Skip to main content

Sound Advice: February 15, 2023

“ . . . the daily machinations of the stock market are like a tale told by an idiot, full of sound and fury, signifying nothing.”

                                                                                           John Bogle, founder of Vanguard

 One can only be mystified by the ongoing torrent of verbiage about the stock market’s dramatic movements from day to day, much less moment by moment, and how those who would consider themselves investors pay any attention.  Yet with straight faces the “experts” maintain nonstop development and regurgitation of essentially useless explanations for whatever is happening on Wall Street at any given time.

Indeed, the latest report on changes in the Consumer Price Index (CPI) was preceded by the usual variety of baseless forecasts including one from the esteemed folks at JPMorgan, who let it be known that the Standard & Poor’s 500 Index would drop 2.5% if that index of inflation came in between 6.4% and 6.5%.  Sure enough, the number was 6.4%, which showed a further moderation of price advances.  But no, the S&P did not fall 2.5% and even if it did there was no reason to believe the day’s result in any way supported that forecast.

Similarly, at the start of this month, the consensus view of economists was that the number of jobs created in January was 187,000.  Perhaps the batteries on their crystal balls needed charging, but the actual number of new jobs turned out to be nearly triple the estimate.  What’s more, the unemployment rate fell to the lowest level since May, 1969.  As has happened many times before: They were way off target.

Pronouncements such as these are not just to be taken with a grain of salt.  They should be ignored entirely.

Although there is good reason to expect that the long-term direction of the stock market is higher, suggestions of what may take place in the days, weeks or months ahead are utterly worthless.  Changes in investor psychology are what drives the market during shorter spans of time.  Changes in the underlying profitability of the companies that folks invest in are what drive their shares’ price over longer periods of time.

Economics is another story.  Appraisals of that sort may be useful to explain what has already happened, but the history of forward-looking explanations coming from that supposed field of expertise is not one that inspires sufficient confidence to pay much attention.     

N. Russell Wayne, CFPÒ

www.soundasset.com


Any questions?  Please contact me at nrwayne@soundasset.com

 

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Sound Advice: March 10, 2021

The ABCs of Stock Picking After decades of analyzing stocks (and funds) and investing for clients, I'm happy to share in plain English what's involved, what works, and what doesn't.  Keep in mind the reality that successful stock picking is an effort to maintain a good batting average. In baseball, a batting average of .300 or better is considered quite good.  With stock picking, you need to do better than .600, which means you have many more winners than losers. No one gets it right all of the time.  It's not even close.  Wall Street shops all have their recommended lists and the financial media regularly hawk 10 stocks to buy now. Following that road usually is a direct route to disaster.  Don't be tempted. Let's begin with the big picture: The stock market goes up and down over time, but the long-term trend is up.  When there's a rally under way, everyone feels like a genius.  When the market hits an air pocket, though, with few exception...

Sound Advice: January 3, 2025

2025 Market Forecasts: Stupidity Taken To An Extreme   If you know anything about stock market performance, you can only gag at the nonsense “esteemed forecasters” are now putting forth about the prospective path of stocks in the year ahead.   Our cousins in the UK would call this rubbish.   I would not be as kind. Leading the Ship of Fools is the forecast from the Chief Investment Strategist at Oppenheimer who is looking for a year-end 2025 level for the Standard & Poor’s Index of 7,100, a whopping 21% increase from the most recent standing.   Indeed, most of these folks are looking for double-digit gains.   Only two expect stocks to weaken. In the last 30 years, the market has risen by more than 20% only 15 times.   The exceptional span during that time was 1996-1999, which accounted for four of those jumps.   What followed in 2000 through 2002 was the polar opposite: 2000:      -9.1% 2001:     -11.9% ...

Sound Advice: January 15, 2025

Why investors shouldn't pay attention to Wall Street forecasts   Investors shouldn't pay attention to Wall Street forecasts for several compelling reasons: Poor accuracy Wall Street forecasts have a terrible track record of accuracy. Studies show that their predictions are often no better than random chance, with accuracy rates as low as 47%   Some prominent analysts even perform worse, with accuracy ratings as low as 35% Consistent overestimation Analysts consistently overestimate earnings growth, predicting 10-12%                 annual growth when the reality is closer to 6%.   This overoptimism can                 lead investors to make overly aggressive bets in the market. Inability to predict unpredictable events The stock market is influenced by numerous unpredictable factors, including geopolitical events, technological changes, and company-specific news.   Anal...