Skip to main content

Sound Advice: July 14, 2021

Dow 100,000

In 1999, James K. Glassman, a syndicated columnist, and Kevin A. Hassett, an economist, published a book entitled Dow 36,000: The New Strategy For Profiting From The Coming Rise in the Stock Market.  The authors’ thesis was that stocks were significantly undervalued.  What’s more, they projected a quadrupling of the Dow Jones Industrial Average within three to five years: 2002 to 2004.

They couldn’t have been more wrong.  The Dow index peaked just above 11,700 in early 2000, then dropped below 7,700 in September 2002, just prior to the time Glassman and Hassett had forecast their 36,000 target.

In 2007, the Dow climbed back to 14,000, then plunged in half by March, 2009. 

What went wrong?

The authors’ argued that investors viewed dividends from stocks as significantly riskier than they should have.  Based upon a reduced risk view of dividends, they suggested that valuations should be based on a multiple about six times the historical rate of 15-18 times earnings.

Their valuation premise was far beyond the limits of reality and their other assumptions, such as those for interest rates, were equally faulty.  More than two decades later, however, we are now in striking distance of 36,000.  That looks like a big number, but even bigger numbers lie ahead.

We can begin by assuming a constant level of valuation, but even if stock values pull back within a normal range, a Dow in the area of 100,000 might well be a possibility 20 years from now.  It would take no more than a 5% gain in the index to reach that level.  Such a projection would require a combination of corporate earnings growth and inflation totaling 5% a year.

That’s probably conservative.  Over time, stocks have generated annual gains on the order of 10%, so even if we have a less ambitious expectation and look for growth of only 7% a year, the 100,000 Dow would be 15 years away.

To be sure, stocks fluctuate in a broad range, but the long view underscores the likelihood that stocks will continue to provide the highest returns of any asset class.

N. Russell Wayne, CFP®

Any questions? Please contact me at nrwayne@soundasset.com


Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Sound Advice: September 30, 2026

Now what? For many women, there comes a time when financial confusion reigns.   It may come after a spouse passes or a marriage goes off the rails.   It’s the same situation for women who never married. The questions are many.   The answers may be few.   Toward the top of the list of concerns is the issue of understanding.   Although there are always complex matters, it’s essential that all of the elements are clearly presented in a straightforward fashion.   There’s more.   Presentation is one thing, but comprehension is another. If there’s a question, it must be asked.   Clarity is the key.   Don’t just say I get it when you don’t.   And, it’s essential to grasp how each of the items fits in the overall situation. In the absence of understanding, no decisions will be made. Here are some of the most pressing questions? What’s the smart way to handle my investments? Where should I go for advice? A bank, stockbroker, attor...
Post a Comment
Read more

Sound Advice: September 19, 2026

Is AI good news or bad news for investments? AI is potentially very good news for investors—but not automatically good news for every investment . The key distinction is between AI as an economic technology and AI stocks at today's prices . As of September 2026, there are compelling reasons for both optimism and caution: The bullish case: AI spending remains enormous. Gartner estimates global AI spending at $2.7 trillion in 2026 , up 49.5% year over year. If AI produces sustained productivity gains, corporate profits could expand well beyond the companies currently selling AI hardware. The valuation case: Investors have already priced in a lot of success. Valuations of major AI companies are elevated and expected long-term earnings growth is well above historical norms. The spending-risk case: The five largest hyperscalers are expected to spend more than $1 trillion on AI-related capital expendit...
Post a Comment
Read more

Sound Advice: October 14, 2026

Why your adviser must be a fiduciary   You should insist that your financial adviser be a fiduciary because a fiduciary is legally obligated, when acting in a fiduciary capacity, to put your interests ahead of their own and manage conflicts of interest appropriately. Key reasons: Your interests come first. A fiduciary duty requires the adviser to act in your best interest rather than simply recommending something that is suitable or profitable for them. Fewer conflicts of interest. Some advisers can receive commissions, bonuses, or other compensation for recommending particular investments or insurance products. A fiduciary must address material conflicts rather than allowing them to drive the recommendation. Greater transparency. Fiduciary advisers generally have obligations concerning disclosure, fees, conflicts, and how they are compensated. That makes it easier for you to understand what you're actually paying. Better alignment over the long term. A good adviser sh...
Post a Comment
Read more