Skip to main content

Sound Advice: April 13, 2022

Tough Time For Bonds

Over the years, difficult periods for the stock market have invariably prompted “flights to quality” on the part of investors.  In most cases, these shifts meant that funds were being moved from higher risk holdings to those appearing to offer increased safety.  That usually led to a redeployment from stocks to bonds, typically those of the U.S. Treasury or high-grade corporate borrowings. 

With interest rates now rising, however, that approach is no longer working.  Indeed, in recent months it has backfired.  In the latest calendar quarter, the Treasury market posted its worst performance in more than 40 years.  For the period, the ICE 15+Year U.S. Treasury Index sustained a loss of 13%.  The iShares 20+ Year Treasury Bond Index dropped 14%.

This is typical of what takes place when interest rates are rising.  The rule of thumb for bonds is that when rates rise, bond prices fall.  In most cases, the longer the maturity of the bonds, the greater the interim loss.

Why does this happen?  Interest rates on bonds are set near prevailing rates when they are first issued.  If, for example, a new bond carries an interest rate of 4% and a year later interest rates for a bond of similar maturity have climbed to 5%, the market price of the 4% bond will drop to a level at which a buyer will receive a 5% return.  In this case, let’s assume that the original value of the bond was $1,000.  To provide a 5% return, the value of that bond would have to drop to $800.

That’s what happens when rates are rising. During these times, bonds can be problematic investments.  Of course, as bonds get close to their maturity dates their prices will move up to the face value, but there could be a very long wait and an extended span when market prices are well under purchase prices.

The sensitivity to interest rate changes is reduced as the time to maturity is shortened, but short maturities have very low returns.  Current rates for U.S. Treasury securities range from only 0.7% for three-month bills to 2.8% for 10-year bonds.  Higher rates are available from lower-quality issues, but the exposure to price erosion increases as the quality drops.

By comparison, the dividend yield from the Standard & Poor’s 500 Stock Index is 1.4%, not much different from that of shorter-term treasuries, but in view of the likelihood of a rebound following this year’s pullback in the stock market, flights to quality in response to current market stress would be ill-advised. 

N. Russell Wayne, CFP®

Sound Asset Management Inc.

Weston, CT  06883

203-222-9370

www.soundasset.com

www.soundasset.blogspot.com

Any questions?  Please contact me at nrwayne@soundasset.com

                                                                                                                   

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Sound Advice: March 16, 2022

Pullback . . . and then what?   The one certainty about the stock market is well illustrated by an account of a 1955 story about J. Pierpont Morgan given by the U.S. Secretary of the Treasury George M. Humphrey. The story is as follows: Somebody said: ‘Mr. Morgan, you are familiar with the stock market.?’ He said: ‘Yes.’ They said: ‘You know quite a lot about it?’   And he said: ‘Yes, I do.’ They said: ‘Do you think you can tell us what the stock market will do?’   He said: ‘Yes, I can.’   They said: ‘That is very interesting.   Will you please do so?’   He said: ‘Yes. It will fluctuate.’ Equally on point is a quotation from Benjamin Graham, widely known as the father of value investing and co-author with David Dodd of the recognized text on Security Analysis: “Most of the time common stocks are subject to irrational and excessive price fluctuations in both directions as the consequence of the ingrained tendency of most people to speculate or gamble . . . to give way to hop

Sound Advice: January 5, 2022

Where do we go from here?   When you consider the wide variety of factors that impact the economy and the investment markets, it would be unrealistic to be encouraged by prospects for the next few years.  Yet, although opportunities for continued progress may be more limited, there are always some worth considering. Let’s put this in perspective.  Following the 23 trading days of The Pandemic Plunge, which saw prices collapse by 34%, the Standard & Poor’s 500 Index then rebounded 113% by the most recent December 31st.  On that date, the forward price-earnings ratio of stocks in the index had risen to a lofty 21.2 compared with a 25-year average of 16.8.  (That ratio is calculated by dividing the latest level of the index (4,766) by the estimated earnings of the included companies for the next 12 months .)  By all measures, that’s a hefty valuation, one that’s even more so since it depends on estimates of what’s to come, which are anything but assured. Other measures confirm

Sound Advice: May 26, 2021

Growth vs. Value? One of the longest-running dichotomies in investing is the ongoing tug of war between growth stocks and value stocks.   Growth stocks are generally seen as companies that are growing consistently and, typically, at above average rates.   Value stocks, on the other hand, are companies whose progress is less consistent and often relatively slow.   At first glance, one wonders why investors would look beyond growth stocks to fill out their portfolios, but there’s more to the task of portfolio construction than just picking market stars such as Amazon, Apple, Facebook, and the like. Here’s the hitch.   Over time, most growth stocks will turn in better returns than most value stocks.   The key word here is most.   A portfolio of diversified growth stocks will usually be selling at significantly higher valuations (price-earnings ratios) than a portfolio of diversified value stocks.   Why?   Because more rapid and more consistent growth rates give investors greater con