Skip to main content

Sound Advice: March 8, 2023

Turnarounds Rarely Turn Around

Although the majority of stocks that will prove to be profitable long-term holdings will gain ground on the basis of consistent improvement in their underlying profitability, there are always a few that are billed as promising turnaround situations.  Turnaround, in this context, typically refers to companies that may be undergoing major changes.  For some, the change may be a potentially lucrative new line of products.  For others, it may be a refocusing of efforts on an underserved market.  Or perhaps, a new management team boasting a successful record of breathing new life into firms that had been going nowhere fast.

New ideas are indeed the fuel of future growth, but more often than not the enthusiasm for whatever innovations have come to light is of greater magnitude than what probably lies ahead.  In plain English, the biggest part of these deals is the hype surrounding them, which in most cases is not justified. 

The few that eventually work out tend to be the result of a new team coming in to tidy up a messy house, sharpen the focus on products or services that are viable, and flank them with interesting variations to breathe new life into the ongoing stream of revenues.  Sometimes, these are the subjects of buyouts in which company fat is ruthlessly stripped away.  Or management passes the baton to more creative individuals who can properly assess existing strengths and develop add-ons to help pick up the company’s momentum.

The stories of these companies are often interesting, but the longstanding results of investments based on new incarnations that are worthy of substantial commitments are not good.  The rare exceptions appear when ostensible superstar managers come aboard ho-hum companies and rearrange the existing elements to maximize the value of the operation. 

One stellar example of a great turnaround was Apple, which in most of its early years had a checkered record.  The company’s early computers, the Apple II, Lisa, and Macintosh, were quite innovative, but not exactly setting its target audience on fire.  In those days, Steve Jobs was steering the ship, but in 1985 he was forced out by John Sculley and Apple’s board of directors.  For the next dozen years, Apple muddled along and made numerous mistakes.  Fast forward to 1997, Steve Jobs came back with a vengeance, focused totally on getting the company back on track.  What followed was one of the greatest turnarounds in history.

Apple was an outstanding exception, anything but typical.    

 

N. Russell Wayne, CFPÒ

Any questions?  Please contact me at nrwayne@soundasset.com

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Sound Advice: September 30, 2026

Now what? For many women, there comes a time when financial confusion reigns.   It may come after a spouse passes or a marriage goes off the rails.   It’s the same situation for women who never married. The questions are many.   The answers may be few.   Toward the top of the list of concerns is the issue of understanding.   Although there are always complex matters, it’s essential that all of the elements are clearly presented in a straightforward fashion.   There’s more.   Presentation is one thing, but comprehension is another. If there’s a question, it must be asked.   Clarity is the key.   Don’t just say I get it when you don’t.   And, it’s essential to grasp how each of the items fits in the overall situation. In the absence of understanding, no decisions will be made. Here are some of the most pressing questions? What’s the smart way to handle my investments? Where should I go for advice? A bank, stockbroker, attor...
Post a Comment
Read more

Sound Advice: September 19, 2026

Is AI good news or bad news for investments? AI is potentially very good news for investors—but not automatically good news for every investment . The key distinction is between AI as an economic technology and AI stocks at today's prices . As of September 2026, there are compelling reasons for both optimism and caution: The bullish case: AI spending remains enormous. Gartner estimates global AI spending at $2.7 trillion in 2026 , up 49.5% year over year. If AI produces sustained productivity gains, corporate profits could expand well beyond the companies currently selling AI hardware. The valuation case: Investors have already priced in a lot of success. Valuations of major AI companies are elevated and expected long-term earnings growth is well above historical norms. The spending-risk case: The five largest hyperscalers are expected to spend more than $1 trillion on AI-related capital expendit...
Post a Comment
Read more

Sound Advice: October 14, 2026

Why your adviser must be a fiduciary   You should insist that your financial adviser be a fiduciary because a fiduciary is legally obligated, when acting in a fiduciary capacity, to put your interests ahead of their own and manage conflicts of interest appropriately. Key reasons: Your interests come first. A fiduciary duty requires the adviser to act in your best interest rather than simply recommending something that is suitable or profitable for them. Fewer conflicts of interest. Some advisers can receive commissions, bonuses, or other compensation for recommending particular investments or insurance products. A fiduciary must address material conflicts rather than allowing them to drive the recommendation. Greater transparency. Fiduciary advisers generally have obligations concerning disclosure, fees, conflicts, and how they are compensated. That makes it easier for you to understand what you're actually paying. Better alignment over the long term. A good adviser sh...
Post a Comment
Read more