Skip to main content

Sound Advice: July 7, 2021

Inflation Worries


Inflation has not been a persistent and serious threat to the economy since the 1970s and early 1980s.  The Fed knows how to defeat inflation.  Raise interest rates to onerous levels and quash demand in the economy via a serious recession.  In turn, companies lose the ability to rapidly boost prices, and employees no longer have the leverage to demand outsized wage hikes.

We don’t want to repeat that cycle.

At a minimum, however, we are starting to see upward pressure on prices.  How long might this last?  The Consumer Price Index jumped 5.0% in May, from the year-earlier level.  Remove food and energy, and so-called core inflation surged 3.8%.

Fed officials continue to insist any increase will be “transitory,” their word of choice in describing what they see as a temporary rise in prices tied to the reopening of the economy.  That may be the case for hotels and airlines ready to see a jump in summer bookings.  But there are issues that are influencing pricing decisions on the production side of the economy, too.

We have learned that huge cash infusions via government stimulus will boost demand.  We are seeing it in record retail sales reported monthly by the U.S. Census Bureau.  Yet, production has been slower to rebound.

A May 13th story in the Wall Street Journal, “Empty Lots, Angry Customers: Semiconductor Crisis (Shortages) Throws Wrench Into Car Business,” sums up what’s happening in the auto industry and highlights the problems auto buyers are facing.  Or here is another look from a May 11th CNBC feature: “U.S. Faces Major Shortages in Everything from Labor to Semiconductors, Lumber, and Packaging Material.”

In April, the National Association of Homebuilders said that lumber shortages are leading to skyrocketing lumber prices, adding an average of $36,000 to the cost of a new home over the last year.

Government spending and a super accommodative Federal Reserve argue for a more permanent and unwanted rise in inflation.  Even so, longer-term disinflationary trends, i.e., demographic trends and globalization, remain in place.  What’s more, labor unions, which helped drive a wage/price spiral in the 1970s, don’t have the power they once had.

Where do we stand?  There are reputable economists on both sides of the inflation debate.  No one wants to see a return to the double-digit inflation problems of the 1970s, and the Fed is more likely to react now than was the case a generation ago.

But we don’t expect the Fed to lift interest rates anytime soon, as central bankers continue to insist their focus is on full employment, and any rise in pricing pressures is temporary.  Nonetheless, the best news on inflation is probably behind us.

N. Russell Wayne, CFP®

Sound Asset Management Inc.

Weston, CT  06883

 

203-222-9370

 

www.soundasset.com

www.soundasset.blogspot.com

 

Any questions? Please contact me at nrwayne@soundasset.com 

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Sound Advice: July 16, 2025

Fixed annuities are poor investments Fixed annuities are often criticized as poor investments for several reasons, despite their reputation for providing stable, predictable income.  Here are the key drawbacks and concerns:   High Fees and Commissions Internal Fees:  Fixed annuities can carry a range of fees, including administrative charges, mortality expense risk fees, and rider fees. These can add up to 2%–4% per year, significantly eroding returns over time. Commissions:  Sales agents and financial advisors often receive high commissions for selling annuities—sometimes as much as 5%–8% of the invested amount. This creates a financial incentive for advisers to recommend them, even when they may not be the best fit for the client. Comparison to Other Investments:  Mutual funds and ETFs typically have much lower fees and commissions, making them more cost-effective for long-term growth. Limited Growth a...
Post a Comment
Read more

Sound Advice: October 8, 2025

How many investors have outperformed the stock market over the last 20 years? Very few investors have outperformed the stock market over the past 20 years.   Data shows that only about 6% to 8% of actively managed equity funds in the U.S. beat the market over this period, with the vast majority—over 90%—underperforming the S&P 500 or equivalent broad indexes. Percentage of Investors Beating the Market Only 8% of equity funds investing in large companies managed to outperform the market over a recent 20-year span. About 94% of all domestic funds underperformed the S&P 1500 Composite Index from 2005-2024. Over shorter timeframes (5-10 years), typically fewer than 15-20% of fund managers beat the S&P 500, and performance persistence is rare. Why It Is Rare The S&P 500’s high returns have proven immensely difficult to beat, especially as indexing has become popular and markets have ...
Post a Comment
Read more

Sound Advice: January 15, 2025

Why investors shouldn't pay attention to Wall Street forecasts   Investors shouldn't pay attention to Wall Street forecasts for several compelling reasons: Poor accuracy Wall Street forecasts have a terrible track record of accuracy. Studies show that their predictions are often no better than random chance, with accuracy rates as low as 47%   Some prominent analysts even perform worse, with accuracy ratings as low as 35% Consistent overestimation Analysts consistently overestimate earnings growth, predicting 10-12%                 annual growth when the reality is closer to 6%.   This overoptimism can                 lead investors to make overly aggressive bets in the market. Inability to predict unpredictable events The stock market is influenced by numerous unpredictable factors, including geopolitical events, technological changes, and company-specific news.   Anal...
Post a Comment
Read more