Skip to main content

Sound Advice: August 10, 2022

A Good Year For Hedge Funds After Lagging Badly For A Decade   

Investing in a hedge fund may well spark an interesting conversation at a cocktail party, but a closer look at these high-end opportunities tells quite a story.  First, you have to be an accredited investor to join in.  For the typical hedge fund, that means a net worth of at least $1 million, exclusive of your primary residence, as well as an annual income over $200,000 if you’re single, or $300,000 if you’re married.

Then there’s the matter of fees.  The typical fee for a hedge fund investment is 2% of assets managed plus 20% of the profits each year.  That’s a high price to pay, but one would hope that the ostensibly super-bright people running these operations could generate returns that justify the cost.

The reality is that they have not.  Indeed, average hedge fund returns over the latest 10 years have been less than half those of the Standard & Poor’s 500 Index. For that matter, they have lagged behind in every one of the last 10 years.  Since 2012, even in the best four years, the hedge fund index rose no more than 11%. By comparison, S&P returns were double or triple the hedge fund average in their highest years.

This year, however, the hedge funds have done better, slipping only 6.8% through midyear while the leading stock indexes were off 20% or more.  Among the very best was Bridgewater Associates’ Pure Alpha II fund, which cranked out a gain of 32%.  This extraordinary performance was largely the result of a hefty short bet against more than two dozen European companies, following reports that economic growth in the Eurozone was slowing due to rising inflation. The situation on the Continent was further exacerbated by the energy crisis resulting from the conflict in Ukraine. 

Credit where credit is due, but after an extensive span of disappointing returns, it cannot come as much of a surprise that there’s a rare occasion when one of their strategies finally works.

In 2020, Pure Alpha II fell 12.6%, while the S&P rose 18.4%.  In 2021, the fund was up 8% while the stock index was up nearly 27%.  When you add in the rest of the decade’s numbers and then subtract the hefty fees payable, it becomes clear that Pure Alpha II was not exactly a nonstop standout.

Yes, the fund’s European short positions have paid off handsomely so far in 2022, but one good year for Pure Alpha II or the rest of the hedge fund universe does not make up for many years of failing to deliver the goods.

If you’re still interested, be aware that this fund requires a minimum investment of $10 million and investable assets of $7.5 billion.

N. Russell Wayne, CFP®

Sound Asset Management Inc.

Weston, CT  06883

 203-222-9370

 www.soundasset.com

www.soundasset.blogspot.com

 

Any questions?  Please contact me at nrwayne@soundasset.com

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Sound Advice: January 3, 2025

2025 Market Forecasts: Stupidity Taken To An Extreme   If you know anything about stock market performance, you can only gag at the nonsense “esteemed forecasters” are now putting forth about the prospective path of stocks in the year ahead.   Our cousins in the UK would call this rubbish.   I would not be as kind. Leading the Ship of Fools is the forecast from the Chief Investment Strategist at Oppenheimer who is looking for a year-end 2025 level for the Standard & Poor’s Index of 7,100, a whopping 21% increase from the most recent standing.   Indeed, most of these folks are looking for double-digit gains.   Only two expect stocks to weaken. In the last 30 years, the market has risen by more than 20% only 15 times.   The exceptional span during that time was 1996-1999, which accounted for four of those jumps.   What followed in 2000 through 2002 was the polar opposite: 2000:      -9.1% 2001:     -11.9% ...
Post a Comment
Read more

Sound Advice: January 15, 2025

Why investors shouldn't pay attention to Wall Street forecasts   Investors shouldn't pay attention to Wall Street forecasts for several compelling reasons: Poor accuracy Wall Street forecasts have a terrible track record of accuracy. Studies show that their predictions are often no better than random chance, with accuracy rates as low as 47%   Some prominent analysts even perform worse, with accuracy ratings as low as 35% Consistent overestimation Analysts consistently overestimate earnings growth, predicting 10-12%                 annual growth when the reality is closer to 6%.   This overoptimism can                 lead investors to make overly aggressive bets in the market. Inability to predict unpredictable events The stock market is influenced by numerous unpredictable factors, including geopolitical events, technological changes, and company-specific news.   Anal...
Post a Comment
Read more

Sound Advice: July 16, 2025

Fixed annuities are poor investments Fixed annuities are often criticized as poor investments for several reasons, despite their reputation for providing stable, predictable income.  Here are the key drawbacks and concerns:   High Fees and Commissions Internal Fees:  Fixed annuities can carry a range of fees, including administrative charges, mortality expense risk fees, and rider fees. These can add up to 2%–4% per year, significantly eroding returns over time. Commissions:  Sales agents and financial advisors often receive high commissions for selling annuities—sometimes as much as 5%–8% of the invested amount. This creates a financial incentive for advisers to recommend them, even when they may not be the best fit for the client. Comparison to Other Investments:  Mutual funds and ETFs typically have much lower fees and commissions, making them more cost-effective for long-term growth. Limited Growth a...
Post a Comment
Read more