Skip to main content

Sound Advice: October 26, 2022

Why Technical Analysis Is Useless

(Excerpted from Seeking Alpha)

  • Pure technical trading strategy is fruitless.

“Fidelity recently conducted a study to identify their best performing clients.

They neatly fell into two groups: people who forgot they had an account at Fidelity, and dead people.

It all underlines the futility of trading the markets without true professional guidance, something many aspire to, but few actually accomplish.

This is an industry filled with professional marketers, charlatans, and con men.

Let me point out a few harsh lessons learned from a recent (2017) meltdown, and the rip-your-face-off rally that followed.

We are now transitioning from a “Sell in May” to a “Buy in November” posture.

The period from October to March is one of historical seasonal market strength (click here for the misty origins of this trend at “If You Sell in May, What To Do in April?”)

The big lesson learned was the utter uselessness of technical analyses.  Usually, these guys are right only 50% of the time. That year, they missed the boat entirely.

When the S&P 500 (SPY) was meandering in a narrow nine-point range, and the Volatility Index (VIX) hugged the $9-$12 neighborhood, they said this would continue for the rest of the year.


It didn’t.  The biggest losers?  Algorithms, which used the decisive break of the (SPY) $245 level in August, 2017 to go heavily short.

If you did, you lost your shirt. The market just shed a couple more points, reversed, and then kept going, and going, and going.

And if you tried to go long the contango stunted VIX Short Term Futures ETN (VXX), then every trader would of gotten crushed from mid-August on.


This is why technical analysis is utterly useless as an investment strategy.  How many hedge funds use a pure technical strategy on a standalone basis?

Absolutely none, as it doesn’t make any money.

At best, it is just one of 100 tools you need to trade the market effectively. The shorter the time frame, the more accurate it becomes.

On an intraday basis, technical analysis is actually quite useful. But I doubt few of you engage in this hopeless persuasion.

Leave it for the kids.

This is why I advise portfolio managers and financial advisors to use technical analysis as a means of timing order executions, and nothing more.

Most professionals agree with me.

Technical analysis derives from humans’ preference for looking at pictures instead of engaging in abstract mental processes. A picture is worth 1,000 words, and probably a lot more.

This is why technical analysis appeals to so many young people entering the market for the first time.”

N. Russell Wayne, CFP®

www.soundasset.com

www.soundasset.blogspot.com

Any questions? Please contact me at nrwayne@soundasset.com


Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Sound Advice: January 3, 2025

2025 Market Forecasts: Stupidity Taken To An Extreme   If you know anything about stock market performance, you can only gag at the nonsense “esteemed forecasters” are now putting forth about the prospective path of stocks in the year ahead.   Our cousins in the UK would call this rubbish.   I would not be as kind. Leading the Ship of Fools is the forecast from the Chief Investment Strategist at Oppenheimer who is looking for a year-end 2025 level for the Standard & Poor’s Index of 7,100, a whopping 21% increase from the most recent standing.   Indeed, most of these folks are looking for double-digit gains.   Only two expect stocks to weaken. In the last 30 years, the market has risen by more than 20% only 15 times.   The exceptional span during that time was 1996-1999, which accounted for four of those jumps.   What followed in 2000 through 2002 was the polar opposite: 2000:      -9.1% 2001:     -11.9% ...
Post a Comment
Read more

Sound Advice: January 15, 2025

Why investors shouldn't pay attention to Wall Street forecasts   Investors shouldn't pay attention to Wall Street forecasts for several compelling reasons: Poor accuracy Wall Street forecasts have a terrible track record of accuracy. Studies show that their predictions are often no better than random chance, with accuracy rates as low as 47%   Some prominent analysts even perform worse, with accuracy ratings as low as 35% Consistent overestimation Analysts consistently overestimate earnings growth, predicting 10-12%                 annual growth when the reality is closer to 6%.   This overoptimism can                 lead investors to make overly aggressive bets in the market. Inability to predict unpredictable events The stock market is influenced by numerous unpredictable factors, including geopolitical events, technological changes, and company-specific news.   Anal...
Post a Comment
Read more

Sound Advice: July 16, 2025

Fixed annuities are poor investments Fixed annuities are often criticized as poor investments for several reasons, despite their reputation for providing stable, predictable income.  Here are the key drawbacks and concerns:   High Fees and Commissions Internal Fees:  Fixed annuities can carry a range of fees, including administrative charges, mortality expense risk fees, and rider fees. These can add up to 2%–4% per year, significantly eroding returns over time. Commissions:  Sales agents and financial advisors often receive high commissions for selling annuities—sometimes as much as 5%–8% of the invested amount. This creates a financial incentive for advisers to recommend them, even when they may not be the best fit for the client. Comparison to Other Investments:  Mutual funds and ETFs typically have much lower fees and commissions, making them more cost-effective for long-term growth. Limited Growth a...
Post a Comment
Read more