Skip to main content

Sound Advice: November 2, 2022

The investment times they are a’changing.

Turn the clock back to the 1950s and 1960s and you’ll be back in a time when stockbrokers were the gatekeepers of the investment markets for most investors.  Those were the early days of stocks and bonds, customers’ men who got one or more shoeshines daily, and commissions for individual stock trades were $100 or more.  Mutual funds were still a new concept.  Exchange-traded funds, largely a new millennium addition to the roster of investment vehicles, barely existed.

In May, 1975, things changed dramatically.  That’s when President Gerald Ford signed the Securities Acts amendments, which started the process of commission discounting.  Now, nearly half a century later, commissions are down to zero at most broker-dealers.

Back in those early days, mutual funds were quite costly.  The entry fee for new investments, known as a load, a.k.a. sales charge, was 8%.  So when you invested $1,000, you had an immediate loss of $80.  These days, many, if not most, mutual funds are available on a no-load basis and you begin with an investment that’s worth what you paid for it.

Another concept of note was wrap accounts, which began in the late 1990s.  Those were packaged advisory accounts that included investment manager services and brokerage commissions, a combination that proved quite appealing for people seeking ongoing professional assistance.  Initially, the cost of these accounts was a hefty 3% of asset value annually, which dropped substantially in the period that followed.  Currently, the fee for wrap accounts is in the range of 1.25% to 1.5%.

The last few years have seen the rise of robo accounts, which place the tasks of management and trading under the control of computer models.  What’s typically seen as good news is the very low fee structure, which may well be in the range of 0.20% to 0.40% per year.  The other side of the picture is discouraging.  Although the investments are intended to be properly diversified, the net result of these machinations will probably be no better than what would be available through do-it-yourself efforts spread among a few total stock and bond market funds.  In addition, some robos invest in homegrown funds from which they reap fees and there is often a significant portion held in cash, so not all of your funds are working for you.

One more thing: There’s no personal interaction.  It’s just you and the computer.  Not very comforting.     

N. Russell Wayne, CFPÒ

www.soundasset.com

Any questions?  Please contact me at nrwayne@soundasset.com

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Sound Advice: March 10, 2021

The ABCs of Stock Picking After decades of analyzing stocks (and funds) and investing for clients, I'm happy to share in plain English what's involved, what works, and what doesn't.  Keep in mind the reality that successful stock picking is an effort to maintain a good batting average. In baseball, a batting average of .300 or better is considered quite good.  With stock picking, you need to do better than .600, which means you have many more winners than losers. No one gets it right all of the time.  It's not even close.  Wall Street shops all have their recommended lists and the financial media regularly hawk 10 stocks to buy now. Following that road usually is a direct route to disaster.  Don't be tempted. Let's begin with the big picture: The stock market goes up and down over time, but the long-term trend is up.  When there's a rally under way, everyone feels like a genius.  When the market hits an air pocket, though, with few exception...
Post a Comment
Read more

Sound Advice: January 3, 2025

2025 Market Forecasts: Stupidity Taken To An Extreme   If you know anything about stock market performance, you can only gag at the nonsense “esteemed forecasters” are now putting forth about the prospective path of stocks in the year ahead.   Our cousins in the UK would call this rubbish.   I would not be as kind. Leading the Ship of Fools is the forecast from the Chief Investment Strategist at Oppenheimer who is looking for a year-end 2025 level for the Standard & Poor’s Index of 7,100, a whopping 21% increase from the most recent standing.   Indeed, most of these folks are looking for double-digit gains.   Only two expect stocks to weaken. In the last 30 years, the market has risen by more than 20% only 15 times.   The exceptional span during that time was 1996-1999, which accounted for four of those jumps.   What followed in 2000 through 2002 was the polar opposite: 2000:      -9.1% 2001:     -11.9% ...
Post a Comment
Read more

Sound Advice: June 17, 2020

Rock and a Hard Place Regardless of your age, impressions from childhood linger.  As the first days of summer approach, we all remember the feeling that accompanied the end of a school year.  Yet as much as many of us would like to believe we again have the summertime freedom to do as we wish, the reality is quite the opposite. Although months of confinement and limitations on social interaction have increased our personal discomfort and severely impacted the business community, our current situation is not analogous to the end of any school year.  It’s quite the opposite. There is every reason to continue wearing face masks, social distancing, and avoiding close contact with others.  Nothing suggests that we can modify our behavior significantly or resume patterns of daily living we enjoyed only a few months ago. There are no meaningful advances in medical treatments.  At best, there are attempts to combine different approaches...
Post a Comment
Read more