Skip to main content

Sound Advice: November 17, 2021

FAANGs? 

No, that’s not a typo.  It’s about the ongoing disparity between overall market returns and the price action of a few large tech companies for nearly a decade.  Until recently, FAANG stood for Facebook, Amazon, Apple, Netflix, and Google. Although Google renamed itself Alphabet and Facebook morphed into Metaverse, current conversations continue to speak of them as before.

A distant cousin of the FAANGs emerged almost a half century ago.  That cousin was known as the Nifty Fifty, which included such names as General Electric, Coca-Cola, and IBM.  The Nifty Fifty group also included Xerox, Polaroid, and Eastman Kodak.  What the FAANGs have in common with their ancestors is extraordinarily high price-earnings ratios (i.e., valuations). 

These were referred to as one-decision stocks. Wharton professor Jeremy Siegel suggested that investors could buy them and hold forever, but that suggestion didn’t turn out well.  The extreme bear market of the early 1970s crushed valuations across the board.  At the market bottom, the price-earnings ratio of the Standard & Poor’s 500 Index fell into the high single digits, compared to more than twice that today.

Some of the companies survived, but for most the picture, if there is one, was not pretty.  Polaroid and Eastman Kodak are ghosts.  Xerox is no longer the dominant name in copiers. GE is in the process of splitting into three parts. IBM and Coca Cola, however, remain healthy, but significantly changed from their prior selves.

Which brings us back to the FAANGs’ continuing distortion of current market valuations, which are near the top end of their historic range.  Excluding the FAANGs, market valuations would be about 10% lower. That may be viewed as reasonable as long as interest rates remain in the low range that has prevailed for more than 10 years.

Going forward, however, there are risks.  One is the pace of future growth.  For all of these companies, prospects are viewed as unusually bright.  Here and there, a brief misstep may not be an issue, but any that don’t maintain their recent growth pace will see their valuations markedly squeezed.  What’s more, a significant uptick in prevailing interest rates will put pressure on overall stock valuations.

The former is always a distinct possibility.  The latter is a probability. 

N. Russell Wayne, CFP®

Sound Asset Management Inc.

Weston, CT  06883

203-222-9370

www.soundasset.com

www.soundasset.blogspot.com

 

Any questions?  Please contact me at nrwayne@soundasset.com

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Sound Advice: July 16, 2025

Fixed annuities are poor investments Fixed annuities are often criticized as poor investments for several reasons, despite their reputation for providing stable, predictable income.  Here are the key drawbacks and concerns:   High Fees and Commissions Internal Fees:  Fixed annuities can carry a range of fees, including administrative charges, mortality expense risk fees, and rider fees. These can add up to 2%–4% per year, significantly eroding returns over time. Commissions:  Sales agents and financial advisors often receive high commissions for selling annuities—sometimes as much as 5%–8% of the invested amount. This creates a financial incentive for advisers to recommend them, even when they may not be the best fit for the client. Comparison to Other Investments:  Mutual funds and ETFs typically have much lower fees and commissions, making them more cost-effective for long-term growth. Limited Growth a...
Post a Comment
Read more

Sound Advice: October 8, 2025

How many investors have outperformed the stock market over the last 20 years? Very few investors have outperformed the stock market over the past 20 years.   Data shows that only about 6% to 8% of actively managed equity funds in the U.S. beat the market over this period, with the vast majority—over 90%—underperforming the S&P 500 or equivalent broad indexes. Percentage of Investors Beating the Market Only 8% of equity funds investing in large companies managed to outperform the market over a recent 20-year span. About 94% of all domestic funds underperformed the S&P 1500 Composite Index from 2005-2024. Over shorter timeframes (5-10 years), typically fewer than 15-20% of fund managers beat the S&P 500, and performance persistence is rare. Why It Is Rare The S&P 500’s high returns have proven immensely difficult to beat, especially as indexing has become popular and markets have ...
Post a Comment
Read more

Sound Advice: January 15, 2025

Why investors shouldn't pay attention to Wall Street forecasts   Investors shouldn't pay attention to Wall Street forecasts for several compelling reasons: Poor accuracy Wall Street forecasts have a terrible track record of accuracy. Studies show that their predictions are often no better than random chance, with accuracy rates as low as 47%   Some prominent analysts even perform worse, with accuracy ratings as low as 35% Consistent overestimation Analysts consistently overestimate earnings growth, predicting 10-12%                 annual growth when the reality is closer to 6%.   This overoptimism can                 lead investors to make overly aggressive bets in the market. Inability to predict unpredictable events The stock market is influenced by numerous unpredictable factors, including geopolitical events, technological changes, and company-specific news.   Anal...
Post a Comment
Read more