Skip to main content

Sound Advice: July 6, 2022

Should international markets be of interest?

Although the U.S. stock market always seems to be on center stage, investing in international markets has continued to grow, especially since the arrival of exchange-traded funds (ETFs), which greatly simplify the process.  It’s no longer a matter of trying to ferret out the details of important companies and untangling the differentials in local currencies.

The simplest of all ways to invest abroad is to buy broad-based, exchange-traded funds that track the performance of specific countries or regions.  The broadest coverage of all would be IXUS, the iShares Core MSCI Total International Stock ETF.  Similar funds are available from Vanguard, Fidelity, and others.

A narrower focus is available through EFA, iShares MSCI EAFE ETF.  EAFE stands for Europe, Australasia, and Far East.  Then there’s EEM, which is an ETF for emerging markets, IEV for Europe, EWJ for Japan, and FXI for China.  There are numerous others, but the essential ingredient in all cases is a substantial level of trading to ensure that there’s a ready market for buyers and sellers.

Over time, these ETFs have typically had valuations 20% or more below those of the U.S.  There have been extended periods when they substantially outperformed domestic stocks and others when they lagged far behind.  In the half decade prior to 2022, when the U.S. market soared, foreign markets were far behind.

So far this year, however, the picture has brightened for investing abroad, but the undervaluation persists.  Even so, an interesting differential has developed.  With one exception, the international ETFs noted above turned in similar returns.  The exception was the pattern of FXI, the ETF for China, which perhaps due to the country’s strict lockdown approach to the pandemic experienced a far steeper market downturn until early spring this year.

Then things changed, China’s economy started to perk up and so did FXI.  Unlike the other international ETFs and the Standard & Poor’s 500 Index, all of which are still far down in the teens for the year to date, FXI has climbed from a shortfall of more than 20% in early May to a deficit of only 5% in current trading.

Given what may be viewed as the more limited transparency of international companies and contrasts with non-U.S. accounting methods, the leaner valuations abroad are understandable.  Still, there are more than a few parts of the world where the future growth rates will exceed those of mature economies.  More rapid growth often goes hand in hand with stronger market returns. 

N. Russell Wayne, CFP®

Sound Asset Management Inc.

Weston, CT  06883

 203-222-9370

 www.soundasset.com

www.soundasset.blogspot.com

Any questions?  Please contact me at nrwayne@soundasset.com

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Sound Advice: July 16, 2025

Fixed annuities are poor investments Fixed annuities are often criticized as poor investments for several reasons, despite their reputation for providing stable, predictable income.  Here are the key drawbacks and concerns:   High Fees and Commissions Internal Fees:  Fixed annuities can carry a range of fees, including administrative charges, mortality expense risk fees, and rider fees. These can add up to 2%–4% per year, significantly eroding returns over time. Commissions:  Sales agents and financial advisors often receive high commissions for selling annuities—sometimes as much as 5%–8% of the invested amount. This creates a financial incentive for advisers to recommend them, even when they may not be the best fit for the client. Comparison to Other Investments:  Mutual funds and ETFs typically have much lower fees and commissions, making them more cost-effective for long-term growth. Limited Growth a...
Post a Comment
Read more

Sound Advice: October 8, 2025

How many investors have outperformed the stock market over the last 20 years? Very few investors have outperformed the stock market over the past 20 years.   Data shows that only about 6% to 8% of actively managed equity funds in the U.S. beat the market over this period, with the vast majority—over 90%—underperforming the S&P 500 or equivalent broad indexes. Percentage of Investors Beating the Market Only 8% of equity funds investing in large companies managed to outperform the market over a recent 20-year span. About 94% of all domestic funds underperformed the S&P 1500 Composite Index from 2005-2024. Over shorter timeframes (5-10 years), typically fewer than 15-20% of fund managers beat the S&P 500, and performance persistence is rare. Why It Is Rare The S&P 500’s high returns have proven immensely difficult to beat, especially as indexing has become popular and markets have ...
Post a Comment
Read more

Sound Advice: November 10, 2025

The stock market indexes seem to be dominated by a handful of tech stocks, but how is the average stock doing? As of late October/early November 2025, the S&P 500 index excluding the Magnificent Seven stocks (the "Other 493") has delivered a modest year-to-date return of approximately 5.3% to 5.4%. That’s barely more than one third of the performance of the full, market-capitalization-weighted S&P 500 index, which was up around 15.1% to 16% over the same period.  (The Magnificent Seven stocks are Alphabet (Google), Amazon, Apple, Meta (Facebook), Microsoft, Nvidia, and Tesla.) Index Concentration and Market Breadth The S&P 500 Equal Weight Index underperformed the standard, cap-weighted S&P 500 by about 12% in 2024, reflecting the gap between the top performing giants and the rest of the market. Only sectors like utilities, industrials, real estate, and energy outperformed their cap-weighted peers, while tech and consumer-focused sectors were ...
Post a Comment
Read more