Skip to main content

Sound Advice: November 17, 2021

FAANGs? 

No, that’s not a typo.  It’s about the ongoing disparity between overall market returns and the price action of a few large tech companies for nearly a decade.  Until recently, FAANG stood for Facebook, Amazon, Apple, Netflix, and Google. Although Google renamed itself Alphabet and Facebook morphed into Metaverse, current conversations continue to speak of them as before.

A distant cousin of the FAANGs emerged almost a half century ago.  That cousin was known as the Nifty Fifty, which included such names as General Electric, Coca-Cola, and IBM.  The Nifty Fifty group also included Xerox, Polaroid, and Eastman Kodak.  What the FAANGs have in common with their ancestors is extraordinarily high price-earnings ratios (i.e., valuations). 

These were referred to as one-decision stocks. Wharton professor Jeremy Siegel suggested that investors could buy them and hold forever, but that suggestion didn’t turn out well.  The extreme bear market of the early 1970s crushed valuations across the board.  At the market bottom, the price-earnings ratio of the Standard & Poor’s 500 Index fell into the high single digits, compared to more than twice that today.

Some of the companies survived, but for most the picture, if there is one, was not pretty.  Polaroid and Eastman Kodak are ghosts.  Xerox is no longer the dominant name in copiers. GE is in the process of splitting into three parts. IBM and Coca Cola, however, remain healthy, but significantly changed from their prior selves.

Which brings us back to the FAANGs’ continuing distortion of current market valuations, which are near the top end of their historic range.  Excluding the FAANGs, market valuations would be about 10% lower. That may be viewed as reasonable as long as interest rates remain in the low range that has prevailed for more than 10 years.

Going forward, however, there are risks.  One is the pace of future growth.  For all of these companies, prospects are viewed as unusually bright.  Here and there, a brief misstep may not be an issue, but any that don’t maintain their recent growth pace will see their valuations markedly squeezed.  What’s more, a significant uptick in prevailing interest rates will put pressure on overall stock valuations.

The former is always a distinct possibility.  The latter is a probability. 

N. Russell Wayne, CFP®

Sound Asset Management Inc.

Weston, CT  06883

203-222-9370

www.soundasset.com

www.soundasset.blogspot.com

 

Any questions?  Please contact me at nrwayne@soundasset.com

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Sound Advice: September 30, 2026

Now what? For many women, there comes a time when financial confusion reigns.   It may come after a spouse passes or a marriage goes off the rails.   It’s the same situation for women who never married. The questions are many.   The answers may be few.   Toward the top of the list of concerns is the issue of understanding.   Although there are always complex matters, it’s essential that all of the elements are clearly presented in a straightforward fashion.   There’s more.   Presentation is one thing, but comprehension is another. If there’s a question, it must be asked.   Clarity is the key.   Don’t just say I get it when you don’t.   And, it’s essential to grasp how each of the items fits in the overall situation. In the absence of understanding, no decisions will be made. Here are some of the most pressing questions? What’s the smart way to handle my investments? Where should I go for advice? A bank, stockbroker, attor...

Sound Advice: September 19, 2026

Is AI good news or bad news for investments? AI is potentially very good news for investors—but not automatically good news for every investment . The key distinction is between AI as an economic technology and AI stocks at today's prices . As of September 2026, there are compelling reasons for both optimism and caution: The bullish case: AI spending remains enormous. Gartner estimates global AI spending at $2.7 trillion in 2026 , up 49.5% year over year. If AI produces sustained productivity gains, corporate profits could expand well beyond the companies currently selling AI hardware. The valuation case: Investors have already priced in a lot of success. Valuations of major AI companies are elevated and expected long-term earnings growth is well above historical norms. The spending-risk case: The five largest hyperscalers are expected to spend more than $1 trillion on AI-related capital expendit...

Sound Advice: October 14, 2026

Why your adviser must be a fiduciary   You should insist that your financial adviser be a fiduciary because a fiduciary is legally obligated, when acting in a fiduciary capacity, to put your interests ahead of their own and manage conflicts of interest appropriately. Key reasons: Your interests come first. A fiduciary duty requires the adviser to act in your best interest rather than simply recommending something that is suitable or profitable for them. Fewer conflicts of interest. Some advisers can receive commissions, bonuses, or other compensation for recommending particular investments or insurance products. A fiduciary must address material conflicts rather than allowing them to drive the recommendation. Greater transparency. Fiduciary advisers generally have obligations concerning disclosure, fees, conflicts, and how they are compensated. That makes it easier for you to understand what you're actually paying. Better alignment over the long term. A good adviser sh...