Skip to main content

Sound Advice: April 28, 2021

Why Technology Should Be In Most Portfolios 

Although it is well known that the odds are against investors trying to do better than the leading market indexes, there remains the temptation to be among the few who have actually succeeded in outperforming.  Since stock prices over time reflect changes in underlying earnings, it should be rather obvious that the task of coming out ahead will depend on picking sectors that traditionally have grown more rapidly than industry generally.

That eliminates areas such as basic materials, construction, industrial goods, and insurance, which all have cyclical tendencies.  It also eliminates consumer staples and utilities, which grow steadily, but slowly.

Not only that, but the performance of utility shares directly reflects the comparison of their dividend yields with that of prevailing interest rates since these stocks are usually viewed as income providers.  When utilities raise their dividends regularly, their shares will hold their own.  But when rates rise and dividends are flat, the prices of utility shares will fall.  Given the likelihood of rising interest rates over the next few years, increased care in selecting these stocks will be required.

What's left are financials, health care, and technology, the latter two of which have traditionally been sector standouts.

To put the picture in perspective, I tallied the returns from these three sectors from the market bottom on March 9, 2009 through April 16, 2021 and compared the results to the Standard &Poor’s 500 Index.  I used the following as proxies for the three sectors: XLF (Financial Select Sector SPDR ETF), PRHSX (T. Rowe Price Health Sciences Fund), and XLK (Technology Select SPDR ETF).  XLF and XLK are passive exchange-traded funds, while the Price mutual fund is actively managed. 

As one would expect, the gains over the 12-year period were unusually broad, averaging more than 400%, but only one fund was a standout and the interim price volatility varied considerably.  Although the returns were strong, there was a hefty measure of risk.

The top performer over the period was XLK, the technology ETF, which gained 808%, almost twice that of the S&P index, which was up 421%. T. Rowe Price's Health Sciences Fund was the second-best performer, rising 539%.  The disappointment in the group was XLF, the Financial Services ETF, which had a strong rebound immediately after the 2008-09 crisis, but it ended up at the bottom of the pack with a gain of 389%.

For the first 10 years measured, the volatility of these funds remained within a relatively normal range.  But since then, price fluctuations increased across the board, especially for XLK.

These numbers represent what took place during a period of exceptional returns since they were measured from the bottom of the market crash of 2008-9.  Still, they demonstrate using a short time slice that both technology and health care should be considered important components of most portfolios.  Even if a period of decades had been used, the result would have been similar.

Although I selected these funds as examples of the kinds of returns that would have been provided by investments in these sectors, there are quite a few others that could have been used.  The underlying holdings might have differed, though the result probably would not have been dramatically different.

N. Russell Wayne, CFP® 

Sound Asset Management Inc.

Weston, CT  06883


Any questions? Please contact me at


Popular posts from this blog

Sound Advice: July 8, 2020

Jobs Are Up, But So Are New Infections Through the spring months, m ost of the economic data was extremely negative, with record declines in employment and consumer spending.  The speed of that decline had no modern precedent. We are now in a recession.   The shortest recession on record occurred in 1980 and lasted just six months.  Second place goes to a seven-month recession in 1918-19, which was tied to the Spanish flu pandemic.  The big question is: When will this recession end? Given surprisingly strong data in May, April may have been the bottom of this economic cycle.  If so, it will have been the shortest recession on record.  With massive support from the Federal Reserve, the federal government, and the reopening of previously closed businesses, employment surged unexpectedly.  At the same time, pent-up demand, stimulus checks, and generous unemployment benefits led to a reacceleration of commercial activity. Still, not all is rosy.   In his recent testimo

Sound Advice: May 13, 2020

Reality Check On the heels of the market plunge of late February and most of March, investors did a sharp about-face in April, bidding up shares at one of the fastest rates in recent history.  Although this recovery probably provided at least temporary comfort from the plunge, it would be unreasonable to view the rebound as a sign that things are all better.  They are not. For one thing, we are now in the midst of earnings reason, when companies report their quarterly results.  Some may have good news for the March quarter, but as we move through the current calendar quarter, only a few will be able to show continuing improvement.  Against the broad backdrop of U.S. business history, the months just ahead will almost certainly prove to be among the worst, from the standpoint of year-to-year comparison. With more than 30 million people filing claims for unemployment insurance, it would be difficult to expect anything other than bad economic news.  Who knows how many of these

Sound Advice: July 22, 2020

Fixed Income: In a Fix Typically, the construction of an investment portfolio has begun with an approximate balance of 60% in equities and 40% in fixed income instruments.   Fixed income generally means bonds, but that includes bond funds and exchange-traded funds holding bonds.   The equity portion is intended to be the driver of capital appreciation over extended periods of time and the fixed income portion is supposed to provide stable, albeit more moderate ongoing rates of return. The theory behind this approach is that as the time periods measured have lengthened, the relative risk of holding equities has diminished while the returns they have generated have been higher than those of other asset classes.   What equities do in the short term, even a year or two, is often anybody’s guess.    To the extent that fundamental analysis can help toward determining future equity values, investors need to look ahead three, four, five years or more before reasonably expecting t