Skip to main content

Sound Advice: February 15, 2023

“ . . . the daily machinations of the stock market are like a tale told by an idiot, full of sound and fury, signifying nothing.”

                                                                                           John Bogle, founder of Vanguard

 One can only be mystified by the ongoing torrent of verbiage about the stock market’s dramatic movements from day to day, much less moment by moment, and how those who would consider themselves investors pay any attention.  Yet with straight faces the “experts” maintain nonstop development and regurgitation of essentially useless explanations for whatever is happening on Wall Street at any given time.

Indeed, the latest report on changes in the Consumer Price Index (CPI) was preceded by the usual variety of baseless forecasts including one from the esteemed folks at JPMorgan, who let it be known that the Standard & Poor’s 500 Index would drop 2.5% if that index of inflation came in between 6.4% and 6.5%.  Sure enough, the number was 6.4%, which showed a further moderation of price advances.  But no, the S&P did not fall 2.5% and even if it did there was no reason to believe the day’s result in any way supported that forecast.

Similarly, at the start of this month, the consensus view of economists was that the number of jobs created in January was 187,000.  Perhaps the batteries on their crystal balls needed charging, but the actual number of new jobs turned out to be nearly triple the estimate.  What’s more, the unemployment rate fell to the lowest level since May, 1969.  As has happened many times before: They were way off target.

Pronouncements such as these are not just to be taken with a grain of salt.  They should be ignored entirely.

Although there is good reason to expect that the long-term direction of the stock market is higher, suggestions of what may take place in the days, weeks or months ahead are utterly worthless.  Changes in investor psychology are what drives the market during shorter spans of time.  Changes in the underlying profitability of the companies that folks invest in are what drive their shares’ price over longer periods of time.

Economics is another story.  Appraisals of that sort may be useful to explain what has already happened, but the history of forward-looking explanations coming from that supposed field of expertise is not one that inspires sufficient confidence to pay much attention.     

N. Russell Wayne, CFPÒ

www.soundasset.com


Any questions?  Please contact me at nrwayne@soundasset.com

 

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Sound Advice: September 30, 2026

Now what? For many women, there comes a time when financial confusion reigns.   It may come after a spouse passes or a marriage goes off the rails.   It’s the same situation for women who never married. The questions are many.   The answers may be few.   Toward the top of the list of concerns is the issue of understanding.   Although there are always complex matters, it’s essential that all of the elements are clearly presented in a straightforward fashion.   There’s more.   Presentation is one thing, but comprehension is another. If there’s a question, it must be asked.   Clarity is the key.   Don’t just say I get it when you don’t.   And, it’s essential to grasp how each of the items fits in the overall situation. In the absence of understanding, no decisions will be made. Here are some of the most pressing questions? What’s the smart way to handle my investments? Where should I go for advice? A bank, stockbroker, attor...

Sound Advice: September 19, 2026

Is AI good news or bad news for investments? AI is potentially very good news for investors—but not automatically good news for every investment . The key distinction is between AI as an economic technology and AI stocks at today's prices . As of September 2026, there are compelling reasons for both optimism and caution: The bullish case: AI spending remains enormous. Gartner estimates global AI spending at $2.7 trillion in 2026 , up 49.5% year over year. If AI produces sustained productivity gains, corporate profits could expand well beyond the companies currently selling AI hardware. The valuation case: Investors have already priced in a lot of success. Valuations of major AI companies are elevated and expected long-term earnings growth is well above historical norms. The spending-risk case: The five largest hyperscalers are expected to spend more than $1 trillion on AI-related capital expendit...

Sound Advice: October 14, 2026

Why your adviser must be a fiduciary   You should insist that your financial adviser be a fiduciary because a fiduciary is legally obligated, when acting in a fiduciary capacity, to put your interests ahead of their own and manage conflicts of interest appropriately. Key reasons: Your interests come first. A fiduciary duty requires the adviser to act in your best interest rather than simply recommending something that is suitable or profitable for them. Fewer conflicts of interest. Some advisers can receive commissions, bonuses, or other compensation for recommending particular investments or insurance products. A fiduciary must address material conflicts rather than allowing them to drive the recommendation. Greater transparency. Fiduciary advisers generally have obligations concerning disclosure, fees, conflicts, and how they are compensated. That makes it easier for you to understand what you're actually paying. Better alignment over the long term. A good adviser sh...