Skip to main content

Sound Advice: June 15, 2022

All High Dividend Strategies Are Not The Same 

Comprehensive studies have highlighted the advantages provided by holding stocks with high dividend yields over extended periods, often at least a few years.  High dividend yields go hand in hand with low valuations, so this approach would seem to make a lot of sense.  But there’s a lot more to the strategy than just buying the highest yielders and then waiting for the payoff.

A closer look is essential.  One example is companies that don’t have sufficient profits to support their dividends.  Sometimes that suggests the possibility of a dividend cut or elimination, which means the high dividend yield is about to be reduced or disappear.  On a few occasions, when the earnings shortfall is not likely to persist, the dividend may be maintained.

Another concern is stocks that always have high yields and low valuations simply because the growth rates of the companies are modest or erratic.  Whether it’s slow growth, erratic progress or uncertainty about where companies are headed, investors won’t pay up.

The element that gives the high dividend yield stocks the edge is the occasional surprise that company profits have been significantly better than expected.  When that happens, their prices often jump.  The flip side, for stocks with low dividend yields and high valuations, is the likelihood that investors will bail out when there are disappointments.

However one approaches the high dividend yield strategy, it’s important to remember that the longstanding advantages it provides depend on buying a widely spread group of these stocks.  This can be done through a variety of strategies available through exchange-traded funds.  The best-known of these funds are:

SPDR S&P Dividend ETF (SDY)

iShares Select Dividend ETF (DVY)

Amplify CWP Enhanced Dividend Income ETF (DIVO)

WisdomTree U.S. Quality Dividend Growth ETF (DGRW)

Vanguard Dividend Appreciation Index Fund ETF (VIG)

SDY invests in companies that have consistently increased dividends every year for at least 20 consecutive years.  DVY is less specific, focusing on the highest-yielding stocks in the S&P Index.

DGRW differs slightly in that it includes high dividend paying U.S. common stocks with growth characteristics.

DIVO is quite different.  It invests in dividend-paying U.S. stocks along with an options strategy to reduce volatility and boost returns.

Then there’s VIG, which is a hybrid version of the high dividend yield strategy.  VIG includes a broad group of stocks in the Standard & Poor’s 500 Index that have a history of increasing dividends over time, the length of which is not specified.  This ETF turns out to have a far larger number of dividend yielding stocks so it ends up somewhere between a high dividend yield ETF and a typical S&P 500 index fund.

What’s important to remember is that although the high dividend approach has had good results over long periods, its returns are anything but assured in every single year.  Indeed, there have been multiyear spans when it came up far short.

N. Russell Wayne, CFP®

Sound Asset Management Inc.

Weston, CT  06883

203-222-9370

www.soundasset.com

www.soundasset.blogspot.com

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Sound Advice: July 16, 2025

Fixed annuities are poor investments Fixed annuities are often criticized as poor investments for several reasons, despite their reputation for providing stable, predictable income.  Here are the key drawbacks and concerns:   High Fees and Commissions Internal Fees:  Fixed annuities can carry a range of fees, including administrative charges, mortality expense risk fees, and rider fees. These can add up to 2%–4% per year, significantly eroding returns over time. Commissions:  Sales agents and financial advisors often receive high commissions for selling annuities—sometimes as much as 5%–8% of the invested amount. This creates a financial incentive for advisers to recommend them, even when they may not be the best fit for the client. Comparison to Other Investments:  Mutual funds and ETFs typically have much lower fees and commissions, making them more cost-effective for long-term growth. Limited Growth a...
Post a Comment
Read more

Sound Advice: October 8, 2025

How many investors have outperformed the stock market over the last 20 years? Very few investors have outperformed the stock market over the past 20 years.   Data shows that only about 6% to 8% of actively managed equity funds in the U.S. beat the market over this period, with the vast majority—over 90%—underperforming the S&P 500 or equivalent broad indexes. Percentage of Investors Beating the Market Only 8% of equity funds investing in large companies managed to outperform the market over a recent 20-year span. About 94% of all domestic funds underperformed the S&P 1500 Composite Index from 2005-2024. Over shorter timeframes (5-10 years), typically fewer than 15-20% of fund managers beat the S&P 500, and performance persistence is rare. Why It Is Rare The S&P 500’s high returns have proven immensely difficult to beat, especially as indexing has become popular and markets have ...
Post a Comment
Read more

Sound Advice: January 15, 2025

Why investors shouldn't pay attention to Wall Street forecasts   Investors shouldn't pay attention to Wall Street forecasts for several compelling reasons: Poor accuracy Wall Street forecasts have a terrible track record of accuracy. Studies show that their predictions are often no better than random chance, with accuracy rates as low as 47%   Some prominent analysts even perform worse, with accuracy ratings as low as 35% Consistent overestimation Analysts consistently overestimate earnings growth, predicting 10-12%                 annual growth when the reality is closer to 6%.   This overoptimism can                 lead investors to make overly aggressive bets in the market. Inability to predict unpredictable events The stock market is influenced by numerous unpredictable factors, including geopolitical events, technological changes, and company-specific news.   Anal...
Post a Comment
Read more