Skip to main content

Sound Advice: July 14, 2021

Dow 100,000

In 1999, James K. Glassman, a syndicated columnist, and Kevin A. Hassett, an economist, published a book entitled Dow 36,000: The New Strategy For Profiting From The Coming Rise in the Stock Market.  The authors’ thesis was that stocks were significantly undervalued.  What’s more, they projected a quadrupling of the Dow Jones Industrial Average within three to five years: 2002 to 2004.

They couldn’t have been more wrong.  The Dow index peaked just above 11,700 in early 2000, then dropped below 7,700 in September 2002, just prior to the time Glassman and Hassett had forecast their 36,000 target.

In 2007, the Dow climbed back to 14,000, then plunged in half by March, 2009. 

What went wrong?

The authors’ argued that investors viewed dividends from stocks as significantly riskier than they should have.  Based upon a reduced risk view of dividends, they suggested that valuations should be based on a multiple about six times the historical rate of 15-18 times earnings.

Their valuation premise was far beyond the limits of reality and their other assumptions, such as those for interest rates, were equally faulty.  More than two decades later, however, we are now in striking distance of 36,000.  That looks like a big number, but even bigger numbers lie ahead.

We can begin by assuming a constant level of valuation, but even if stock values pull back within a normal range, a Dow in the area of 100,000 might well be a possibility 20 years from now.  It would take no more than a 5% gain in the index to reach that level.  Such a projection would require a combination of corporate earnings growth and inflation totaling 5% a year.

That’s probably conservative.  Over time, stocks have generated annual gains on the order of 10%, so even if we have a less ambitious expectation and look for growth of only 7% a year, the 100,000 Dow would be 15 years away.

To be sure, stocks fluctuate in a broad range, but the long view underscores the likelihood that stocks will continue to provide the highest returns of any asset class.

N. Russell Wayne, CFP®

Any questions? Please contact me at nrwayne@soundasset.com


Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Sound Advice: July 16, 2025

Fixed annuities are poor investments Fixed annuities are often criticized as poor investments for several reasons, despite their reputation for providing stable, predictable income.  Here are the key drawbacks and concerns:   High Fees and Commissions Internal Fees:  Fixed annuities can carry a range of fees, including administrative charges, mortality expense risk fees, and rider fees. These can add up to 2%–4% per year, significantly eroding returns over time. Commissions:  Sales agents and financial advisors often receive high commissions for selling annuities—sometimes as much as 5%–8% of the invested amount. This creates a financial incentive for advisers to recommend them, even when they may not be the best fit for the client. Comparison to Other Investments:  Mutual funds and ETFs typically have much lower fees and commissions, making them more cost-effective for long-term growth. Limited Growth a...
Post a Comment
Read more

Sound Advice: October 8, 2025

How many investors have outperformed the stock market over the last 20 years? Very few investors have outperformed the stock market over the past 20 years.   Data shows that only about 6% to 8% of actively managed equity funds in the U.S. beat the market over this period, with the vast majority—over 90%—underperforming the S&P 500 or equivalent broad indexes. Percentage of Investors Beating the Market Only 8% of equity funds investing in large companies managed to outperform the market over a recent 20-year span. About 94% of all domestic funds underperformed the S&P 1500 Composite Index from 2005-2024. Over shorter timeframes (5-10 years), typically fewer than 15-20% of fund managers beat the S&P 500, and performance persistence is rare. Why It Is Rare The S&P 500’s high returns have proven immensely difficult to beat, especially as indexing has become popular and markets have ...
Post a Comment
Read more

Sound Advice: January 15, 2025

Why investors shouldn't pay attention to Wall Street forecasts   Investors shouldn't pay attention to Wall Street forecasts for several compelling reasons: Poor accuracy Wall Street forecasts have a terrible track record of accuracy. Studies show that their predictions are often no better than random chance, with accuracy rates as low as 47%   Some prominent analysts even perform worse, with accuracy ratings as low as 35% Consistent overestimation Analysts consistently overestimate earnings growth, predicting 10-12%                 annual growth when the reality is closer to 6%.   This overoptimism can                 lead investors to make overly aggressive bets in the market. Inability to predict unpredictable events The stock market is influenced by numerous unpredictable factors, including geopolitical events, technological changes, and company-specific news.   Anal...
Post a Comment
Read more