creates a financial incentive for advisers to recommend them, even when they may not be the best fit for the client. Comparison to Other Investments:  Mutual funds and ETFs typically have much lower fees and commissions, making them more cost-effective for long-term growth. Limited Growth a...
Post a Comment
Read more

Sound Advice: October 8, 2025

How many investors have outperformed the stock market over the last 20 years? Very few investors have outperformed the stock market over the past 20 years.   Data shows that only about 6% to 8% of actively managed equity funds in the U.S. beat the market over this period, with the vast majority—over 90%—underperforming the S&P 500 or equivalent broad indexes. Percentage of Investors Beating the Market Only 8% of equity funds investing in large companies managed to outperform the market over a recent 20-year span. About 94% of all domestic funds underperformed the S&P 1500 Composite Index from 2005-2024. Over shorter timeframes (5-10 years), typically fewer than 15-20% of fund managers beat the S&P 500, and performance persistence is rare. Why It Is Rare The S&P 500’s high returns have proven immensely difficult to beat, especially as indexing has become popular and markets have ...
Post a Comment
Read more

Sound Advice: January 15, 2025

Why investors shouldn't pay attention to Wall Street forecasts   Investors shouldn't pay attention to Wall Street forecasts for several compelling reasons: Poor accuracy Wall Street forecasts have a terrible track record of accuracy. Studies show that their predictions are often no better than random chance, with accuracy rates as low as 47%   Some prominent analysts even perform worse, with accuracy ratings as low as 35% Consistent overestimation Analysts consistently overestimate earnings growth, predicting 10-12%                 annual growth when the reality is closer to 6%.   This overoptimism can                 lead investors to make overly aggressive bets in the market. Inability to predict unpredictable events The stock market is influenced by numerous unpredictable factors, including geopolitical events, technological changes, and company-specific news.   Anal...
Post a Comment
Read more