Skip to main content

How’s The Market?  Which One?

The first question is fairly common.  The second question is quite rare.  Why?  Because there are numerous stock market indexes and from the narrowest to the broadest there is a huge difference in the stocks included and their returns.

The best-known index is the Dow Jones Industrial Average, which is composed of 30 of the largest U.S. companies.   The Dow, like most other indexes, is a biased reflection of market performance.  The obvious reason is that it is a small sample, albeit that of the largest companies.  Less obvious, but more important, is that the index movements are primarily driven by the higher priced stocks in the group.

Professional investors pay more attention to the Standard & Poor’s 500 Index, the movements of which often vary substantially from those of the Dow.  The S&P is weighted by the market value of the companies’ shares, which means that the biggest companies in the group have the greatest impact.  In recent years, major technology companies such as Meta (née Facebook), Apple, Amazon, Netflix, and Alphabet (née Google) have been the main engines for gains.

A more accurate portrayal of how the S&P has been doing is seen by viewing the Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight exchange-traded fund, which equally weights all the companies included, so the changes in the prices of the smallest companies have the same impact as those of the giants.

The ProShares S&P 500 Ex-Technology exchange-traded fund takes this one step further by measuring the S&P 500 without the 70 technology companies that are in the index.  That slices off about 30-35% of the aggregate value of the companies covered, but it also shows that the typical returns from most stocks are far lower.

Rather than narrowing, Vanguard’s Total Market Index exchange-traded fund includes a total of 4,124 different stocks.  Even broader is the Wilshire 5000 Index Fund, which (no surprise) includes 5,000 stocks.

From top to bottom, the returns over the latest five years have differed greatly.  The top returns were from the S&P 500 and the Total Market Index, both of which had a massive tech bias.  The lowest returns were from the Dow and the S&P 500 ETF ex-the tech stocks.  The gains for the latter pair were about one-third lower than for the top two.

So when someone asks you about the market, you need to ask which one.

N. Russell Wayne, CFP®

Sound Asset Management Inc.

Weston, CT  06883

203-222-9370

www.soundasset.com

www.soundasset.blogspot.com

Any questions?  Please contact me at nrwayne@soundasset.com

 

 

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Sound Advice: July 16, 2025

Fixed annuities are poor investments Fixed annuities are often criticized as poor investments for several reasons, despite their reputation for providing stable, predictable income.  Here are the key drawbacks and concerns:   High Fees and Commissions Internal Fees:  Fixed annuities can carry a range of fees, including administrative charges, mortality expense risk fees, and rider fees. These can add up to 2%–4% per year, significantly eroding returns over time. Commissions:  Sales agents and financial advisors often receive high commissions for selling annuities—sometimes as much as 5%–8% of the invested amount. This creates a financial incentive for advisers to recommend them, even when they may not be the best fit for the client. Comparison to Other Investments:  Mutual funds and ETFs typically have much lower fees and commissions, making them more cost-effective for long-term growth. Limited Growth a...
Post a Comment
Read more

Sound Advice: October 8, 2025

How many investors have outperformed the stock market over the last 20 years? Very few investors have outperformed the stock market over the past 20 years.   Data shows that only about 6% to 8% of actively managed equity funds in the U.S. beat the market over this period, with the vast majority—over 90%—underperforming the S&P 500 or equivalent broad indexes. Percentage of Investors Beating the Market Only 8% of equity funds investing in large companies managed to outperform the market over a recent 20-year span. About 94% of all domestic funds underperformed the S&P 1500 Composite Index from 2005-2024. Over shorter timeframes (5-10 years), typically fewer than 15-20% of fund managers beat the S&P 500, and performance persistence is rare. Why It Is Rare The S&P 500’s high returns have proven immensely difficult to beat, especially as indexing has become popular and markets have ...
Post a Comment
Read more

Sound Advice: January 15, 2025

Why investors shouldn't pay attention to Wall Street forecasts   Investors shouldn't pay attention to Wall Street forecasts for several compelling reasons: Poor accuracy Wall Street forecasts have a terrible track record of accuracy. Studies show that their predictions are often no better than random chance, with accuracy rates as low as 47%   Some prominent analysts even perform worse, with accuracy ratings as low as 35% Consistent overestimation Analysts consistently overestimate earnings growth, predicting 10-12%                 annual growth when the reality is closer to 6%.   This overoptimism can                 lead investors to make overly aggressive bets in the market. Inability to predict unpredictable events The stock market is influenced by numerous unpredictable factors, including geopolitical events, technological changes, and company-specific news.   Anal...
Post a Comment
Read more