Skip to main content

Sound Advice: January 19, 2022

The January Effect

What Wall Streeters refer to as the January effect focuses on both likely market performance during the year’s starting weeks and how that may set the direction for the remainder of the year.  Several studies that have examined historical numbers suggest that January does indeed lead the way to what’s ahead.  That suggestion, however, is less than compelling.

No doubt, there is a strong upward seasonal bias during the colder months.  A review of market returns over the last five decades clearly shows that the first and fourth calendar quarters of the year, on average, account for two-thirds of the recorded annual gains.  It does not, however, clearly demonstrate that any one month stands out.

Those who follow the January Effect theory argue that the yearly opener favors small company stocks.  Although there is some evidence that may have been the case quite a while back, that’s no longer true.

Others pay less attention to the differential between company sizes and offer the thought that investors tend to sell off underperforming holdings in January to lock in tax losses, but that seems silly since they would have missed the opportunity to do so in December and get the benefit sooner.  Selling in December might put pressure on stock prices, though reinvestment of those funds in January might well renew upward momentum.

Whatever the long view may be, investors always tend to focus on current developments.  As questionable as it may be, you can be certain that the media will provide reasons for market movements every single day, even if the averages rise sharply one day and drop by a similar amount a day later.  Neither of these pronouncements is of any merit, but those who follow the media demand answers, even though the words they hear are what the British call rubbish.

In the short term, the most powerful force behind market movements is investor psychology.  The critical issues investors are responding to currently are prospective increases in interest rates, dysfunction in government, COVID, supply chain disruptions, threats to the Ukraine, and inflation, just to name a few.

Sometimes markets move ahead while investors ignore the negatives.  That was the case for a good part of last year.  With the onset of 2022, however, the pendulum has swung in the opposite direction.  It will for a while and then resume its long-time advance.  

N. Russell Wayne, CFP®

Any questions?  Please contact me at nrwayne@soundasset.com

 


Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Sound Advice: January 3, 2025

2025 Market Forecasts: Stupidity Taken To An Extreme   If you know anything about stock market performance, you can only gag at the nonsense “esteemed forecasters” are now putting forth about the prospective path of stocks in the year ahead.   Our cousins in the UK would call this rubbish.   I would not be as kind. Leading the Ship of Fools is the forecast from the Chief Investment Strategist at Oppenheimer who is looking for a year-end 2025 level for the Standard & Poor’s Index of 7,100, a whopping 21% increase from the most recent standing.   Indeed, most of these folks are looking for double-digit gains.   Only two expect stocks to weaken. In the last 30 years, the market has risen by more than 20% only 15 times.   The exceptional span during that time was 1996-1999, which accounted for four of those jumps.   What followed in 2000 through 2002 was the polar opposite: 2000:      -9.1% 2001:     -11.9% ...
Post a Comment
Read more

Sound Advice: January 15, 2025

Why investors shouldn't pay attention to Wall Street forecasts   Investors shouldn't pay attention to Wall Street forecasts for several compelling reasons: Poor accuracy Wall Street forecasts have a terrible track record of accuracy. Studies show that their predictions are often no better than random chance, with accuracy rates as low as 47%   Some prominent analysts even perform worse, with accuracy ratings as low as 35% Consistent overestimation Analysts consistently overestimate earnings growth, predicting 10-12%                 annual growth when the reality is closer to 6%.   This overoptimism can                 lead investors to make overly aggressive bets in the market. Inability to predict unpredictable events The stock market is influenced by numerous unpredictable factors, including geopolitical events, technological changes, and company-specific news.   Anal...
Post a Comment
Read more

Sound Advice: July 16, 2025

Fixed annuities are poor investments Fixed annuities are often criticized as poor investments for several reasons, despite their reputation for providing stable, predictable income.  Here are the key drawbacks and concerns:   High Fees and Commissions Internal Fees:  Fixed annuities can carry a range of fees, including administrative charges, mortality expense risk fees, and rider fees. These can add up to 2%–4% per year, significantly eroding returns over time. Commissions:  Sales agents and financial advisors often receive high commissions for selling annuities—sometimes as much as 5%–8% of the invested amount. This creates a financial incentive for advisers to recommend them, even when they may not be the best fit for the client. Comparison to Other Investments:  Mutual funds and ETFs typically have much lower fees and commissions, making them more cost-effective for long-term growth. Limited Growth a...
Post a Comment
Read more