Skip to main content

Sound Advice: March 8, 2023

Turnarounds Rarely Turn Around

Although the majority of stocks that will prove to be profitable long-term holdings will gain ground on the basis of consistent improvement in their underlying profitability, there are always a few that are billed as promising turnaround situations.  Turnaround, in this context, typically refers to companies that may be undergoing major changes.  For some, the change may be a potentially lucrative new line of products.  For others, it may be a refocusing of efforts on an underserved market.  Or perhaps, a new management team boasting a successful record of breathing new life into firms that had been going nowhere fast.

New ideas are indeed the fuel of future growth, but more often than not the enthusiasm for whatever innovations have come to light is of greater magnitude than what probably lies ahead.  In plain English, the biggest part of these deals is the hype surrounding them, which in most cases is not justified. 

The few that eventually work out tend to be the result of a new team coming in to tidy up a messy house, sharpen the focus on products or services that are viable, and flank them with interesting variations to breathe new life into the ongoing stream of revenues.  Sometimes, these are the subjects of buyouts in which company fat is ruthlessly stripped away.  Or management passes the baton to more creative individuals who can properly assess existing strengths and develop add-ons to help pick up the company’s momentum.

The stories of these companies are often interesting, but the longstanding results of investments based on new incarnations that are worthy of substantial commitments are not good.  The rare exceptions appear when ostensible superstar managers come aboard ho-hum companies and rearrange the existing elements to maximize the value of the operation. 

One stellar example of a great turnaround was Apple, which in most of its early years had a checkered record.  The company’s early computers, the Apple II, Lisa, and Macintosh, were quite innovative, but not exactly setting its target audience on fire.  In those days, Steve Jobs was steering the ship, but in 1985 he was forced out by John Sculley and Apple’s board of directors.  For the next dozen years, Apple muddled along and made numerous mistakes.  Fast forward to 1997, Steve Jobs came back with a vengeance, focused totally on getting the company back on track.  What followed was one of the greatest turnarounds in history.

Apple was an outstanding exception, anything but typical.    

 

N. Russell Wayne, CFPÒ

Any questions?  Please contact me at nrwayne@soundasset.com

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Sound Advice: July 16, 2025

Fixed annuities are poor investments Fixed annuities are often criticized as poor investments for several reasons, despite their reputation for providing stable, predictable income.  Here are the key drawbacks and concerns:   High Fees and Commissions Internal Fees:  Fixed annuities can carry a range of fees, including administrative charges, mortality expense risk fees, and rider fees. These can add up to 2%–4% per year, significantly eroding returns over time. Commissions:  Sales agents and financial advisors often receive high commissions for selling annuities—sometimes as much as 5%–8% of the invested amount. This creates a financial incentive for advisers to recommend them, even when they may not be the best fit for the client. Comparison to Other Investments:  Mutual funds and ETFs typically have much lower fees and commissions, making them more cost-effective for long-term growth. Limited Growth a...
Post a Comment
Read more

Sound Advice: October 8, 2025

How many investors have outperformed the stock market over the last 20 years? Very few investors have outperformed the stock market over the past 20 years.   Data shows that only about 6% to 8% of actively managed equity funds in the U.S. beat the market over this period, with the vast majority—over 90%—underperforming the S&P 500 or equivalent broad indexes. Percentage of Investors Beating the Market Only 8% of equity funds investing in large companies managed to outperform the market over a recent 20-year span. About 94% of all domestic funds underperformed the S&P 1500 Composite Index from 2005-2024. Over shorter timeframes (5-10 years), typically fewer than 15-20% of fund managers beat the S&P 500, and performance persistence is rare. Why It Is Rare The S&P 500’s high returns have proven immensely difficult to beat, especially as indexing has become popular and markets have ...
Post a Comment
Read more

Sound Advice: January 15, 2025

Why investors shouldn't pay attention to Wall Street forecasts   Investors shouldn't pay attention to Wall Street forecasts for several compelling reasons: Poor accuracy Wall Street forecasts have a terrible track record of accuracy. Studies show that their predictions are often no better than random chance, with accuracy rates as low as 47%   Some prominent analysts even perform worse, with accuracy ratings as low as 35% Consistent overestimation Analysts consistently overestimate earnings growth, predicting 10-12%                 annual growth when the reality is closer to 6%.   This overoptimism can                 lead investors to make overly aggressive bets in the market. Inability to predict unpredictable events The stock market is influenced by numerous unpredictable factors, including geopolitical events, technological changes, and company-specific news.   Anal...
Post a Comment
Read more