Skip to main content

Sound Advice: September 15, 2021

What’s a Safe Withdrawal Rate in Retirement?

If you are already retired or planning to retire soon, one of your biggest concerns will be having sufficient income from your investments (and Social Security) to cover your ongoing expenses without running out of money.  Another concern will be how you will spend your time, preferably in a satisfying manner. 

The financial part of the equation can be tricky since there are several variables that can change the outcome dramatically.  Those with children often are concerned about leaving a substantial inheritance.  Those without heirs can draw down the earnings on their assets and take distributions from the principal amount.

The former situation has a heightened emphasis on the prospective returns on assets invested and the ongoing flow of expenses.  The usually suggested withdrawal rate is 4% of assets in Year One, adjusted each year thereafter for inflation.  When inflation rises, the withdrawal increases . . . and vice-versa.

Viewed against nearly a century of returns on both stocks and bonds, a 4% target would appear to be easily attainable.  For the past 95 years, the average annual return on stocks has been about 10%.  Returns on bonds have been closer to 5%.  Given this information, one would think that a 4% target would be easy to reach.  It may or may not be.

A closer look at more recent returns on stocks will be helpful.  From 2000 to 2010, following the collapse of the stock market after the dot.com bubble, the market averages fluctuated widely, but ended the period with essentially no net return.  In the decade that followed, however, returns were well above the long-term average.

Bonds followed a dramatically different path.  Over the past four decades, interest rates on bonds went from the mid-teens to a notch above zero.  When interest rates drop, bonds rise.  Not surprisingly, 40 years of dropping interest rates led to unusually high returns on bonds.  Now interest rates are rising and bond prices are falling.

Where are we now?  Stock valuations are currently toward the upper end of their historic range, running above 20 times prospective earnings for 2022.  Although corporate profits have rebounded impressively from their Covid-depressed levels of 2020, much of the government stimulus aimed at economic recovery has passed.  And a hefty portion of the above average savings accumulated during the pandemic has been spent. 

With that said, it would be naïve to look for better than moderate returns from stocks going forward.  Plus, with interest rates on the rise over the next few years, bond prices will remain under pressure.

The response to this prospect points toward a higher percentage in stocks along with the acceptance of inherently greater volatility.  Bond allocations would be reduced; their primary role would be to provide overall stability, rather than enhancement of returns.

N. Russell Wayne, CFP®

Any questions?  Please contact me at nrwayne@soundasset.com


Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Sound Advice: July 16, 2025

Fixed annuities are poor investments Fixed annuities are often criticized as poor investments for several reasons, despite their reputation for providing stable, predictable income.  Here are the key drawbacks and concerns:   High Fees and Commissions Internal Fees:  Fixed annuities can carry a range of fees, including administrative charges, mortality expense risk fees, and rider fees. These can add up to 2%–4% per year, significantly eroding returns over time. Commissions:  Sales agents and financial advisors often receive high commissions for selling annuities—sometimes as much as 5%–8% of the invested amount. This creates a financial incentive for advisers to recommend them, even when they may not be the best fit for the client. Comparison to Other Investments:  Mutual funds and ETFs typically have much lower fees and commissions, making them more cost-effective for long-term growth. Limited Growth a...

Sound Advice: October 8, 2025

How many investors have outperformed the stock market over the last 20 years? Very few investors have outperformed the stock market over the past 20 years.   Data shows that only about 6% to 8% of actively managed equity funds in the U.S. beat the market over this period, with the vast majority—over 90%—underperforming the S&P 500 or equivalent broad indexes. Percentage of Investors Beating the Market Only 8% of equity funds investing in large companies managed to outperform the market over a recent 20-year span. About 94% of all domestic funds underperformed the S&P 1500 Composite Index from 2005-2024. Over shorter timeframes (5-10 years), typically fewer than 15-20% of fund managers beat the S&P 500, and performance persistence is rare. Why It Is Rare The S&P 500’s high returns have proven immensely difficult to beat, especially as indexing has become popular and markets have ...

Sound Advice: January 15, 2025

Why investors shouldn't pay attention to Wall Street forecasts   Investors shouldn't pay attention to Wall Street forecasts for several compelling reasons: Poor accuracy Wall Street forecasts have a terrible track record of accuracy. Studies show that their predictions are often no better than random chance, with accuracy rates as low as 47%   Some prominent analysts even perform worse, with accuracy ratings as low as 35% Consistent overestimation Analysts consistently overestimate earnings growth, predicting 10-12%                 annual growth when the reality is closer to 6%.   This overoptimism can                 lead investors to make overly aggressive bets in the market. Inability to predict unpredictable events The stock market is influenced by numerous unpredictable factors, including geopolitical events, technological changes, and company-specific news.   Anal...