Skip to main content

Sound Advice: March 8, 2023

Turnarounds Rarely Turn Around

Although the majority of stocks that will prove to be profitable long-term holdings will gain ground on the basis of consistent improvement in their underlying profitability, there are always a few that are billed as promising turnaround situations.  Turnaround, in this context, typically refers to companies that may be undergoing major changes.  For some, the change may be a potentially lucrative new line of products.  For others, it may be a refocusing of efforts on an underserved market.  Or perhaps, a new management team boasting a successful record of breathing new life into firms that had been going nowhere fast.

New ideas are indeed the fuel of future growth, but more often than not the enthusiasm for whatever innovations have come to light is of greater magnitude than what probably lies ahead.  In plain English, the biggest part of these deals is the hype surrounding them, which in most cases is not justified. 

The few that eventually work out tend to be the result of a new team coming in to tidy up a messy house, sharpen the focus on products or services that are viable, and flank them with interesting variations to breathe new life into the ongoing stream of revenues.  Sometimes, these are the subjects of buyouts in which company fat is ruthlessly stripped away.  Or management passes the baton to more creative individuals who can properly assess existing strengths and develop add-ons to help pick up the company’s momentum.

The stories of these companies are often interesting, but the longstanding results of investments based on new incarnations that are worthy of substantial commitments are not good.  The rare exceptions appear when ostensible superstar managers come aboard ho-hum companies and rearrange the existing elements to maximize the value of the operation. 

One stellar example of a great turnaround was Apple, which in most of its early years had a checkered record.  The company’s early computers, the Apple II, Lisa, and Macintosh, were quite innovative, but not exactly setting its target audience on fire.  In those days, Steve Jobs was steering the ship, but in 1985 he was forced out by John Sculley and Apple’s board of directors.  For the next dozen years, Apple muddled along and made numerous mistakes.  Fast forward to 1997, Steve Jobs came back with a vengeance, focused totally on getting the company back on track.  What followed was one of the greatest turnarounds in history.

Apple was an outstanding exception, anything but typical.    

 

N. Russell Wayne, CFPÒ

Any questions?  Please contact me at nrwayne@soundasset.com

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Sound Advice: January 3, 2025

2025 Market Forecasts: Stupidity Taken To An Extreme   If you know anything about stock market performance, you can only gag at the nonsense “esteemed forecasters” are now putting forth about the prospective path of stocks in the year ahead.   Our cousins in the UK would call this rubbish.   I would not be as kind. Leading the Ship of Fools is the forecast from the Chief Investment Strategist at Oppenheimer who is looking for a year-end 2025 level for the Standard & Poor’s Index of 7,100, a whopping 21% increase from the most recent standing.   Indeed, most of these folks are looking for double-digit gains.   Only two expect stocks to weaken. In the last 30 years, the market has risen by more than 20% only 15 times.   The exceptional span during that time was 1996-1999, which accounted for four of those jumps.   What followed in 2000 through 2002 was the polar opposite: 2000:      -9.1% 2001:     -11.9% ...
Post a Comment
Read more

Sound Advice: January 15, 2025

Why investors shouldn't pay attention to Wall Street forecasts   Investors shouldn't pay attention to Wall Street forecasts for several compelling reasons: Poor accuracy Wall Street forecasts have a terrible track record of accuracy. Studies show that their predictions are often no better than random chance, with accuracy rates as low as 47%   Some prominent analysts even perform worse, with accuracy ratings as low as 35% Consistent overestimation Analysts consistently overestimate earnings growth, predicting 10-12%                 annual growth when the reality is closer to 6%.   This overoptimism can                 lead investors to make overly aggressive bets in the market. Inability to predict unpredictable events The stock market is influenced by numerous unpredictable factors, including geopolitical events, technological changes, and company-specific news.   Anal...
Post a Comment
Read more

Sound Advice: October 12, 2022

More Pain Ahead? It’s been a difficult year for the investment markets, but tough times have happened before and they will certainly happen again.   Sometimes recoveries are relatively quick and sometimes a hefty dose of patience is required.   No two downdrafts are alike, but the net result is always a rebound to even higher levels than seen before. One of the most uncomfortable stretches over the last half century took place during the oil embargo days of the early and mid-1970s.   Market valuations fell to the high single digits, a level that was about half the historic average.   For investors, this was one of the great sales of all time.   Those who had the courage to get aboard reaped huge rewards. More recent pullbacks of note took place during the dot.com days of the turn of the millennium and the banking crisis of 2008-9.   The former period was marked by what appeared to be investors’ absolute indifference to longstanding measures of reasona...
Post a Comment
Read more