Skip to main content

Sound Advice: November 9, 2022

The paradox of changing interest rates

With rare exception, the predominant belief is that when interest rates are rising, the stock market will slide . . . and vice-versa.  As recently as the early part of 2020, when the pandemic led to a widespread plunge in the economy, the Fed slashed interest rates and stocks did an abrupt about-face following a distressing drop and ended up the year with a well above average gain.  A silver bullet, indeed.  But the reality is that over extended periods, there’s more than sufficient evidence to show that the market’s reactions to the Fed’s efforts to stimulate or ease the pace of the economy vary widely.

At the moment, we are faced with an inflation rate in the high single digits and, despite the central bank’s recent series of unusually high hikes in the federal funds rate, one suspects that even more tightening will be needed to get an unacceptably high rate of price increases under control.  Over the last 50 years, when the Fed did approve a change, it was almost always in the range of 0.25% to 0.50%, the latter viewed as rather hefty.  Yet, in all three of their latest three meetings, the governors voted for increases of 0.75%.  And there may well be more of these to come.

Given the stock market’s extended pullback so far this year, one has to wonder whether there may be more big dips ahead.  A look at what happened during each of the last five periods of rising rates (a span from February, 1994 to July, 2019) suggests a less pessimistic picture.  The average market change, as measured by the Dow Jones Industrial Average, while rates were climbing was a gain of 62.9%.  One of the more interesting examples was the time from June 29, 2004 to September 17, 2007 when the federal funds rate skyrocketed from 1.0% to 5.25% . . . and the Dow gained 28.7%.

Yes, this time is different.  Rates have been going up much more rapidly than ever before.  Even so, there will come a point when the impact of tighter monetary policy starts to produce the hoped-for results.  The risk is that, as has often been the case in the past, the economy will be hit too hard.  That will lead to a subsequent easing.

Once the prospect of rate easing emerges, stocks will rebound and bonds, which have been hit by rising interest rates, will also be positioned to provide both a reasonable current yield and price appreciation. 

We are not there yet, but could be within a matter of months.       

N. Russell Wayne, CFPÒ

www.soundasset.com

Any questions?  Please contact me at nrwayne@soundasset.com

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Sound Advice: January 3, 2025

2025 Market Forecasts: Stupidity Taken To An Extreme   If you know anything about stock market performance, you can only gag at the nonsense “esteemed forecasters” are now putting forth about the prospective path of stocks in the year ahead.   Our cousins in the UK would call this rubbish.   I would not be as kind. Leading the Ship of Fools is the forecast from the Chief Investment Strategist at Oppenheimer who is looking for a year-end 2025 level for the Standard & Poor’s Index of 7,100, a whopping 21% increase from the most recent standing.   Indeed, most of these folks are looking for double-digit gains.   Only two expect stocks to weaken. In the last 30 years, the market has risen by more than 20% only 15 times.   The exceptional span during that time was 1996-1999, which accounted for four of those jumps.   What followed in 2000 through 2002 was the polar opposite: 2000:      -9.1% 2001:     -11.9% ...

Sound Advice: January 15, 2025

Why investors shouldn't pay attention to Wall Street forecasts   Investors shouldn't pay attention to Wall Street forecasts for several compelling reasons: Poor accuracy Wall Street forecasts have a terrible track record of accuracy. Studies show that their predictions are often no better than random chance, with accuracy rates as low as 47%   Some prominent analysts even perform worse, with accuracy ratings as low as 35% Consistent overestimation Analysts consistently overestimate earnings growth, predicting 10-12%                 annual growth when the reality is closer to 6%.   This overoptimism can                 lead investors to make overly aggressive bets in the market. Inability to predict unpredictable events The stock market is influenced by numerous unpredictable factors, including geopolitical events, technological changes, and company-specific news.   Anal...

Sound Advice: July 16, 2025

Fixed annuities are poor investments Fixed annuities are often criticized as poor investments for several reasons, despite their reputation for providing stable, predictable income.  Here are the key drawbacks and concerns:   High Fees and Commissions Internal Fees:  Fixed annuities can carry a range of fees, including administrative charges, mortality expense risk fees, and rider fees. These can add up to 2%–4% per year, significantly eroding returns over time. Commissions:  Sales agents and financial advisors often receive high commissions for selling annuities—sometimes as much as 5%–8% of the invested amount. This creates a financial incentive for advisers to recommend them, even when they may not be the best fit for the client. Comparison to Other Investments:  Mutual funds and ETFs typically have much lower fees and commissions, making them more cost-effective for long-term growth. Limited Growth a...