Skip to main content

Sound Advice: September 15, 2021

What’s a Safe Withdrawal Rate in Retirement?

If you are already retired or planning to retire soon, one of your biggest concerns will be having sufficient income from your investments (and Social Security) to cover your ongoing expenses without running out of money.  Another concern will be how you will spend your time, preferably in a satisfying manner. 

The financial part of the equation can be tricky since there are several variables that can change the outcome dramatically.  Those with children often are concerned about leaving a substantial inheritance.  Those without heirs can draw down the earnings on their assets and take distributions from the principal amount.

The former situation has a heightened emphasis on the prospective returns on assets invested and the ongoing flow of expenses.  The usually suggested withdrawal rate is 4% of assets in Year One, adjusted each year thereafter for inflation.  When inflation rises, the withdrawal increases . . . and vice-versa.

Viewed against nearly a century of returns on both stocks and bonds, a 4% target would appear to be easily attainable.  For the past 95 years, the average annual return on stocks has been about 10%.  Returns on bonds have been closer to 5%.  Given this information, one would think that a 4% target would be easy to reach.  It may or may not be.

A closer look at more recent returns on stocks will be helpful.  From 2000 to 2010, following the collapse of the stock market after the dot.com bubble, the market averages fluctuated widely, but ended the period with essentially no net return.  In the decade that followed, however, returns were well above the long-term average.

Bonds followed a dramatically different path.  Over the past four decades, interest rates on bonds went from the mid-teens to a notch above zero.  When interest rates drop, bonds rise.  Not surprisingly, 40 years of dropping interest rates led to unusually high returns on bonds.  Now interest rates are rising and bond prices are falling.

Where are we now?  Stock valuations are currently toward the upper end of their historic range, running above 20 times prospective earnings for 2022.  Although corporate profits have rebounded impressively from their Covid-depressed levels of 2020, much of the government stimulus aimed at economic recovery has passed.  And a hefty portion of the above average savings accumulated during the pandemic has been spent. 

With that said, it would be naïve to look for better than moderate returns from stocks going forward.  Plus, with interest rates on the rise over the next few years, bond prices will remain under pressure.

The response to this prospect points toward a higher percentage in stocks along with the acceptance of inherently greater volatility.  Bond allocations would be reduced; their primary role would be to provide overall stability, rather than enhancement of returns.

N. Russell Wayne, CFP®

Any questions?  Please contact me at nrwayne@soundasset.com


Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Sound Advice: March 10, 2021

The ABCs of Stock Picking After decades of analyzing stocks (and funds) and investing for clients, I'm happy to share in plain English what's involved, what works, and what doesn't.  Keep in mind the reality that successful stock picking is an effort to maintain a good batting average. In baseball, a batting average of .300 or better is considered quite good.  With stock picking, you need to do better than .600, which means you have many more winners than losers. No one gets it right all of the time.  It's not even close.  Wall Street shops all have their recommended lists and the financial media regularly hawk 10 stocks to buy now. Following that road usually is a direct route to disaster.  Don't be tempted. Let's begin with the big picture: The stock market goes up and down over time, but the long-term trend is up.  When there's a rally under way, everyone feels like a genius.  When the market hits an air pocket, though, with few exception...

Sound Advice: January 3, 2025

2025 Market Forecasts: Stupidity Taken To An Extreme   If you know anything about stock market performance, you can only gag at the nonsense “esteemed forecasters” are now putting forth about the prospective path of stocks in the year ahead.   Our cousins in the UK would call this rubbish.   I would not be as kind. Leading the Ship of Fools is the forecast from the Chief Investment Strategist at Oppenheimer who is looking for a year-end 2025 level for the Standard & Poor’s Index of 7,100, a whopping 21% increase from the most recent standing.   Indeed, most of these folks are looking for double-digit gains.   Only two expect stocks to weaken. In the last 30 years, the market has risen by more than 20% only 15 times.   The exceptional span during that time was 1996-1999, which accounted for four of those jumps.   What followed in 2000 through 2002 was the polar opposite: 2000:      -9.1% 2001:     -11.9% ...

Sound Advice: January 15, 2025

Why investors shouldn't pay attention to Wall Street forecasts   Investors shouldn't pay attention to Wall Street forecasts for several compelling reasons: Poor accuracy Wall Street forecasts have a terrible track record of accuracy. Studies show that their predictions are often no better than random chance, with accuracy rates as low as 47%   Some prominent analysts even perform worse, with accuracy ratings as low as 35% Consistent overestimation Analysts consistently overestimate earnings growth, predicting 10-12%                 annual growth when the reality is closer to 6%.   This overoptimism can                 lead investors to make overly aggressive bets in the market. Inability to predict unpredictable events The stock market is influenced by numerous unpredictable factors, including geopolitical events, technological changes, and company-specific news.   Anal...