Skip to main content

Sound Advice: February 8, 2023

Buys, Holds, and Sells

One of the fascinating things about the world of investing is the proliferation of stock recommendations.  Most come from brokerage firms, but more than a few come from the print and broadcast media.  Rarely does a day go by without seeing “10 Stocks To Buy Now” or “Five Funds To Hold Forever.”  My sympathies to those who take this stuff seriously.

In the good old days when stock commissions were hefty, as in $150 or more per ticket, big pay days were earned by institutional stock analysts who generated massive tomes of commentary and data about companies they considered outstanding investments.  That was prior to May 1, 1975, when the Securities & Exchange Commission ruled that brokerage firms had to negotiate commissions.  Before then, those reports often ran to dozens of pages in support of the thesis.  In most cases, their best use was as kindling in a fireplace.

Most of the recommendations were Buys and there were usually a few Holds from analysts who could not make up their minds about which way to go.  In rare cases, analysts prepared reports with the heading Sell.

The problem is the reality that both a Buy and a Sell are needed to complete a transaction.  That, in turn, requires a discipline underlying the decision to buy and a discipline underlying the decision to sell.

What’s wrong with this picture.  Everything.  Yet the bombardment of nonsense continues.

This embarrassing situation gets even worse when firms put forth Conviction Lists and when websites assign numerical values that are intended to underscore the likelihood of success for each of the issues that have been rated.  However these recommendations are presented, only those who are extraordinarily naïve would base their portfolio construction on this information.

During my years at Value Line, the well-known financial publication, our written recommendations always had to be consistent with the firm’s Timeliness Ranking system.  Indeed, the theoretical results of the system showed a distinct differentiation between the market performances of the stocks that were covered.  From 1 (Highest) to 5 (Lowest), the price changes over time seemed to validate the system’s output.  But to my knowledge, that theoretical approach was never successful in practical application.

It’s all . . . hogwash.

N. Russell Wayne, CFPÒ

www.soundasset.com

 

Any questions?  Please contact me at nrwayne@soundasset.com

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Sound Advice: September 19, 2026

Is AI good news or bad news for investments? AI is potentially very good news for investors—but not automatically good news for every investment . The key distinction is between AI as an economic technology and AI stocks at today's prices . As of September 2026, there are compelling reasons for both optimism and caution: The bullish case: AI spending remains enormous. Gartner estimates global AI spending at $2.7 trillion in 2026 , up 49.5% year over year. If AI produces sustained productivity gains, corporate profits could expand well beyond the companies currently selling AI hardware. The valuation case: Investors have already priced in a lot of success. Valuations of major AI companies are elevated and expected long-term earnings growth is well above historical norms. The spending-risk case: The five largest hyperscalers are expected to spend more than $1 trillion on AI-related capital expendit...
Post a Comment
Read more

Sound Advice: September 30, 2026

Now what? For many women, there comes a time when financial confusion reigns.   It may come after a spouse passes or a marriage goes off the rails.   It’s the same situation for women who never married. The questions are many.   The answers may be few.   Toward the top of the list of concerns is the issue of understanding.   Although there are always complex matters, it’s essential that all of the elements are clearly presented in a straightforward fashion.   There’s more.   Presentation is one thing, but comprehension is another. If there’s a question, it must be asked.   Clarity is the key.   Don’t just say I get it when you don’t.   And, it’s essential to grasp how each of the items fits in the overall situation. In the absence of understanding, no decisions will be made. Here are some of the most pressing questions? What’s the smart way to handle my investments? Where should I go for advice? A bank, stockbroker, attor...
Post a Comment
Read more

Sound Advice: July 16, 2025

Fixed annuities are poor investments Fixed annuities are often criticized as poor investments for several reasons, despite their reputation for providing stable, predictable income.  Here are the key drawbacks and concerns:   High Fees and Commissions Internal Fees:  Fixed annuities can carry a range of fees, including administrative charges, mortality expense risk fees, and rider fees. These can add up to 2%–4% per year, significantly eroding returns over time. Commissions:  Sales agents and financial advisors often receive high commissions for selling annuities—sometimes as much as 5%–8% of the invested amount. This creates a financial incentive for advisers to recommend them, even when they may not be the best fit for the client. Comparison to Other Investments:  Mutual funds and ETFs typically have much lower fees and commissions, making them more cost-effective for long-term growth. Limited Growth a...
Post a Comment
Read more