Skip to main content

Sound Advice: February 15, 2023

“ . . . the daily machinations of the stock market are like a tale told by an idiot, full of sound and fury, signifying nothing.”

                                                                                           John Bogle, founder of Vanguard

 One can only be mystified by the ongoing torrent of verbiage about the stock market’s dramatic movements from day to day, much less moment by moment, and how those who would consider themselves investors pay any attention.  Yet with straight faces the “experts” maintain nonstop development and regurgitation of essentially useless explanations for whatever is happening on Wall Street at any given time.

Indeed, the latest report on changes in the Consumer Price Index (CPI) was preceded by the usual variety of baseless forecasts including one from the esteemed folks at JPMorgan, who let it be known that the Standard & Poor’s 500 Index would drop 2.5% if that index of inflation came in between 6.4% and 6.5%.  Sure enough, the number was 6.4%, which showed a further moderation of price advances.  But no, the S&P did not fall 2.5% and even if it did there was no reason to believe the day’s result in any way supported that forecast.

Similarly, at the start of this month, the consensus view of economists was that the number of jobs created in January was 187,000.  Perhaps the batteries on their crystal balls needed charging, but the actual number of new jobs turned out to be nearly triple the estimate.  What’s more, the unemployment rate fell to the lowest level since May, 1969.  As has happened many times before: They were way off target.

Pronouncements such as these are not just to be taken with a grain of salt.  They should be ignored entirely.

Although there is good reason to expect that the long-term direction of the stock market is higher, suggestions of what may take place in the days, weeks or months ahead are utterly worthless.  Changes in investor psychology are what drives the market during shorter spans of time.  Changes in the underlying profitability of the companies that folks invest in are what drive their shares’ price over longer periods of time.

Economics is another story.  Appraisals of that sort may be useful to explain what has already happened, but the history of forward-looking explanations coming from that supposed field of expertise is not one that inspires sufficient confidence to pay much attention.     

N. Russell Wayne, CFPÒ

www.soundasset.com


Any questions?  Please contact me at nrwayne@soundasset.com

 

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Sound Advice: July 16, 2025

Fixed annuities are poor investments Fixed annuities are often criticized as poor investments for several reasons, despite their reputation for providing stable, predictable income.  Here are the key drawbacks and concerns:   High Fees and Commissions Internal Fees:  Fixed annuities can carry a range of fees, including administrative charges, mortality expense risk fees, and rider fees. These can add up to 2%–4% per year, significantly eroding returns over time. Commissions:  Sales agents and financial advisors often receive high commissions for selling annuities—sometimes as much as 5%–8% of the invested amount. This creates a financial incentive for advisers to recommend them, even when they may not be the best fit for the client. Comparison to Other Investments:  Mutual funds and ETFs typically have much lower fees and commissions, making them more cost-effective for long-term growth. Limited Growth a...
Post a Comment
Read more

Sound Advice: October 8, 2025

How many investors have outperformed the stock market over the last 20 years? Very few investors have outperformed the stock market over the past 20 years.   Data shows that only about 6% to 8% of actively managed equity funds in the U.S. beat the market over this period, with the vast majority—over 90%—underperforming the S&P 500 or equivalent broad indexes. Percentage of Investors Beating the Market Only 8% of equity funds investing in large companies managed to outperform the market over a recent 20-year span. About 94% of all domestic funds underperformed the S&P 1500 Composite Index from 2005-2024. Over shorter timeframes (5-10 years), typically fewer than 15-20% of fund managers beat the S&P 500, and performance persistence is rare. Why It Is Rare The S&P 500’s high returns have proven immensely difficult to beat, especially as indexing has become popular and markets have ...
Post a Comment
Read more

Sound Advice: January 15, 2025

Why investors shouldn't pay attention to Wall Street forecasts   Investors shouldn't pay attention to Wall Street forecasts for several compelling reasons: Poor accuracy Wall Street forecasts have a terrible track record of accuracy. Studies show that their predictions are often no better than random chance, with accuracy rates as low as 47%   Some prominent analysts even perform worse, with accuracy ratings as low as 35% Consistent overestimation Analysts consistently overestimate earnings growth, predicting 10-12%                 annual growth when the reality is closer to 6%.   This overoptimism can                 lead investors to make overly aggressive bets in the market. Inability to predict unpredictable events The stock market is influenced by numerous unpredictable factors, including geopolitical events, technological changes, and company-specific news.   Anal...
Post a Comment
Read more