Skip to main content

Sound Advice: March 30, 2022

Annuities? 

Few would argue that the promise of guaranteed income for life has an encouraging ring to it.  Indeed, there is a product offered by insurance companies that does offer such a prospect. 

The deal is straightforward.  You give the insurance company your money and the company agrees to pay you a stated rate of return for a specified period of time, often as long as you live.  That’s the typical model of a fixed annuity. 

From a business perspective, the insurance company is betting that the return on the investment it is making with the funds you are transferring to them will exceed the regular payments it is making to you.  If the specified term is however long you will live, the company ends up ahead if you die early.  If you outlive the expected term, you are the winner.

With a fixed annuity, the money is gone once it’s transferred.  What’s more, the rate of return specified in the agreement is usually fixed.  This may or may not be reset over time.  In view of the historically low interest rates that have prevailed for the past decade or so as well as the likelihood that rates are now moving higher, it would seem ill-advised to lock in at the current modest rates.

And then there are variable annuities, which share a name, but are markedly different from fixed annuities.  Variables are the insurance companies’ answer to mutual funds.

One main difference is that the funds transferred to the insurance company for investment through the variable can be withdrawn.  There is, of course, a caveat.  That’s known as the surrender period, which is usually about seven years.  If you withdraw before the expiration of the surrender period, there will be a charge.  For example, if you withdraw after one year, the surrender charge would be about 6%.  Surrender charges decline annually.

With rare exception, the annual fees for variable annuities are high, which is especially problematical at times such as now when interest rates are so low.  What’s more, the number of investment alternatives available (a.k.a. subaccounts) tends to be limited, which is a significant negative.

Even so, there’s at least one important advantage available from variables.  When the contribution limits for other tax-deferred options such as IRAs and 401K plans have been reached, a variable annuity is available for those seeking another option for tax-deferred investment.  It’s important to note, too, that withdrawals from variable annuities are taxed as ordinary income, not at capital gains rates.

There may also be a death benefit, but that may be no more than the balance of whatever was transferred to the insurance company.  Or it may step up over time if the value of the account increases.

Another feature could be a guaranteed minimum income benefit, when withdrawals take place.  That could be even if there is not enough money in your account to support that level of payments.

A further possibility is long-term care insurance, which pays for home health care or nursing home care if you become seriously ill.

Bottom line: All annuities are not created equal.  Look carefully before you leap.

N. Russell Wayne, CFP®

Any questions?  Please contact me at nrwayne@soundasset.com


Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Sound Advice: July 16, 2025

Fixed annuities are poor investments Fixed annuities are often criticized as poor investments for several reasons, despite their reputation for providing stable, predictable income.  Here are the key drawbacks and concerns:   High Fees and Commissions Internal Fees:  Fixed annuities can carry a range of fees, including administrative charges, mortality expense risk fees, and rider fees. These can add up to 2%–4% per year, significantly eroding returns over time. Commissions:  Sales agents and financial advisors often receive high commissions for selling annuities—sometimes as much as 5%–8% of the invested amount. This creates a financial incentive for advisers to recommend them, even when they may not be the best fit for the client. Comparison to Other Investments:  Mutual funds and ETFs typically have much lower fees and commissions, making them more cost-effective for long-term growth. Limited Growth a...

Sound Advice: October 8, 2025

How many investors have outperformed the stock market over the last 20 years? Very few investors have outperformed the stock market over the past 20 years.   Data shows that only about 6% to 8% of actively managed equity funds in the U.S. beat the market over this period, with the vast majority—over 90%—underperforming the S&P 500 or equivalent broad indexes. Percentage of Investors Beating the Market Only 8% of equity funds investing in large companies managed to outperform the market over a recent 20-year span. About 94% of all domestic funds underperformed the S&P 1500 Composite Index from 2005-2024. Over shorter timeframes (5-10 years), typically fewer than 15-20% of fund managers beat the S&P 500, and performance persistence is rare. Why It Is Rare The S&P 500’s high returns have proven immensely difficult to beat, especially as indexing has become popular and markets have ...

Sound Advice: January 15, 2025

Why investors shouldn't pay attention to Wall Street forecasts   Investors shouldn't pay attention to Wall Street forecasts for several compelling reasons: Poor accuracy Wall Street forecasts have a terrible track record of accuracy. Studies show that their predictions are often no better than random chance, with accuracy rates as low as 47%   Some prominent analysts even perform worse, with accuracy ratings as low as 35% Consistent overestimation Analysts consistently overestimate earnings growth, predicting 10-12%                 annual growth when the reality is closer to 6%.   This overoptimism can                 lead investors to make overly aggressive bets in the market. Inability to predict unpredictable events The stock market is influenced by numerous unpredictable factors, including geopolitical events, technological changes, and company-specific news.   Anal...