Skip to main content

Sound Advice: June 30, 2021

The All-Weather Portfolio 

The continuum of possibilities within the world of investments has two axes: reward and risk. In virtually all cases, as the potential for reward increases, so does the exposure to risk. For the great majority of portfolios, the key constituents are stocks and bonds. Each of the major asset classes is subdivided into many smaller segments.

Stocks can be divided into domestic and international. Within each of those categories, they can be further divided by the size of the companies they represent. Of those that are international, the countries may be labeled developed or emerging. To make things more confusing, there are companies such as Coca-Cola or 3M that are ostensibly domestic, but in fact derive most of their revenues from outside the U.S.  The converse would be Royal Dutch Petroleum and Nestle, based abroad, but with a considerable presence in North America.

One of the most basic rules of thumb is that over extended periods of time, generally 20 years or more, stocks have always outperformed bonds.  Indeed, over the last nine decades, their average yearly return has been about 10%.

By comparison, bond returns have been closer to 5%.  So if stocks return twice as much as bonds, why not invest only in stocks?  The answer is that although the average return was 10%, there have been years when stocks have lost 20% to 30% or more.  For that matter, there have been decades, such as 2000-2010, when the overall return from stocks marked time.

Bonds are more stable, but they too have roller-coaster periods, such as 1974, when a sharp rise in interest rates wreaked havoc with bond prices, leading to interim principal losses of 20% or more on those with long maturities.  With bonds, however, the losses disappear if the bonds are held to maturity.

One of the ifs in this equation is that the losses will not disappear if the bonds need to be sold prior to maturity.  The other relates to the strength of the companies issuing the bonds.  An issuer having difficulty meeting its obligations may be unable to redeem its bonds at maturity, i.e., default.  Or it may not be able to meet periodic interest payments. Just because a security is called a bond does not mean it is without risk.

Within the spectrum of stocks, there are large capitalizations (shares times market price), companies such as Amazon, Microsoft, and Apple, and small caps, companies whose names few people will recognize.  Over time, small caps have outperformed large caps, but, not surprisingly, they have been considerably more volatile.  What’s more, during periods of unusual market weakness, they tend to be compressed to levels that bear little, if any, relation to their underlying earning power or value of their assets.  But in the rebounds that follow, they often outperform their larger brethren by a wide margin.

Moving out of the mainstream, one finds such things as real estate investment trusts, energy trusts, managed futures, currency hedge funds, arbitrage funds, covered call funds, as well as a variety of even more esoteric opportunities that have their own pluses and minuses.

As the search for an even broader range of investment possibilities continues, it becomes clear that no one asset class (or subclass) offers an optimal balance of reward and risk.  In this quest, the goal is to capture above average returns while exposing one’s assets to a proportionately lower level of risk.  With individual asset classes, it is accurate to believe that higher returns will be accompanied by higher risk.  As more asset classes are added to the mix, however, one can retain much of the potential for gain while markedly reducing the exposure to loss.

The risk variation across the spectrum of asset classes is considerable.  Emerging markets stocks have generated the highest long-term, average annual returns, but their interim fluctuations have been about seven times as high as those of investment grade bonds.  At the same time, there have been several other asset classes that have done almost as well, but with considerably greater stability.  Value stocks, for example, captured about two-thirds of the returns generated by emerging markets stocks, but their volatility has been less than half.

These findings lead to the suggestion that participation in all the key asset classes will provide a better balance overall.  Why?  Because with few exceptions, asset class returns over time have tended to move independently of one another.  It is true that in recent years there has been an increased correlation among those returns, but a distinct difference still remains.

The bottom line is that a well-conceived combination of asset classes will strengthen the portfolio both in terms of potential reward and risk abatement.  Thus, we end up with a fabric that is considerably stronger than any of the threads woven into it.

N. Russell Wayne, CFP®

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Sound Advice: January 3, 2025

2025 Market Forecasts: Stupidity Taken To An Extreme   If you know anything about stock market performance, you can only gag at the nonsense “esteemed forecasters” are now putting forth about the prospective path of stocks in the year ahead.   Our cousins in the UK would call this rubbish.   I would not be as kind. Leading the Ship of Fools is the forecast from the Chief Investment Strategist at Oppenheimer who is looking for a year-end 2025 level for the Standard & Poor’s Index of 7,100, a whopping 21% increase from the most recent standing.   Indeed, most of these folks are looking for double-digit gains.   Only two expect stocks to weaken. In the last 30 years, the market has risen by more than 20% only 15 times.   The exceptional span during that time was 1996-1999, which accounted for four of those jumps.   What followed in 2000 through 2002 was the polar opposite: 2000:      -9.1% 2001:     -11.9% ...

Sound Advice: March 10, 2021

The ABCs of Stock Picking After decades of analyzing stocks (and funds) and investing for clients, I'm happy to share in plain English what's involved, what works, and what doesn't.  Keep in mind the reality that successful stock picking is an effort to maintain a good batting average. In baseball, a batting average of .300 or better is considered quite good.  With stock picking, you need to do better than .600, which means you have many more winners than losers. No one gets it right all of the time.  It's not even close.  Wall Street shops all have their recommended lists and the financial media regularly hawk 10 stocks to buy now. Following that road usually is a direct route to disaster.  Don't be tempted. Let's begin with the big picture: The stock market goes up and down over time, but the long-term trend is up.  When there's a rally under way, everyone feels like a genius.  When the market hits an air pocket, though, with few exception...

Sound Advice: June 17, 2020

Rock and a Hard Place Regardless of your age, impressions from childhood linger.  As the first days of summer approach, we all remember the feeling that accompanied the end of a school year.  Yet as much as many of us would like to believe we again have the summertime freedom to do as we wish, the reality is quite the opposite. Although months of confinement and limitations on social interaction have increased our personal discomfort and severely impacted the business community, our current situation is not analogous to the end of any school year.  It’s quite the opposite. There is every reason to continue wearing face masks, social distancing, and avoiding close contact with others.  Nothing suggests that we can modify our behavior significantly or resume patterns of daily living we enjoyed only a few months ago. There are no meaningful advances in medical treatments.  At best, there are attempts to combine different approaches...