Skip to main content

Sound Advice: February 22, 2023

Always Look at Underlying Fund Holdings

It seems easy enough to look at the name of a mutual fund or exchange-traded fund and assume what kinds of stocks are held by the fund.  But in more than a few cases, that assumption could prove costly.  A common example of this would be mutual funds that are labeled “aggressive”.  That’s a label that one would think suggests the likelihood of above average potential for gains.  More likely, however, it means the fund holds stocks that are highly volatile.  In weak markets, they will probably fall farther; in strong markets, they might rise faster.  But the greater likelihood is that the label is a marketing gimmick for underlying holdings that are relatively benign.

There is another wrinkle of greater concern.  That’s the tendency of some investors to buy a number of large, well-known funds to provide what they believe will be diversification.  At first glance, that would seem to make sense.  The problem, however, is that as fund assets grow, the universe of widely traded stocks narrows.  Why? Because funds running billions of dollars have to focus on stocks with good liquidity, i.e., hundreds of thousands of shares daily.  So as their asset bases get bigger, they end up buying many similar stocks.  The net result is that the investor who buys a bunch ends up holding funds with numerous duplications.  And the hoped-for diversification is not achieved.

A third concern is the prevalence of lopsided holdings.  QQQ, for example, which is the Invesco QQQ Trust, has almost 30% of its assets in Apple, Microsoft, and Amazon.  SPY, the SPDR S&P 500 ETF, has more than 20% concentrated in Apple, Microsoft, Amazon, Meta (Facebook), and Alphabet. Then there’s IHF, iShares U.S. Healthcare Providers ETF, which has 37% of its assets in United HealthCare, CVS, and Anthem.  And, no surprise, there are others of this ilk.

The hitch here is that instead of getting diversification, you end up with heavily biased funds that bring with them the considerably increased risk that you tried to avoid by not buying individual stocks.

One approach to sidestep this problem would be to consider ETFs with equal-weighted underlying holdings.  For the S&P 500, an alternative would be RSP, Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight ETF.  For technology, one could consider RYT, Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight Technology ETF. The underlying holdings of both of these do indeed offer broad and evenly distributed access to the stock segments they represent.

 

N. Russell Wayne, CFPÒ

203-895-8877

Any questions?  Please contact me at nrwayne@soundasset.com 

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Sound Advice: February 21, 2024

800-000-0000 That’s 800-000-0000 Again, 800-000-0000 That’s the typical closing for the hard sell commercials that are increasingly polluting media airwaves.   These are the commercials for products or services you rarely need or most definitely should avoid. A substantial number are on behalf of groups of attorneys who would have you believe that you and many others may be entitled to cash compensation for having used or being exposed to some evil item or substance some time in the last few decades.   The pitch always includes a comment that there’s no cost to you unless there is a settlement in your favor. Much of this is rubbish, but when the appeal suggests that there’s nothing to lose, why not take a shot.   And, as you would expect, “advisors” are standing by 24/7 to take your call and help get the process in motion.   What kind of advisor would be available at 3 a.m.? One version of this approach pops up every year between October 15 th and Decemb...
Post a Comment
Read more

Sound Advice: September 21, 2022

The Professional Approach To Stock Selection There are various approaches to stock selection, but the two that predominate are fundamental analysis and technical analysis.  Fundamental analysis is a numbers-based method that evaluates key factors such as income and financial health, including the past, present, and future.  Technical analysis emphasizes movements and formations of stock prices. Fundamental analysis is based on factors that over time have proved to have a meaningful impact on stock price movements.  The optimal picture of corporate profitability is steady growth, both in the past and, prospectively, in the coming years.  Steady growth is rewarded by higher valuations of underlying earning power than those accorded companies with erratic progress. When professionals screen (filter) the data of the broad universe of stocks, they look for companies that move ahead every year, regardless of the prevailing economic conditions.  Although high pas...
Post a Comment
Read more

Sound Advice: July 26, 2023

Is Day Trading a Good Idea? Day trading can be both exciting and potentially profitable, but it also comes with significant risks and challenges. Whether it's a good idea depends on several factors, including your financial situation, risk tolerance, time commitment, and knowledge of the markets. Here are some considerations to keep in mind: Risk and volatility: Day trading involves buying and selling securities within a short time frame, often within the same day. This exposes you to the inherent volatility and risks of the market. Prices can fluctuate rapidly, and unexpected events can have a significant impact on stock prices, making it challenging to consistently make profits. Time commitment: Day trading requires a substantial time commitment. It involves closely monitoring market movements, conducting research, and executing trades. It can be stressful and demanding, as you need to be actively engaged in the market during t...
Post a Comment
Read more