Skip to main content

Sound Advice, September 14, 2022

 Why Exchange-Traded Funds?

It’s hard to believe, but the first mutual fund was created almost 100 years ago.  That was Massachusetts Investors Trust, which was born in 1924 and opened to investors in 1928.  Other funds then came along, though it took four decades for them to develop a substantial following.

The reasoning behind the development of mutual funds was simple.  They offered diversification.  Why buy one or several individual stocks when you could buy funds managed by professionals who could make well-considered selections from the broad universe of all stocks.

The logic seemed reasonable and investors climbed aboard in huge numbers.  But there was more than one hitch.  In those good old days, the cost of making mutual fund investments was rather hefty.  Indeed, the loads (a.k.a., sales charges) for purchases of fund shares tended to be in the upper single digits.  Loads of 8.5% of the amount invested were not uncommon.  So if, for example, you invested $10,000, you began with a loss of $850.

Even if you made a larger investment, there was still a load, though it may have been at a reduced rate.  Not only were these charges of concern, but there was also the cost of managing the funds, which was not inconsiderable.

So it came as no surprise that sales loads were under heavy pressure.  Later on, many funds reduced those charges and some eliminated them completely.  Now, funds with loads are in the area of 5.0%.  Management charges, whether for load or no-load, tend to range between 0.75% and 1.25%.

Then we come to the issue of active management versus passive management.  Active management means there are professionals analyzing and selecting holdings for the fund’s portfolio.  Passive management means the fund’s holdings are intended to duplicate those of an index; there is no active management and the cost is lower.

The hitch is that even though professional management may yield better returns, the cost of that management is greater than the increase in returns.  Thus, in most cases the cost of professional management is not justified by the improvement provided, which is why the popularity of passive funds has continued to grow.

But there’s more.  Unlike stocks, which are bought and sold throughout the trading day, fund transactions take place after the 4:00 p.m. close of trading each day.

The logical next step was the introduction of exchange-traded funds (ETFs), which trade like stocks.  The first of these was SPY, the ETF that mimics the Standard & Poor’s 500 Index.  Now there are more than 8,500 ETFs.  ETFs are available for a broad range of indexes, including equities, both domestic and international, bonds, currencies, commodities, and alternative investments.

The ongoing cost of ETFs is usually much lower than that of mutual funds and there are often ETFs that are similar, if not identical, in holdings to mutual funds offered by the same sponsor.  All of this ends up explaining why investment professionals have increasingly turned to ETFs to round out the portfolios of their clients.

N. Russell Wayne, CFPÒ

www.soundasset.com


Any questions?  Please contact me at nrwayne@soundasset.com

 

 


Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Sound Advice: January 5, 2022

Where do we go from here?   When you consider the wide variety of factors that impact the economy and the investment markets, it would be unrealistic to be encouraged by prospects for the next few years.  Yet, although opportunities for continued progress may be more limited, there are always some worth considering. Let’s put this in perspective.  Following the 23 trading days of The Pandemic Plunge, which saw prices collapse by 34%, the Standard & Poor’s 500 Index then rebounded 113% by the most recent December 31st.  On that date, the forward price-earnings ratio of stocks in the index had risen to a lofty 21.2 compared with a 25-year average of 16.8.  (That ratio is calculated by dividing the latest level of the index (4,766) by the estimated earnings of the included companies for the next 12 months .)  By all measures, that’s a hefty valuation, one that’s even more so since it depends on estimates of what’s to come, which are anything but assured. Other measures confirm

Sound Advice: March 16, 2022

Pullback . . . and then what?   The one certainty about the stock market is well illustrated by an account of a 1955 story about J. Pierpont Morgan given by the U.S. Secretary of the Treasury George M. Humphrey. The story is as follows: Somebody said: ‘Mr. Morgan, you are familiar with the stock market.?’ He said: ‘Yes.’ They said: ‘You know quite a lot about it?’   And he said: ‘Yes, I do.’ They said: ‘Do you think you can tell us what the stock market will do?’   He said: ‘Yes, I can.’   They said: ‘That is very interesting.   Will you please do so?’   He said: ‘Yes. It will fluctuate.’ Equally on point is a quotation from Benjamin Graham, widely known as the father of value investing and co-author with David Dodd of the recognized text on Security Analysis: “Most of the time common stocks are subject to irrational and excessive price fluctuations in both directions as the consequence of the ingrained tendency of most people to speculate or gamble . . . to give way to hop

Sound Advice: March 23, 2022

Interesting Returns   Although the pandemic and the situation in Ukraine remain important concerns, Wall Street has become increasingly focused on unusually high (albeit perhaps temporary) inflation and prospective actions by the Fed to get price increases under control.   Some days, the investment markets react dramatically to developments in this area.   On others, apparent calm prevails. However one views what lies ahead for interest rates, there are certain realities.   As rates rise, prices for bonds fall, especially for those with long maturities.   The offset, though, is the increasing attractiveness of bonds when interest yields on bonds compare more favorably to dividend yields on common stocks. To get a clearer view of the impact of rising interest rates on stocks, I compared the annual changes in interest rates on bonds to the annual returns from the S&P500 stock index for the last 50 years.   Over the five-decade span, rates rose in as many years as they fell. B