Skip to main content

Sound Advice: July 28, 2021

 Stock Valuations 101

Although there may be gurus who hearken to the influence of the Zodiac or lunar cycles, the valuations of most stocks are based on what's known as the price-earnings ratio.  In simple terms, that's the price of one share divided by the earnings per share.  The latter is the amount of earnings for the company as whole divided by the number of shares outstanding.

The price-earnings ratio depends on several key factors.  Perhaps of greatest importance is the company's rate of growth. The rule of thumb is that the faster the rate of growth, the higher the price-earnings ratio, but there's a limit to what would be considered reasonable.  A typical range of price-earnings ratios is between 10 and 20 times.

That's true of both individual stocks and the stock market as a whole.  Larger, more mature companies will probably grow more slowly while some small companies might well increase their profits more rapidly.

There are caveats.  In a perfect world, high growth would be accompanied by consistent progress. That in turn would suggest that there is high confidence that the rate of growth could be maintained, which is why there are instances when stocks carrying very high price-earnings ratios are said to be "priced for perfection".  The rub is that the slightest misstep can quickly undermine the valuation, i.e., sharply reduce the price-earnings ratio.

When looking at companies with high price-earnings ratios, it's wise to fully appreciate the risk of something going awry.  It happens more often than not and can be quite costly.  Just because a company has grown quickly in the past is no reason for the current price-earnings ratio to be stretched.  Indeed, the most that should be said for a good historical record is that it may lend a greater measure of confidence (and introduce an element of reduced risk) to where things stand today.  The rate of past growth is largely irrelevant.

It's important to differentiate growth from periodic recovery, such as that typical of cyclical companies.  The latter usually display boom and bust characteristics.  For these companies, a few years of increases are usually followed by a few years of sagging results. As a result, the price-earnings ratio will be high during the years of weak results as investors anticipate the rebound that will probably follow.  And vice-versa.  Interest rates play an important role, too.  When rates are low, price-earnings ratios tend to be high.

Over the past few years, prevailing rates have been at or near historic lows, so typical price-earnings ratios have been above average, largely in reflection of the interest rate environment.  But what we're seeing today is nothing like the bloated valuations of the dot.com era, when multiples soared beyond 30 times.

One useful tool for getting a handle on valuations is the PEG ratio.  That's the current price-earnings ratio divided by the prospective rate of growth.  So, for example, if the p-e is 20 and the projected rate of growth is 10%, the PEG ratio would be 2.0.  That's a bit generous, though not unusual.  Investors would be better advised to seek out issues where the PEG is lower.

A good understanding of stock valuations is essential to uncovering worthy candidates for one's portfolio.  Ignore them at your own risk.

 

N. Russell Wayne, CFP®

Any questions? Please contact me at nrwayne@soundasset.com

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Sound Advice: April 7, 2021

The High Dividend Strategy: Pros and Cons Let's start with the bottom line about investing in high dividend stocks: It works, but there are significant wrinkles.  A while back, I did a 20-year study of investing in high dividend stocks.  The approach was straightforward.  I began with the S&P 500 universe and divided it into 10 groups of 50 stocks each.  The groups were arranged by dividend yield, highest to lowest, at the beginning of each of the years.   I then tracked the total returns (dividends plus capital appreciation) of these groups for the full period. The results were illuminating.   The highest total returns were from the group with the highest dividend yields.   The returns then descended in perfect order down to the group with the lowest dividend yields.   What's more, the aggregate return from the group with the highest returns was greater than that of the Standard & Poor's 500 and its volatility over the period was lower. That did not mean all

Sound Advice: April 14, 2021

Up, Down & Sideways   In past years, the warmer months brought with them a time to turn one’s thoughts to more blissful endeavors.   Although childhood may have been many years ago, what lingers is the apparent freedom from care we felt when at last we were done with school.   Much has changed since those halcyon days when time hardly seemed to move.   Back then, the days went by slowly and the important decisions were few.   Now it’s almost as if you don’t know which direction to turn first. It’s all about communications and the seeming necessity of keeping up to date with what’s going on.   Much of the rising flow of developments may have little impact, but even so it’s no longer a time when we can disconnect until September. From an investment perspective, the challenge is to sort through the rapidly growing mountain of information to isolate the data that is critical and take action where it is needed.   On a grand scale, it’s a matter of separating the wheat from the cha

Sound Advice: April 21, 2021

How is the Market Doing? Despite all the noise being trumpeted by the media, the daily prattle about market moves is often wide of the mark and overloaded with information that is misleading or just plain inaccurate.   How else to explain a jump of several hundred points one day followed by a plunge the next day?   That makes no sense. Over time, the foundation for stock valuations is underlying profitability of the companies involved.   As profits increase, stock prices rise, though not necessarily in perfect reflection.   The relationship tends to be meaningful over extended periods, but often not in shorter spans of time.   That’s all about changes in investor psychology.   So let’s begin by defining the “market”.   If we are referring to stocks, the most common reference is to the Dow Jones Industrial Average, which consists of 30 major companies whose progress might be considered representative of the U.S. economy as a whole. The majority of the companies included here are r