Skip to main content

Sound Advice: January 18, 2023

Crypto Eulogy

Late last March, when bitcoins were at their year’s peak above $47,000, I was interviewed by Paul Vigna of The Wall Street Journal, who asked me about my thoughts on cryptocurrency.  Rather than an extensive response with all the reasons for my opinion, I offered a simple answer: “My clients would kill me if I bought bitcoins for their accounts.”  Since then, the ceiling has all but caved in on this and other fantasy currencies, not surprising since, in the words of Mihir A. Desai, professor at Harvard Business School and Harvard Law School, “. . . they are a manifestation of a magical thinking that had come to infect part of the generation who grew up in the aftermath of the Great Recession . . .”

Cryptocurrencies have no underlying value.  There is no consumer protection.  There are no dividends.  So long as they are trading and prices are swinging up and down, those who are willing to accept extraordinary risk may buy for brief periods in expectation of quick gains.  But there is no assurance that will happen.  Indeed, a steady plunge from current levels to the basement is not out of the question.

There have been numerous parallels to cryptomania.  It was only a couple of decades ago when the vanguards of the Dot.Com Era disappeared into the Great Unknown.  Companies such as Pets.com, Webvan, and TheGlobe.com gained extraordinary followings among “investors” in short order and then exited stage left.

Pets.com went public in February, 2000, rose to a high of $14 a share, then fell below $1.  The company went under only nine months after its initial public offering.

Webvan was a grocery delivery service that expanded too quickly.  It went public in November, 1999 with plans to expand to 34 cities within two years.  Its shares rose to $30 shortly after the offering.  Then, only 20 months later, the stock fell to six cents a share and the company announced it would close up shop.

TheGlobe.com was even more exciting.  On the first day its shares were traded, the stock jumped 600% to $97 a share.  Less than two years later, the price fell below $1 a share and the stock was delisted from the NASDAQ exchange. Thereafter, the company briefly continued its online gaming sites, but finally went out of business in 2007.

The common denominator for this cast of characters was the failure to deal with reality.  What seemed to matter at the time was that the stocks were going up.  What was ignored is that the fuel for long-term market success is the profitability of the underlying company.

Crypto and tulips. Amen.

  

 N. Russell Wayne, CFPÒ

www.soundasset.com

 

Any questions?  Please contact me at nrwayne@soundasset.com 


Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Sound Advice: September 19, 2026

Is AI good news or bad news for investments? AI is potentially very good news for investors—but not automatically good news for every investment . The key distinction is between AI as an economic technology and AI stocks at today's prices . As of September 2026, there are compelling reasons for both optimism and caution: The bullish case: AI spending remains enormous. Gartner estimates global AI spending at $2.7 trillion in 2026 , up 49.5% year over year. If AI produces sustained productivity gains, corporate profits could expand well beyond the companies currently selling AI hardware. The valuation case: Investors have already priced in a lot of success. Valuations of major AI companies are elevated and expected long-term earnings growth is well above historical norms. The spending-risk case: The five largest hyperscalers are expected to spend more than $1 trillion on AI-related capital expendit...
Post a Comment
Read more

Sound Advice: September 30, 2026

Now what? For many women, there comes a time when financial confusion reigns.   It may come after a spouse passes or a marriage goes off the rails.   It’s the same situation for women who never married. The questions are many.   The answers may be few.   Toward the top of the list of concerns is the issue of understanding.   Although there are always complex matters, it’s essential that all of the elements are clearly presented in a straightforward fashion.   There’s more.   Presentation is one thing, but comprehension is another. If there’s a question, it must be asked.   Clarity is the key.   Don’t just say I get it when you don’t.   And, it’s essential to grasp how each of the items fits in the overall situation. In the absence of understanding, no decisions will be made. Here are some of the most pressing questions? What’s the smart way to handle my investments? Where should I go for advice? A bank, stockbroker, attor...
Post a Comment
Read more

Sound Advice: October 14, 2026

Why your adviser must be a fiduciary   You should insist that your financial adviser be a fiduciary because a fiduciary is legally obligated, when acting in a fiduciary capacity, to put your interests ahead of their own and manage conflicts of interest appropriately. Key reasons: Your interests come first. A fiduciary duty requires the adviser to act in your best interest rather than simply recommending something that is suitable or profitable for them. Fewer conflicts of interest. Some advisers can receive commissions, bonuses, or other compensation for recommending particular investments or insurance products. A fiduciary must address material conflicts rather than allowing them to drive the recommendation. Greater transparency. Fiduciary advisers generally have obligations concerning disclosure, fees, conflicts, and how they are compensated. That makes it easier for you to understand what you're actually paying. Better alignment over the long term. A good adviser sh...
Post a Comment
Read more