Skip to main content

Sound Advice: January 18, 2023

Crypto Eulogy

Late last March, when bitcoins were at their year’s peak above $47,000, I was interviewed by Paul Vigna of The Wall Street Journal, who asked me about my thoughts on cryptocurrency.  Rather than an extensive response with all the reasons for my opinion, I offered a simple answer: “My clients would kill me if I bought bitcoins for their accounts.”  Since then, the ceiling has all but caved in on this and other fantasy currencies, not surprising since, in the words of Mihir A. Desai, professor at Harvard Business School and Harvard Law School, “. . . they are a manifestation of a magical thinking that had come to infect part of the generation who grew up in the aftermath of the Great Recession . . .”

Cryptocurrencies have no underlying value.  There is no consumer protection.  There are no dividends.  So long as they are trading and prices are swinging up and down, those who are willing to accept extraordinary risk may buy for brief periods in expectation of quick gains.  But there is no assurance that will happen.  Indeed, a steady plunge from current levels to the basement is not out of the question.

There have been numerous parallels to cryptomania.  It was only a couple of decades ago when the vanguards of the Dot.Com Era disappeared into the Great Unknown.  Companies such as Pets.com, Webvan, and TheGlobe.com gained extraordinary followings among “investors” in short order and then exited stage left.

Pets.com went public in February, 2000, rose to a high of $14 a share, then fell below $1.  The company went under only nine months after its initial public offering.

Webvan was a grocery delivery service that expanded too quickly.  It went public in November, 1999 with plans to expand to 34 cities within two years.  Its shares rose to $30 shortly after the offering.  Then, only 20 months later, the stock fell to six cents a share and the company announced it would close up shop.

TheGlobe.com was even more exciting.  On the first day its shares were traded, the stock jumped 600% to $97 a share.  Less than two years later, the price fell below $1 a share and the stock was delisted from the NASDAQ exchange. Thereafter, the company briefly continued its online gaming sites, but finally went out of business in 2007.

The common denominator for this cast of characters was the failure to deal with reality.  What seemed to matter at the time was that the stocks were going up.  What was ignored is that the fuel for long-term market success is the profitability of the underlying company.

Crypto and tulips. Amen.

  

 N. Russell Wayne, CFPÒ

www.soundasset.com

 

Any questions?  Please contact me at nrwayne@soundasset.com 


Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Sound Advice: February 21, 2024

800-000-0000 That’s 800-000-0000 Again, 800-000-0000 That’s the typical closing for the hard sell commercials that are increasingly polluting media airwaves.   These are the commercials for products or services you rarely need or most definitely should avoid. A substantial number are on behalf of groups of attorneys who would have you believe that you and many others may be entitled to cash compensation for having used or being exposed to some evil item or substance some time in the last few decades.   The pitch always includes a comment that there’s no cost to you unless there is a settlement in your favor. Much of this is rubbish, but when the appeal suggests that there’s nothing to lose, why not take a shot.   And, as you would expect, “advisors” are standing by 24/7 to take your call and help get the process in motion.   What kind of advisor would be available at 3 a.m.? One version of this approach pops up every year between October 15 th and Decemb...

Sound Advice: September 21, 2022

The Professional Approach To Stock Selection There are various approaches to stock selection, but the two that predominate are fundamental analysis and technical analysis.  Fundamental analysis is a numbers-based method that evaluates key factors such as income and financial health, including the past, present, and future.  Technical analysis emphasizes movements and formations of stock prices. Fundamental analysis is based on factors that over time have proved to have a meaningful impact on stock price movements.  The optimal picture of corporate profitability is steady growth, both in the past and, prospectively, in the coming years.  Steady growth is rewarded by higher valuations of underlying earning power than those accorded companies with erratic progress. When professionals screen (filter) the data of the broad universe of stocks, they look for companies that move ahead every year, regardless of the prevailing economic conditions.  Although high pas...

Sound Advice: July 26, 2023

Is Day Trading a Good Idea? Day trading can be both exciting and potentially profitable, but it also comes with significant risks and challenges. Whether it's a good idea depends on several factors, including your financial situation, risk tolerance, time commitment, and knowledge of the markets. Here are some considerations to keep in mind: Risk and volatility: Day trading involves buying and selling securities within a short time frame, often within the same day. This exposes you to the inherent volatility and risks of the market. Prices can fluctuate rapidly, and unexpected events can have a significant impact on stock prices, making it challenging to consistently make profits. Time commitment: Day trading requires a substantial time commitment. It involves closely monitoring market movements, conducting research, and executing trades. It can be stressful and demanding, as you need to be actively engaged in the market during t...