Skip to main content

Sound Advice: July 20, 2022

Tops and Bottoms 

With all due respect to those who in hushed tones profess to know the precise levels of high and low points of the investment markets, no one has such a vision of the future.  At best, this information is available in retrospect, not in advance.

Over the latest decade and a half, there have been four market tops and three market bottoms.  The fourth bottom may have already occurred or it still may lie ahead.  The first of these peaks was on March 24, 2000, just before the market was en route to a 49% plunge, which continued until October 9, 2002.  Those were the days of the dot.com companies with great stories, but no profits.

The second peak was on October 9, 2007, the precursor to a 57% drop in the averages, which ended on March 9, 2009.  That 17-month pullback reflected the chaos in the financial markets that nearly brought the system to a halt.

From that time until February 19, 2020, the Standard & Poor’s Index rose 401% before hitting the wall of the coronavirus pandemic.  In the five weeks that followed, the S&P nosedived 34%, then more than doubled by the beginning of the current year.

The lesson to be learned here is that of relative valuations.  In the latest quarter-century, the average valuation of the S&P Index has been 16.9x earnings.  What does that mean?  This index consists of large and small companies.  The earnings of the index reflect the trends in the profitability of those companies.  What’s important is the rate of change over time.  As growth accelerates, valuations increase.  And vice versa.

During recessions, growth disappears temporarily and valuations shrink.  When growth resumes, valuations widen.

So it should come as no surprise that during the low growth decade from 2000-2010, the index valuation shrank from more than 24 times to less than 10 times in the midst of the banking crisis.  By last year, thanks to a subsequent acceleration of corporate growth, it had worked its way back over 22 times, once again in rich territory.

Although high valuations alone do not lead to market weakness, unfavorable economic and geopolitical events often light the spark that sends the indexes lower.  That has been the case this year.

On June 30th, the valuation of the S&P had dropped to 15.9x earnings, which is not far from the low points of recent market bottoms.  Whether there’s more slippage ahead remains to be seen, but it seems likely that we are in the neighborhood of where the next advance will begin.

N. Russell Wayne, CFP®

Sound Asset Management Inc.

Weston, CT  06883

203-222-9370

www.soundasset.com

www.soundasset.blogspot.com

 

Any questions?  Please contact me at nrwayne@soundasset.com

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Sound Advice: September 19, 2026

Is AI good news or bad news for investments? AI is potentially very good news for investors—but not automatically good news for every investment . The key distinction is between AI as an economic technology and AI stocks at today's prices . As of September 2026, there are compelling reasons for both optimism and caution: The bullish case: AI spending remains enormous. Gartner estimates global AI spending at $2.7 trillion in 2026 , up 49.5% year over year. If AI produces sustained productivity gains, corporate profits could expand well beyond the companies currently selling AI hardware. The valuation case: Investors have already priced in a lot of success. Valuations of major AI companies are elevated and expected long-term earnings growth is well above historical norms. The spending-risk case: The five largest hyperscalers are expected to spend more than $1 trillion on AI-related capital expendit...

Sound Advice: September 30, 2026

Now what? For many women, there comes a time when financial confusion reigns.   It may come after a spouse passes or a marriage goes off the rails.   It’s the same situation for women who never married. The questions are many.   The answers may be few.   Toward the top of the list of concerns is the issue of understanding.   Although there are always complex matters, it’s essential that all of the elements are clearly presented in a straightforward fashion.   There’s more.   Presentation is one thing, but comprehension is another. If there’s a question, it must be asked.   Clarity is the key.   Don’t just say I get it when you don’t.   And, it’s essential to grasp how each of the items fits in the overall situation. In the absence of understanding, no decisions will be made. Here are some of the most pressing questions? What’s the smart way to handle my investments? Where should I go for advice? A bank, stockbroker, attor...

Sound Advice: October 14, 2026

Why your adviser must be a fiduciary   You should insist that your financial adviser be a fiduciary because a fiduciary is legally obligated, when acting in a fiduciary capacity, to put your interests ahead of their own and manage conflicts of interest appropriately. Key reasons: Your interests come first. A fiduciary duty requires the adviser to act in your best interest rather than simply recommending something that is suitable or profitable for them. Fewer conflicts of interest. Some advisers can receive commissions, bonuses, or other compensation for recommending particular investments or insurance products. A fiduciary must address material conflicts rather than allowing them to drive the recommendation. Greater transparency. Fiduciary advisers generally have obligations concerning disclosure, fees, conflicts, and how they are compensated. That makes it easier for you to understand what you're actually paying. Better alignment over the long term. A good adviser sh...