How do brokers make money with zero commissions
on trades?
That’s a question many investors are asking. If stock trades are free, one may well assume
that there’s something fishy . . . and there is, though there is an ongoing
controversy about whether any rules are being broken.
The key phrase is payment for order flow (PFOF), which
is what brokerage firms receive for directing trades to a particular market
maker for execution. These payments are
typically fractions of a penny per share, but they add up to substantial sums
when cumulated by the volume of trades taking place.
The Golden Rule for trading is best execution, which
means that brokers are required to get the lowest prices when buying and
highest prices for selling on behalf of its clients. As long as this rule is followed, no lines
are crossed, but when brokers direct trades to market makers who may be
specializing in certain stocks, it becomes a gray area, especially when the
trades are done at other than the best prices.
When questioned about executions, brokers tend to rely
on claims of the better liquidity provided by these firms. The more problematic situations are those
that involve smaller brokerage firms, which may have difficulty handling large
trades. The flip side of PFOF is the
increased cost to clients as a result of inferior execution.
This practice led to agency intervention in late 2020,
when the SEC fined Robinhood Markets $65 million for failing to properly
disclose to customers PFOF payments it received for trades that did not result
in best execution. Trading in meme
stocks seems to have been an area where these kinds of abuses have taken place.
Although zero commissions are now widespread, it
should come as no surprise that offsetting revenues from things such as PFOF have
increased considerably to reduce the shortfall.
A recent study by Piper Sandler, a NY-based investment bank, showed PFOF
revenues from equity trading of major brokerage houses up from 27% to 122% from
the first quarter to the second quarter of 2020.
Payment for order flow isn’t the only tool being used
to fill the gap. Other revenue sources
include interest, margin lending, and fees for new or updated services. One way or another these companies will find
ways to keep their profits flowing, especially when they appear to be executing
trades at no cost.
Free lunch? Not
exactly, but in most cases clean enough to pass the test.
N. Russell Wayne, CFPÒ
Any questions? Please contact me at nrwayne@soundasset.com
Comments
Post a Comment