Skip to main content

Sound Advice: September 21, 2022

The Professional Approach To Stock Selection

There are various approaches to stock selection, but the two that predominate are fundamental analysis and technical analysis.  Fundamental analysis is a numbers-based method that evaluates key factors such as income and financial health, including the past, present, and future.  Technical analysis emphasizes movements and formations of stock prices.

Fundamental analysis is based on factors that over time have proved to have a meaningful impact on stock price movements.  The optimal picture of corporate profitability is steady growth, both in the past and, prospectively, in the coming years.  Steady growth is rewarded by higher valuations of underlying earning power than those accorded companies with erratic progress.

When professionals screen (filter) the data of the broad universe of stocks, they look for companies that move ahead every year, regardless of the prevailing economic conditions.  Although high past growth is no guarantee of what’s to come, it does tend to build greater confidence in where things are likely to go in the period ahead.

Growth companies are not the only ones worth considering.  Cyclical companies, those whose results reflect changes in the economy, may be interesting candidates when their stock prices are depressed prior to a time of rebound.  For these, however, timing is critical.

In all cases, an evaluation of financial health is essential.  A simple measure of same is a view of free cash flow.  Companies that earn enough to more than cover their expenses, debt obligations, dividend payments, and the like, are in the best possible shape.  That’s true even if they begin with relatively little in the bank.  The ability to generate excess funds every year makes weak companies strong and strong companies stronger.

Another important part of fundamental analysis is valuation.  Stock prices are generally based on a multiple of underlying profits.  If, for example, a company earns $2.00 a share (e.g., company profits of $2 million divided by one million shares), a fast-growing company’s stock might sell for 20 times $2.00 a share.  That’s a price of $40.  A slower growing company might sell for 10 times earnings, i.e., the price-earnings multiple.

Then there’s technical analysis, a school of bizarre thought that suggests that future pricing can be divined by the range of prices and price patterns of a stock’s history.  There are numerous different shapes and theories considered by those who subscribe to this approach.  Unfortunately, however, there is nothing in the literature of investing that in any way supports the forecasts these folks would have you believe.

Even so, please note: If the fundamental analysis is favorable, but the stock’s price is tumbling, there’s probably something wrong with the fundamental analysis.

N. Russell Wayne, CFPÒ

www.soundasset.com

www.soundasset.blogspot.com


Any questions?  Please contact me at nrwayne@soundasset.com 

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Sound Advice: January 3, 2025

2025 Market Forecasts: Stupidity Taken To An Extreme   If you know anything about stock market performance, you can only gag at the nonsense “esteemed forecasters” are now putting forth about the prospective path of stocks in the year ahead.   Our cousins in the UK would call this rubbish.   I would not be as kind. Leading the Ship of Fools is the forecast from the Chief Investment Strategist at Oppenheimer who is looking for a year-end 2025 level for the Standard & Poor’s Index of 7,100, a whopping 21% increase from the most recent standing.   Indeed, most of these folks are looking for double-digit gains.   Only two expect stocks to weaken. In the last 30 years, the market has risen by more than 20% only 15 times.   The exceptional span during that time was 1996-1999, which accounted for four of those jumps.   What followed in 2000 through 2002 was the polar opposite: 2000:      -9.1% 2001:     -11.9% ...

Sound Advice: January 15, 2025

Why investors shouldn't pay attention to Wall Street forecasts   Investors shouldn't pay attention to Wall Street forecasts for several compelling reasons: Poor accuracy Wall Street forecasts have a terrible track record of accuracy. Studies show that their predictions are often no better than random chance, with accuracy rates as low as 47%   Some prominent analysts even perform worse, with accuracy ratings as low as 35% Consistent overestimation Analysts consistently overestimate earnings growth, predicting 10-12%                 annual growth when the reality is closer to 6%.   This overoptimism can                 lead investors to make overly aggressive bets in the market. Inability to predict unpredictable events The stock market is influenced by numerous unpredictable factors, including geopolitical events, technological changes, and company-specific news.   Anal...

Sound Advice: July 16, 2025

Fixed annuities are poor investments Fixed annuities are often criticized as poor investments for several reasons, despite their reputation for providing stable, predictable income.  Here are the key drawbacks and concerns:   High Fees and Commissions Internal Fees:  Fixed annuities can carry a range of fees, including administrative charges, mortality expense risk fees, and rider fees. These can add up to 2%–4% per year, significantly eroding returns over time. Commissions:  Sales agents and financial advisors often receive high commissions for selling annuities—sometimes as much as 5%–8% of the invested amount. This creates a financial incentive for advisers to recommend them, even when they may not be the best fit for the client. Comparison to Other Investments:  Mutual funds and ETFs typically have much lower fees and commissions, making them more cost-effective for long-term growth. Limited Growth a...