Skip to main content

Sound Advice: January 18, 2023

Crypto Eulogy

Late last March, when bitcoins were at their year’s peak above $47,000, I was interviewed by Paul Vigna of The Wall Street Journal, who asked me about my thoughts on cryptocurrency.  Rather than an extensive response with all the reasons for my opinion, I offered a simple answer: “My clients would kill me if I bought bitcoins for their accounts.”  Since then, the ceiling has all but caved in on this and other fantasy currencies, not surprising since, in the words of Mihir A. Desai, professor at Harvard Business School and Harvard Law School, “. . . they are a manifestation of a magical thinking that had come to infect part of the generation who grew up in the aftermath of the Great Recession . . .”

Cryptocurrencies have no underlying value.  There is no consumer protection.  There are no dividends.  So long as they are trading and prices are swinging up and down, those who are willing to accept extraordinary risk may buy for brief periods in expectation of quick gains.  But there is no assurance that will happen.  Indeed, a steady plunge from current levels to the basement is not out of the question.

There have been numerous parallels to cryptomania.  It was only a couple of decades ago when the vanguards of the Dot.Com Era disappeared into the Great Unknown.  Companies such as Pets.com, Webvan, and TheGlobe.com gained extraordinary followings among “investors” in short order and then exited stage left.

Pets.com went public in February, 2000, rose to a high of $14 a share, then fell below $1.  The company went under only nine months after its initial public offering.

Webvan was a grocery delivery service that expanded too quickly.  It went public in November, 1999 with plans to expand to 34 cities within two years.  Its shares rose to $30 shortly after the offering.  Then, only 20 months later, the stock fell to six cents a share and the company announced it would close up shop.

TheGlobe.com was even more exciting.  On the first day its shares were traded, the stock jumped 600% to $97 a share.  Less than two years later, the price fell below $1 a share and the stock was delisted from the NASDAQ exchange. Thereafter, the company briefly continued its online gaming sites, but finally went out of business in 2007.

The common denominator for this cast of characters was the failure to deal with reality.  What seemed to matter at the time was that the stocks were going up.  What was ignored is that the fuel for long-term market success is the profitability of the underlying company.

Crypto and tulips. Amen.

  

 N. Russell Wayne, CFPÒ

www.soundasset.com

 

Any questions?  Please contact me at nrwayne@soundasset.com 


Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Sound Advice: January 3, 2025

2025 Market Forecasts: Stupidity Taken To An Extreme   If you know anything about stock market performance, you can only gag at the nonsense “esteemed forecasters” are now putting forth about the prospective path of stocks in the year ahead.   Our cousins in the UK would call this rubbish.   I would not be as kind. Leading the Ship of Fools is the forecast from the Chief Investment Strategist at Oppenheimer who is looking for a year-end 2025 level for the Standard & Poor’s Index of 7,100, a whopping 21% increase from the most recent standing.   Indeed, most of these folks are looking for double-digit gains.   Only two expect stocks to weaken. In the last 30 years, the market has risen by more than 20% only 15 times.   The exceptional span during that time was 1996-1999, which accounted for four of those jumps.   What followed in 2000 through 2002 was the polar opposite: 2000:      -9.1% 2001:     -11.9% ...
Post a Comment
Read more

Sound Advice: January 15, 2025

Why investors shouldn't pay attention to Wall Street forecasts   Investors shouldn't pay attention to Wall Street forecasts for several compelling reasons: Poor accuracy Wall Street forecasts have a terrible track record of accuracy. Studies show that their predictions are often no better than random chance, with accuracy rates as low as 47%   Some prominent analysts even perform worse, with accuracy ratings as low as 35% Consistent overestimation Analysts consistently overestimate earnings growth, predicting 10-12%                 annual growth when the reality is closer to 6%.   This overoptimism can                 lead investors to make overly aggressive bets in the market. Inability to predict unpredictable events The stock market is influenced by numerous unpredictable factors, including geopolitical events, technological changes, and company-specific news.   Anal...
Post a Comment
Read more

Sound Advice: July 16, 2025

Fixed annuities are poor investments Fixed annuities are often criticized as poor investments for several reasons, despite their reputation for providing stable, predictable income.  Here are the key drawbacks and concerns:   High Fees and Commissions Internal Fees:  Fixed annuities can carry a range of fees, including administrative charges, mortality expense risk fees, and rider fees. These can add up to 2%–4% per year, significantly eroding returns over time. Commissions:  Sales agents and financial advisors often receive high commissions for selling annuities—sometimes as much as 5%–8% of the invested amount. This creates a financial incentive for advisers to recommend them, even when they may not be the best fit for the client. Comparison to Other Investments:  Mutual funds and ETFs typically have much lower fees and commissions, making them more cost-effective for long-term growth. Limited Growth a...
Post a Comment
Read more