Skip to main content

Sound Advice: July 28, 2021

 Stock Valuations 101

Although there may be gurus who hearken to the influence of the Zodiac or lunar cycles, the valuations of most stocks are based on what's known as the price-earnings ratio.  In simple terms, that's the price of one share divided by the earnings per share.  The latter is the amount of earnings for the company as whole divided by the number of shares outstanding.

The price-earnings ratio depends on several key factors.  Perhaps of greatest importance is the company's rate of growth. The rule of thumb is that the faster the rate of growth, the higher the price-earnings ratio, but there's a limit to what would be considered reasonable.  A typical range of price-earnings ratios is between 10 and 20 times.

That's true of both individual stocks and the stock market as a whole.  Larger, more mature companies will probably grow more slowly while some small companies might well increase their profits more rapidly.

There are caveats.  In a perfect world, high growth would be accompanied by consistent progress. That in turn would suggest that there is high confidence that the rate of growth could be maintained, which is why there are instances when stocks carrying very high price-earnings ratios are said to be "priced for perfection".  The rub is that the slightest misstep can quickly undermine the valuation, i.e., sharply reduce the price-earnings ratio.

When looking at companies with high price-earnings ratios, it's wise to fully appreciate the risk of something going awry.  It happens more often than not and can be quite costly.  Just because a company has grown quickly in the past is no reason for the current price-earnings ratio to be stretched.  Indeed, the most that should be said for a good historical record is that it may lend a greater measure of confidence (and introduce an element of reduced risk) to where things stand today.  The rate of past growth is largely irrelevant.

It's important to differentiate growth from periodic recovery, such as that typical of cyclical companies.  The latter usually display boom and bust characteristics.  For these companies, a few years of increases are usually followed by a few years of sagging results. As a result, the price-earnings ratio will be high during the years of weak results as investors anticipate the rebound that will probably follow.  And vice-versa.  Interest rates play an important role, too.  When rates are low, price-earnings ratios tend to be high.

Over the past few years, prevailing rates have been at or near historic lows, so typical price-earnings ratios have been above average, largely in reflection of the interest rate environment.  But what we're seeing today is nothing like the bloated valuations of the dot.com era, when multiples soared beyond 30 times.

One useful tool for getting a handle on valuations is the PEG ratio.  That's the current price-earnings ratio divided by the prospective rate of growth.  So, for example, if the p-e is 20 and the projected rate of growth is 10%, the PEG ratio would be 2.0.  That's a bit generous, though not unusual.  Investors would be better advised to seek out issues where the PEG is lower.

A good understanding of stock valuations is essential to uncovering worthy candidates for one's portfolio.  Ignore them at your own risk.

 

N. Russell Wayne, CFP®

Any questions? Please contact me at nrwayne@soundasset.com

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Sound Advice: July 16, 2025

Fixed annuities are poor investments Fixed annuities are often criticized as poor investments for several reasons, despite their reputation for providing stable, predictable income.  Here are the key drawbacks and concerns:   High Fees and Commissions Internal Fees:  Fixed annuities can carry a range of fees, including administrative charges, mortality expense risk fees, and rider fees. These can add up to 2%–4% per year, significantly eroding returns over time. Commissions:  Sales agents and financial advisors often receive high commissions for selling annuities—sometimes as much as 5%–8% of the invested amount. This creates a financial incentive for advisers to recommend them, even when they may not be the best fit for the client. Comparison to Other Investments:  Mutual funds and ETFs typically have much lower fees and commissions, making them more cost-effective for long-term growth. Limited Growth a...
Post a Comment
Read more

Sound Advice: October 8, 2025

How many investors have outperformed the stock market over the last 20 years? Very few investors have outperformed the stock market over the past 20 years.   Data shows that only about 6% to 8% of actively managed equity funds in the U.S. beat the market over this period, with the vast majority—over 90%—underperforming the S&P 500 or equivalent broad indexes. Percentage of Investors Beating the Market Only 8% of equity funds investing in large companies managed to outperform the market over a recent 20-year span. About 94% of all domestic funds underperformed the S&P 1500 Composite Index from 2005-2024. Over shorter timeframes (5-10 years), typically fewer than 15-20% of fund managers beat the S&P 500, and performance persistence is rare. Why It Is Rare The S&P 500’s high returns have proven immensely difficult to beat, especially as indexing has become popular and markets have ...
Post a Comment
Read more

Sound Advice: January 15, 2025

Why investors shouldn't pay attention to Wall Street forecasts   Investors shouldn't pay attention to Wall Street forecasts for several compelling reasons: Poor accuracy Wall Street forecasts have a terrible track record of accuracy. Studies show that their predictions are often no better than random chance, with accuracy rates as low as 47%   Some prominent analysts even perform worse, with accuracy ratings as low as 35% Consistent overestimation Analysts consistently overestimate earnings growth, predicting 10-12%                 annual growth when the reality is closer to 6%.   This overoptimism can                 lead investors to make overly aggressive bets in the market. Inability to predict unpredictable events The stock market is influenced by numerous unpredictable factors, including geopolitical events, technological changes, and company-specific news.   Anal...
Post a Comment
Read more