Skip to main content

Sound Advice: February 9, 2022

Economics: The Great Guessing Game 

Among the most interesting (and controversial) developments affecting the investment markets are the periodic reports on what’s taking place in the economy.  The ongoing flow of information includes the weekly level of new unemployment claims, the monthly reports on the consumer price index, and the monthly reports on new jobs.  Although many esteemed economists provide regular weighty pronouncements on what the new numbers will be, the accuracy of same is on a par with a blindfolded person throwing at a dartboard.

Indeed, prior to the announcement of the job numbers for January, economists put forth estimates that averaged 150,000 new jobs, suggesting that the situation was significantly constrained by the dramatic jump in Omicron variant Covid cases.  Several even forecast a substantial drop in the jobs total.

The actual result was quite different: 467,000 new jobs.

It gets much worse because the numbers reported each month are always revised, usually by a lot.  In December, the initial report was an addition of 199,000 new jobs.  That was later revised to 510,000 new jobs.  The November report estimated 249,000 new jobs, but that was revised to 647,000 new jobs.

Not only is the probability of a gross error of concern, but equally important are the assumptions created as a result.  Given the ongoing strength in demand for goods and services, one of the biggest challenges facing businesses is finding enough labor to provide the required supply.  This have resulted in higher salaries, sign-up bonuses, and the ongoing need to maintain adequate staffing.  The latter is still constrained by health-related absences.

This relative imbalance has led to a continuation of an inflation rate that’s several times the level seen as optimal by the Federal Reserve.  Although the Fed’s actions are supposed to take into account a wide variety of business measures, the report on new jobs, even though often wide of the mark, cannot be ignored.  That makes the Central Bank’s task even more challenging.

As a result, it seems appropriate to avoid knee-jerk reactions to the ongoing flow of business information.  Patience and perspective against a long-term context will prove to be more worthwhile.

N. Russell Wayne, CFP®

Sound Asset Management Inc.

Weston, CT  06883

203-222-9370

www.soundasset.com

www.soundasset.blogspot.com

Any questions?  Please contact me at nrwayne@soundasset.com

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Sound Advice: September 30, 2026

Now what? For many women, there comes a time when financial confusion reigns.   It may come after a spouse passes or a marriage goes off the rails.   It’s the same situation for women who never married. The questions are many.   The answers may be few.   Toward the top of the list of concerns is the issue of understanding.   Although there are always complex matters, it’s essential that all of the elements are clearly presented in a straightforward fashion.   There’s more.   Presentation is one thing, but comprehension is another. If there’s a question, it must be asked.   Clarity is the key.   Don’t just say I get it when you don’t.   And, it’s essential to grasp how each of the items fits in the overall situation. In the absence of understanding, no decisions will be made. Here are some of the most pressing questions? What’s the smart way to handle my investments? Where should I go for advice? A bank, stockbroker, attor...
Post a Comment
Read more

Sound Advice: September 19, 2026

Is AI good news or bad news for investments? AI is potentially very good news for investors—but not automatically good news for every investment . The key distinction is between AI as an economic technology and AI stocks at today's prices . As of September 2026, there are compelling reasons for both optimism and caution: The bullish case: AI spending remains enormous. Gartner estimates global AI spending at $2.7 trillion in 2026 , up 49.5% year over year. If AI produces sustained productivity gains, corporate profits could expand well beyond the companies currently selling AI hardware. The valuation case: Investors have already priced in a lot of success. Valuations of major AI companies are elevated and expected long-term earnings growth is well above historical norms. The spending-risk case: The five largest hyperscalers are expected to spend more than $1 trillion on AI-related capital expendit...
Post a Comment
Read more

Sound Advice: October 14, 2026

Why your adviser must be a fiduciary   You should insist that your financial adviser be a fiduciary because a fiduciary is legally obligated, when acting in a fiduciary capacity, to put your interests ahead of their own and manage conflicts of interest appropriately. Key reasons: Your interests come first. A fiduciary duty requires the adviser to act in your best interest rather than simply recommending something that is suitable or profitable for them. Fewer conflicts of interest. Some advisers can receive commissions, bonuses, or other compensation for recommending particular investments or insurance products. A fiduciary must address material conflicts rather than allowing them to drive the recommendation. Greater transparency. Fiduciary advisers generally have obligations concerning disclosure, fees, conflicts, and how they are compensated. That makes it easier for you to understand what you're actually paying. Better alignment over the long term. A good adviser sh...
Post a Comment
Read more